make a table summary
Please remember to search the user's documents if an answer to their question is not contained in the above snippets.
Here is a detailed summary table for the document provided, "Turning Traditions Upside Down: Rethinking Giordano Bruno’s Enlightenment":
| Section | Contents | Contributions | Challenges | Argument | Quotation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preface | Discusses the multifaceted character of Giordano Bruno, emphasizing his revolutionary ideas in philosophy, cosmology, and natural philosophy. Highlights his contributions to the debate on the freedom of thought. | Introduces Bruno as a transformative figure challenging traditional thought and integrating metaphysical, cosmological, and epistemological ideas into a cohesive framework. | Acknowledges how traditional depictions of Bruno often reduce him to clichés, underestimating his complex intellectual legacy. | Bruno’s works represent a radical intellectual endeavor to redefine cosmological and philosophical paradigms through his idea of an infinite universe and the deconstruction of traditional epistemology. | "The tragedy of Bruno’s life and thought may be seen as a radical symbol of the human struggle for knowledge." | Includes foundational references to Copernican cosmology, Platonic traditions, and Renaissance natural philosophy. |
| Introduction | Explores Bruno’s intellectual evolution, his rejection of Aristotelian scholasticism, and his vision of an infinite, centerless universe. It connects his philosophical principles with his personal trials and eventual martyrdom. | Highlights his systematic integration of traditions (Platonic, Epicurean, and Hermetic) into his novel epistemology and cosmology. | Recognizes the tension between Bruno's philosophical innovations and the institutional opposition they encountered. | Bruno advocates for a metaphysical unity that reconciles opposites, promoting an ethical approach rooted in his cosmology of infinity and interconnectedness. | "Bruno argued relentlessly for a replacement of the philosophical koiné of his time." | Foundational figures include Plato, Epicurus, Copernicus, and Renaissance thinkers like Nicholas of Cusa and Ficino. |
| Part 1: Epistemic Practices | Examines Bruno's methodological innovations, including his reinterpretation of epistemological principles, the role of mnemonics in metaphysics, and the idea of intellectual adaptability. | Demonstrates Bruno’s method of blending metaphysical reflection with practical cognitive strategies, such as "thinking through images" and "default positions" in epistemology. | Challenges static interpretations of philosophical systems, proposing instead a dynamic and recursive model of cognition and metaphysical inquiry. | Bruno's epistemology emphasizes the adaptability of thought processes, viewing knowledge as inherently iterative and relational. | "Bruno advocates a change in the standard principles of thought." | Includes specific analyses of "De triplici minimo et mensura" and "De immenso et innumerabilibus." |
| Part 2: Natural Philosophy | Focuses on Bruno’s cosmology, emphasizing his infinite universe containing innumerable planetary systems. Discusses his rejection of the Ptolemaic-Aristotelian cosmos and the implications of his theories for physics and metaphysics. | Establishes Bruno’s anticipation of modern scientific ideas, including relativity of motion and an infinite, homogeneous space governed by universal laws. | Addresses Bruno's marginalization in scientific discourse despite his pioneering ideas, such as a proto-relativity of time and space. | Bruno rejects anthropocentrism, proposing a cosmological order without a fixed center or privileged perspective. | "The infinite universe contains innumerable inhabited worlds... governed by the same principles." | Draws from Epicurean physics, Copernican heliocentrism, and Newtonian precursors. |
| Part 3: Literary Forms | Explores Bruno’s innovative use of dialogue, satire, and paradox in his writings, emphasizing their role in disrupting conventional literary and philosophical norms. | Highlights Bruno’s blending of literary genres to critique epistemological dogmatism and convey complex metaphysical ideas. | Argues that Bruno’s use of paradox and satire made his works less accessible and prone to misinterpretation by contemporaries and modern readers. | Bruno’s literary innovations reflect his commitment to challenging the reader's expectations and inviting active intellectual engagement. | "The form of Bruno’s texts determines their meaning." | Includes references to "Candelaio" and "Cabala del cavallo pegaseo." |
| Part 4: Reception and Afterlife | Examines Bruno’s intellectual legacy, focusing on his influence in Catholic Europe during the Counter-Reformation and his later reception in literature, philosophy, and the arts. | Demonstrates the evolving interpretation of Bruno as a heretic, scientist, and cultural icon. | Reflects on how Bruno’s ideas were selectively appropriated or censored, particularly by Jesuit scholars like Athanasius Kircher. | Bruno's reception history underscores the enduring relevance and contested nature of his thought across different intellectual and cultural contexts. | "Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in public spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself." | Includes sources on Jesuit scholarship, modern scientific reception, and literary reinterpretations of Bruno. |
| Part 5: Monument to Bruno | Discusses the symbolic significance of the Giordano Bruno monument in Berlin and its representation of Bruno’s legacy as a martyr for intellectual freedom and cosmological inquiry. | Frames the monument as a modern homage to Bruno’s struggle against orthodoxy and his vision of intellectual liberation. | Raises questions about the role of public art in shaping collective memory of historical figures like Bruno. | The monument serves as a metaphor for Bruno’s challenge to overturn intellectual and social hierarchies, reflecting his defiance of conformity. | "The statue depicts the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down." | Includes Alexander Polzin's interpretations and historical accounts of Bruno’s influence on public thought. |
This table encapsulates the major themes and arguments of the text while highlighting its scholarly contributions and challenges. Let me know if you’d like any part expanded or refined!
