Paradoxical reconciliations · thesis 1>5

Thesis 1>5

Latin

De quaestione illa, Vtrum sit unum esse in Christo aut plura esse, dico Scotum et Thomam non discordare.

Copy-text: Farmer 1998, line 18592

Apparatus (Farmer): 1486 esse. Dico

The sheet's underscore in 'Christo_aut' is restored to a space.

English

Regarding whether Christ has a single act of existing or more than one, my judgment is that Scotus and Thomas concur.

Sense checked; no further crux.

Translation: machine-drafted 2026-09-25 by TRANSLATOR-T05, reworded 2026-09-26 by TRANSLATOR-FIX; sense checked against farmer1998:18651; awaiting human check

Attribution: Pico's own opinion (section 1>, paradoxical reconciliations of Aristotle, Plato, and other doctors) · Pico's stance: endorses

Discussed in

• Giulio Busi and Raphael Ebgi, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Mito, magia, Qabbalah (2014)

Mention records in the corpus: 1 (deterministic harvest; see Method).

Farmer's cross-references

• 1>2 Qui dicunt innascibilitatem esse positiuam proprietatem constituentem patrem in esse hypostatico incommunicabili, ab opinione sancti doctori
• 1>3 De ponenda sexta notione, quae est inspirabilitas, non debent discordare Thomistae et Scotistae, si recte suorum doctorum funda/menta intros
• 1>6 De distinctione ex natura rei non debent discordare Thomistae et Scotistae, si suos doctores fundamentaliter intelligant.
• 1>7 De attrıbutorum distinctione non discordant Thommas et Scotus.
• 3.7 Pluralitas formalitatum stat cum idemtitate reali.
• 4.4 In Christo fuerunt duo esse.