Thesis 1>1
Latin
Nullum est quaesitum naturale aut diuinum in quo Aristoteles et Plato sensu et re non conueniant, quamuis uerbis dissentire uideantur.
The sheet's transcription fuses 'diuinum in' into 'diuinumin'; restored here as two words.
English
No question, whether about nature or about God, exists on which Aristotle and Plato are not at one in meaning and in fact, however much they may appear, in their wording, to be at odds.
'sensu et re' rendered 'in meaning and in fact'; deliberately distinct from Farmer's wording (farmer1998:18550).
Discussed in
- M. V. Dougherty (ed.), Pico della Mirandola: New Essays (2008)
- Sophia Howlett, Re-evaluating Pico: Aristotelianism, Kabbalism, and Platonism in the Philosophy of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (2021)
Farmer's cross-references
- 11>63 Sicut Aristoteles diuiniorem philosophiam, quam philosophi antiqui sub fabulis et apologis uelarunt, ipse sub philosophicae speculationis fa
- 2>40 Nec ab Aristotele nec ab expositoribus adducte rationes de salsedine maris sunt sufficientes, nec potest ulla maxime stante mosaica ueritate
- 2>42 Modus ab Aristotele datus quomodo calefiant inferiora a superioribus nullo modo rectus apparet.
- 3>28 Rectius ad quinque suprascripta reducitur entium diuersitas quam ad decem quae Architas primum, deinde Aristoteles posuit, uel quinque quae
- 3>45 Ordo librorum Methaphysicae post naturales, eo modo quo eos ordinauit Aristoteles, secundum nullum processum, siue compositiuum siue resolut
- 3>48 Praeter tria demonstrationis genera, quia, propter quid, et simpliciter, quae ponunt Aristoteles et commentator, datur quartum genus demonst
- 5>42 Per demonstrationem Platonis in Phedro de immortalite animae, firmius demonstratur aeternitas mundi quam per ullam rationem Aristotelis in .
- 7>5 Sicut dictum Aristotelis de antiquis, dicentis quod ideo errarunt in physica contemplatione, quia mathematice_res physicas tractarunt, uerum