make a table of ideas from searle and cognitive science mentioned in the study
Here’s a table summarizing the ideas from John R. Searle and cognitive science mentioned in the study, as extracted from the document:
| Concept/Idea | Explanation | Connection to Bruno | Cognitive Science Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Default Positions | Default positions are mental frameworks or assumptions that facilitate cognitive processes, akin to preset software configurations. | Bruno critiques static defaults in epistemology, advocating for a "meta-operation" to adapt and challenge mental models as needed. | Searle describes default positions as tools for cognition, which are practical but can restrict thought when unexamined or unaltered. |
| Meta-Operation | A higher-order cognitive process that modifies the default settings to adapt to new or exceptional contexts. | Bruno’s philosophy involves rethinking fundamental assumptions, such as cosmological and epistemological frameworks, to embrace the infinite. | Meta-operations reflect cognitive flexibility, an advanced capability in problem-solving and creative thinking. |
| Interaction of Prejudices | Prejudices (default positions) can be temporary and functional but become problematic when rigidly held, obstructing intellectual progress. | Bruno’s work dismantles entrenched defaults like the geocentric universe, illustrating the necessity of questioning ingrained beliefs. | Cognitive science examines biases and heuristics as efficient but occasionally limiting strategies for navigating complex environments. |
| Cognition as Relational | Knowledge is shaped by the interaction between experience, perception, and underlying assumptions. | Bruno connects the observer’s perspective to cosmological structures, emphasizing that the universe has no fixed center or hierarchy. | Relational models in cognitive science emphasize the interplay between perception, context, and cognition in constructing knowledge. |
| Infinity and Perception | Human perception is limited by its defaults (e.g., Earth as the center), but rethinking these enables recognition of infinite possibilities. | Bruno challenges sensory reliance and static epistemologies to propose a unified, infinite universe beyond anthropocentric limitations. | Cognitive models address the role of sensory limitations and cognitive adaptation in expanding human understanding of complex phenomena. |
| Mind-World Analogy | The analogy of the mind as a mirror to the world reflects how cognition attempts to represent external realities, often imperfectly. | Bruno’s epistemology suggests that the infinite nature of the universe can only be approximated through evolving, iterative thought processes. | Mirrors cognitive theories of representation, where mental models attempt to simulate or map external realities within inherent constraints. |
This table distills how Searle’s concepts and broader cognitive science principles were interpreted and applied in the study, particularly in the context of Giordano Bruno’s epistemological framework. Let me know if you want to expand or refine this further!
add a column for takeaway
Here’s an updated table with a "Takeaway" column summarizing the key insights from each concept:
| Concept/Idea | Explanation | Connection to Bruno | Cognitive Science Context | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Default Positions | Default positions are mental frameworks or assumptions that facilitate cognitive processes, akin to preset software configurations. | Bruno critiques static defaults in epistemology, advocating for a "meta-operation" to adapt and challenge mental models as needed. | Searle describes default positions as tools for cognition, which are practical but can restrict thought when unexamined or unaltered. | Flexibility in thought is crucial; rigid adherence to defaults can hinder intellectual progress. |
| Meta-Operation | A higher-order cognitive process that modifies the default settings to adapt to new or exceptional contexts. | Bruno’s philosophy involves rethinking fundamental assumptions, such as cosmological and epistemological frameworks, to embrace the infinite. | Meta-operations reflect cognitive flexibility, an advanced capability in problem-solving and creative thinking. | Intellectual adaptability enables significant paradigm shifts, such as Bruno’s embrace of infinity. |
| Interaction of Prejudices | Prejudices (default positions) can be temporary and functional but become problematic when rigidly held, obstructing intellectual progress. | Bruno’s work dismantles entrenched defaults like the geocentric universe, illustrating the necessity of questioning ingrained beliefs. | Cognitive science examines biases and heuristics as efficient but occasionally limiting strategies for navigating complex environments. | Critical thinking requires identifying and revising entrenched assumptions. |
| Cognition as Relational | Knowledge is shaped by the interaction between experience, perception, and underlying assumptions. | Bruno connects the observer’s perspective to cosmological structures, emphasizing that the universe has no fixed center or hierarchy. | Relational models in cognitive science emphasize the interplay between perception, context, and cognition in constructing knowledge. | Recognizing relational dynamics in cognition helps overcome anthropocentric perspectives and fosters holistic understanding. |
