Alchemical Hands in the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili

Marginalia, Scholarship & Reception

← All Folios

Signature b1r

Folio 9r, Quire b

Folio b1r
Biblioteca degli Intronati, Siena — O.III.38 HIGH Unverified
Folio b1r
Biblioteca degli Intronati, Siena — O.III.38 HIGH Unverified

Vision Reading (Phase 3 deep analysis)

Primary hand: Multiple (3+) · Hands: 3 · Type: text_page · Sig: b3r

Transcription Attempts

top · Latin · LOW
[...] ultra [...] prompta [...] flores [...] nobis [...] Antici [...] 25 [...] Octonari [...]
'Antici' (ancients), 'Octonari' (octave/eightfold) — as seen on p.18 (photo 31). Reader tracking numerical/metrological concepts
right_margin · Latin · MEDIUM
Soph[...] Templi [...] [...] amphi [...] planete [...] XCvuators [...] Horatores [...] Lucis [...]
'Templi' (temple), 'planete' (planets), 'Horatores' (orators?), 'Lucis' (of light). The planetary reference connects to p.88. 'Lucis' (light) has alchemical significance
bottom · Latin/Greek · LOW
Sc [...] Phylotioti [...]
'Phylotioti' may be a Greek-derived term. Very faded

Scholarly Significance

Page 17 continues the pyramid/monument descriptions. The 'planete' annotation establishes that planetary symbolism was being tracked by readers well before the planetary palace on p.88. The word 'Lucis' (of light) has both astronomical and alchemical meanings (lux = the light of transmutation). This page shows the reader building a systematic interpretive framework across the text.

Cross-references: Photo 27 (p.14, Descriptio Pyramidis), Photo 29 (p.16, pyramid woodcut), Photo 101 (p.88, planetary palace)
Vision reading (Claude Code, Phase 3)

Annotations

CROSS_REFERENCE (2)MARGINAL_NOTE (4)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
162 Detail, (a1r) D: Writing in a careful Italian script, this hand responds to the comments of the first French hand. In one instance, this annotator crosses off A’s comments and offers a more abbreviated summary. D’s primary interest is in architecture. This hand switches to Latin when labelling architectural features. Detail, (b1r) E: The final distinguishable hand, writing in Latin in a notably larger script than the other annotators, applies an alchemical reading to ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 173 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
162 Detail, (a1r) D: Writing in a careful Italian script, this hand responds to the comments of the first French hand. In one instance, this annotator crosses off A’s comments and offers a more abbreviated summary. D’s primary interest is in architecture. This hand switches to Latin when labelling architectural features. Detail, (b1r) E: The final distinguishable hand, writing in Latin in a notably larger script than the other annotators, applies an alchemical reading to ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 173 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
al structure to his work. The primary interest of the hands in this copy also lies in the identification of Vitruvian sources. It is in their approach to the use of Vitruvius that these annotators differ from those in other copies. Benedetto and Paolo Giovio read widely through the HP, and marked references to the De architectura as they perceived them to occur. The annotators of Buffalo took an entirely novel approach by comparison. They made use of the woodcut of the Great Pyramid ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 180 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
al structure to his work. The primary interest of the hands in this copy also lies in the identification of Vitruvian sources. It is in their approach to the use of Vitruvius that these annotators differ from those in other copies. Benedetto and Paolo Giovio read widely through the HP, and marked references to the De architectura as they perceived them to occur. The annotators of Buffalo took an entirely novel approach by comparison. They made use of the woodcut of the Great Pyramid ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 180 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
170 Detail (b1r)
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 181 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
170 Detail (b1r)
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 181 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
180 Detail, (b1r) The multiple hands and variety of interests in this copy serve to confirm that the interests and practices seen in other copies were not confined to those individual annotators. The BL annotator was not alone in to inferring an alchemical subtext, nor were the Giovio brothers the only respondents to the HP to take up the challenge of identifying sources in Pliny. Even if prolific annotation was not the norm, recurring streams of thought are evident in annotators ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 191 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
180 Detail, (b1r) The multiple hands and variety of interests in this copy serve to confirm that the interests and practices seen in other copies were not confined to those individual annotators. The BL annotator was not alone in to inferring an alchemical subtext, nor were the Giovio brothers the only respondents to the HP to take up the challenge of identifying sources in Pliny. Even if prolific annotation was not the norm, recurring streams of thought are evident in annotators ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 191 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
162 Detail, (a1r) D: Writing in a careful Italian script, this hand responds to the comments of the first French hand. In one instance, this annotator crosses off A’s comments and offers a more abbreviated summary. D’s primary interest is in architecture. This hand switches to Latin when labelling architectural features. Detail, (b1r) E: The final distinguishable hand, writing in Latin in a notably larger script than the other annotators, applies an alchemical reading to ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 173 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
162 Detail, (a1r) D: Writing in a careful Italian script, this hand responds to the comments of the first French hand. In one instance, this annotator crosses off A’s comments and offers a more abbreviated summary. D’s primary interest is in architecture. This hand switches to Latin when labelling architectural features. Detail, (b1r) E: The final distinguishable hand, writing in Latin in a notably larger script than the other annotators, applies an alchemical reading to ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 173 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
al structure to his work. The primary interest of the hands in this copy also lies in the identification of Vitruvian sources. It is in their approach to the use of Vitruvius that these annotators differ from those in other copies. Benedetto and Paolo Giovio read widely through the HP, and marked references to the De architectura as they perceived them to occur. The annotators of Buffalo took an entirely novel approach by comparison. They made use of the woodcut of the Great Pyramid ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 180 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
al structure to his work. The primary interest of the hands in this copy also lies in the identification of Vitruvian sources. It is in their approach to the use of Vitruvius that these annotators differ from those in other copies. Benedetto and Paolo Giovio read widely through the HP, and marked references to the De architectura as they perceived them to occur. The annotators of Buffalo took an entirely novel approach by comparison. They made use of the woodcut of the Great Pyramid ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 180 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
170 Detail (b1r)
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 181 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Marginal Note
170 Detail (b1r)
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 181 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
180 Detail, (b1r) The multiple hands and variety of interests in this copy serve to confirm that the interests and practices seen in other copies were not confined to those individual annotators. The BL annotator was not alone in to inferring an alchemical subtext, nor were the Giovio brothers the only respondents to the HP to take up the challenge of identifying sources in Pliny. Even if prolific annotation was not the norm, recurring streams of thought are evident in annotators ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 191 (Ch. 7)
Hand D: Anonymous
Cross Reference
180 Detail, (b1r) The multiple hands and variety of interests in this copy serve to confirm that the interests and practices seen in other copies were not confined to those individual annotators. The BL annotator was not alone in to inferring an alchemical subtext, nor were the Giovio brothers the only respondents to the HP to take up the challenge of identifying sources in Pliny. Even if prolific annotation was not the norm, recurring streams of thought are evident in annotators ...
Russell, PhD Thesis, p. 191 (Ch. 7)