Theological, against the common mode · thesis 4>5

Thesis 4>5

Latin

Attributales perfectiones nec in deo, nec secundum se quiditatiue sumptae, dicunt diuersas rationes in recto, et principaliter diffinibiles uel descriptibiles.

Copy-text: Farmer 1998, line 21554

English

The attributal perfections, whether taken in God or taken quidditatively on their own, do not properly amount to distinct concepts, above all ones open to definition or description.

Parallels the claim about the three transcendentals in 4>7.

Translation: machine-drafted 2026-09-26 by TRANSLATOR-T06b; sense checked against farmer1998:21614; awaiting human check

Attribution: Pico's own opinion (section 4>, theological conclusions differing from the common way of the theologians) · Pico's stance: endorses

Farmer's cross-references

• 1>2 Qui dicunt innascibilitatem esse positiuam proprietatem constituentem patrem in esse hypostatico incommunicabili, ab opinione sancti doctori
• 1>3 De ponenda sexta notione, quae est inspirabilitas, non debent discordare Thomistae et Scotistae, si recte suorum doctorum funda/menta intros
• 1>7 De attrıbutorum distinctione non discordant Thommas et Scotus.
• 3>43 Actus quo foelicitatur natura angelica et rationalis ultima foelicitate, nec est actus intellectus, nec uoluntatis, sed est unio unitatis qu
• 4>7 'Tria transcendentia in quibus consistit imago non dicunt diuersas rationes in recto, et principaliter diffinibiles uel descriptibiles.