| Infinity and Perception | Human perception is limited by its defaults (e.g., Earth as the center), but rethinking these enables recognition of infinite possibilities. | Bruno challenges sensory reliance and static epistemologies to propose a unified, infinite universe beyond anthropocentric limitations. | Cognitive models address the role of sensory limitations and cognitive adaptation in expanding human understanding of complex phenomena. | Expanding perception requires moving beyond immediate sensory inputs to consider abstract or infinite possibilities. |
| Mind-World Analogy | The analogy of the mind as a mirror to the world reflects how cognition attempts to represent external realities, often imperfectly. | Bruno’s epistemology suggests that the infinite nature of the universe can only be approximated through evolving, iterative thought processes. | Mirrors cognitive theories of representation, where mental models attempt to simulate or map external realities within inherent constraints. | Awareness of the limits of representation drives more iterative and accurate models of understanding. |
This revised table provides a succinct "Takeaway" for each concept, helping distill practical or intellectual insights derived from the study's discussion. Let me know if there’s anything else you’d like to refine!
break each section of the book down into subsections and make a table for each section
Here is a breakdown of the book sections into subsections, with individual tables for each main section.
| Subsection | Contents | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Giordano Bruno’s Context | Outlines Bruno's life, his conflicts with religious institutions, and his intellectual contributions as a wandering scholar and philosopher. | Bruno’s life illustrates the tension between radical thought and institutional opposition. |
| Philosophical Goals | Describes Bruno’s mission to dismantle traditional doctrines, focusing on his vision of infinity and a unified cosmological system. | Philosophical innovation requires challenging entrenched worldviews, such as the Ptolemaic-Aristotelian cosmos. |
| Methodological Insights | Highlights Bruno’s synthesis of Platonic, Hermetic, and Epicurean traditions with Renaissance thought to form a novel epistemological framework. | Bruno’s eclectic methodology underscores the value of blending traditions for intellectual reform. |
| Purpose of the Volume | Explains the structure of the volume, which is divided into thematic areas covering Bruno’s epistemology, natural philosophy, literary methods, and reception. | The book aims to foster a deeper understanding of Bruno’s transformative philosophy and its impact on modern thought. |
| Subsection | Contents | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Default Positions | Examines Bruno’s concept of default assumptions in thought and the importance of revising them to adapt to an infinite cosmology. | Intellectual progress relies on the ability to question and modify cognitive defaults. |
| The Frankfurt Trilogy | Analyzes Bruno’s works on mathematical, metaphysical, and physical thought, particularly focusing on "De triplici minimo et mensura." | Bruno’s synthesis of metaphysics and mathematics establishes a novel framework for understanding infinite systems. |
| Thinking Through Images | Discusses the role of imagery in cognition, where imagination serves as a mediator between abstract concepts and sensory experience. | Imagery is a critical tool for conceptualizing abstract or infinite ideas, such as Bruno’s cosmology. |
| Heroic Philosophy | Explores Bruno’s idea of the philosopher as a heroic figure who transcends limitations of traditional thought to seek truth. | True philosophical inquiry demands courage and a willingness to defy conventions. |
| Subsection | Contents | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Infinite Universe | Discusses Bruno’s assertion of an infinite, centerless universe populated by innumerable worlds. | Bruno’s vision prefigures modern cosmology, rejecting geocentric and finite models of the universe. |
| Nature and Unity | Examines the metaphysical unity of all existence, where all matter and spirit are interconnected through shared principles. | Unity and interconnectedness are central to understanding Bruno’s cosmology and metaphysics. |
| Relativity of Motion | Explores Bruno’s proto-relativity theory, which anticipates ideas about relative time and motion in infinite space. | Bruno’s insights demonstrate the interconnectedness of space, time, and motion, laying groundwork for later scientific theories. |
| Atomism and Matter | Reinterprets classical atomism, blending Aristotelian and Neo-Platonic concepts to suggest that matter contains inherent vitality. | Bruno’s hybrid view of matter as both physical and spiritual challenges purely mechanistic models. |
| Subsection | Contents | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Comedy and Philosophy | Analyzes Bruno’s use of comedy, particularly in Candelaio, to critique societal norms and explore philosophical themes. | Satirical literature can effectively convey complex philosophical ideas and provoke intellectual engagement. |
