Philosophical, against the common view · thesis 2>75

Thesis 2>75

Latin

Diffinitio naturae coelestia comprehendit, et ly et copulatiue tenetur et non disiunctiue.

Copy-text: Farmer 1998, line 20104

Apparatus (Farmer): 1486 & ly : & copulatiue tenetur | 1487 et li. et copulative tenetur

1486/1487 apparatus: 1486 & ly : & copulatiue tenetur | 1487 et li. et copulative tenetur

English

The definition of nature comprehends celestial things as well, and the 'and' there is taken conjunctively, not disjunctively.

'ly'/'li' (the sheet's apparatus preserves both readings) is the scholastic marker for a term taken materially, naming the word itself; left implicit in the translation.

Translation: machine-drafted 2026-09-25 by TRANSLATOR-T05; sense checked against farmer1998:20166; awaiting human check

Attribution: Pico's own opinion (section 2>, philosophical conclusions dissenting from the common philosophy) · Pico's stance: endorses

Farmer's cross-references

• 1.1 Species intelligibiles non sunt necessariae, et eas ponere non est bonis peripateticis consentaneum.
• 2>76 Sicut quilibet philosophus habet dicere quod uirtutes sensitiue / sunt in corde, ita quilibet medicus habet dicere quod sint in cerebro.
• 4>8 Christus non ueraciter et quantum ad realem presentiam descendit ad inferos ut ponit Thommas et communis uia, sed solum quo ad effectum.