In hoc articulo preciso a suis appendiciis: Vtrum angelus potuerit diuinam aequalitatem simpliciter appetere, non discordat Thomas et Scotus.
Copy-text: Farmer 1998, line 18689
English
On this article, taken apart from its appendages — Whether an angel could desire divine equality in an unqualified sense — Thomas and Scotus are not at odds.
The sheet gives no Farmer-English locator for this thesis; the rendering at farmer1998:18745 (within the note apparatus, where Farmer's translation in fact appears) was consulted for sense.
Translation: machine-drafted 2026-09-25 by TRANSLATOR-T05; sense checked against farmer1998:18745; awaiting human check
Attribution: Pico's own opinion (section 1>, paradoxical reconciliations of Aristotle, Plato, and other doctors) · Pico's stance: endorses
Farmer's cross-references
1>10De re nominaliter concepta, primus conceptus qui habetur_est conceptus rei conceptae proprius et conuertibilis.
1>9In materia quid prius cognoscatur magis an minus uniuersale concordant Thommas et Scotus, qui maxime in ea discordare existimantur; de qua p