Paradoxical reconciliations · thesis 1>2

Thesis 1>2

Latin

Qui dicunt innascibilitatem esse positiuam proprietatem constituentem patrem in esse hypostatico incommunicabili, ab opinione sancti doctoris, a qua multum secundum uerba uidentur discordare, nihil discordant.

Copy-text: Farmer 1998, line 18577

English

Those who hold that unbegottenness is a positive property constituting the Father in an incommunicable hypostatic existence are, in nothing, at variance with the holy doctor's opinion, from which in their wording they seem to differ greatly.

'innascibilitas' rendered 'unbegottenness', the standard term for the Father's Trinitarian property, rather than a literal 'inability to be born'.

Translation: machine-drafted 2026-09-25 by TRANSLATOR-T05; sense checked against farmer1998:18635; awaiting human check

Attribution: Pico's own opinion (section 1>, paradoxical reconciliations of Aristotle, Plato, and other doctors) · Pico's stance: endorses

Discussed in

• Giulio Busi and Raphael Ebgi, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Mito, magia, Qabbalah (2014)

Mention records in the corpus: 1 (deterministic harvest; see Method).

Farmer's cross-references

• 1>3 De ponenda sexta notione, quae est inspirabilitas, non debent discordare Thomistae et Scotistae, si recte suorum doctorum funda/menta intros
• 1>7 De attrıbutorum distinctione non discordant Thommas et Scotus.
• 4.3 Qui dixerit personas in diuinis absolutis proprietatibus distingui, catholicae ueritati non repugnabit.
• 6.4 Pater et filius non solum duo spirantes, sed etiam duo spiratores dici possunt.