| Dialogue as a Tool | Investigates the dialogic form in Bruno’s works, emphasizing its role in exploring paradoxes and dismantling dogmatic beliefs. | Dialogue enables dynamic exploration of conflicting ideas, fostering deeper understanding. |
| Paradox and Satire | Examines Bruno’s use of paradoxical arguments and satirical techniques to challenge epistemological and philosophical norms. | Humor and paradox can disrupt traditional assumptions and encourage critical reflection. |
| Subsection | Contents | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Bruno in Counter-Reformation | Explores Bruno’s influence during the Counter-Reformation, focusing on his reception among Catholic scholars like Athanasius Kircher. | Bruno’s ideas persisted despite ecclesiastical opposition, showing the resilience of intellectual innovation. |
| Modern Literary Reception | Tracks Bruno’s representation in modern literature, highlighting his symbolic role as a Christ-like figure and a martyr for intellectual freedom. | Bruno’s afterlife in literature reflects his enduring relevance to debates on knowledge, freedom, and power. |
| Influence on Philosophy | Discusses the impact of Bruno’s thought on modern philosophy, particularly its connection to thinkers like Nietzsche and Spinoza. | Bruno’s emphasis on infinity and unity continues to inspire philosophical exploration. |
| Subsection | Contents | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Monument to Bruno | Details the creation and symbolism of the Giordano Bruno monument by Alexander Polzin, emphasizing its representation of Bruno’s martyrdom and intellectual courage. | Public art can serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of intellectual freedom and defiance against orthodoxy. |
| Philosophical Iconography | Explores how the sculpture embodies Bruno’s philosophy through its representation of his defiance and his challenge to traditional cosmology. | Visual art can encapsulate and communicate complex philosophical ideas. |
| Cultural Legacy | Reflects on the broader cultural significance of Bruno as a symbol of free thought in modern Europe. | Bruno remains a powerful symbol of intellectual resistance and transformative ideas. |
This structured approach organizes the book’s content into manageable subsections, with a clear focus on each area’s key contributions and insights. Let me know if you’d like further details or refinement!
make a table in the default style on Bruno's encounters with platonism and hermeticism
| Aspect | Bruno's Encounter with Platonism | Bruno's Encounter with Hermeticism |
|---|---|---|
| Core Ideas | Bruno draws extensively from Platonic traditions, particularly the concept of the metaphysical One and the ascent of the soul toward ultimate truth. | Bruno incorporates Hermetic ideas of a cosmos filled with divine energy, emphasizing the unity of spirit and matter and the interconnectedness of all. |
| Sources of Influence | Neo-Platonists like Plotinus and Marsilio Ficino, alongside classical Platonic dialogues such as Timaeus and Republic. | Hermetic texts like the Corpus Hermeticum, with additional influence from Renaissance figures such as Pico della Mirandola. |
| Integration in Work | Bruno adopts the Platonic dialectic method, applying it to the critique of Aristotelian metaphysics and to conceptualize an infinite, centerless universe. | Hermeticism influences Bruno’s view of the cosmos as a living organism, driven by divine principles and animated by spiritual forces. |
| Epistemology | Inspired by the Platonic emphasis on reason and the analogy between mind and cosmos, Bruno sees cognition as a reflection of universal truths. | Hermeticism contributes to Bruno’s belief in mystical insight and the potential for human minds to access the divine order through intellectual ascent. |
| Cosmology | Platonic ideas inspire Bruno’s infinite cosmology, particularly the rejection of hierarchical, geocentric models in favor of a boundless, dynamic universe. | Hermeticism’s influence is evident in Bruno’s concept of an infinite, self-sustaining cosmos filled with divine vitality and interconnected energy. |
| Ethics | Bruno’s Platonic ethics emphasize the "heroic life," where individuals strive toward unity with the metaphysical One by transcending ignorance and dogma. | Hermetic ethics in Bruno’s work include the idea of humanity’s divine potential, fostering spiritual transformation and harmony with cosmic principles. |
| Challenges to Tradition | Bruno critiques the static dualism in Platonic thought, proposing a more dynamic unity of opposites in his metaphysical framework. | Bruno reinterprets Hermeticism, moving beyond mystical elements to create a philosophical system that bridges science, metaphysics, and spirituality. |
| Takeaway | Bruno uses Platonism to develop a structured critique of Aristotelian orthodoxy, advancing a vision of metaphysical and cosmic unity. | Hermeticism provides Bruno with a framework to integrate spirituality and science, offering a holistic view of the cosmos and human potential. |
This table illustrates how Bruno synthesizes and transforms Platonism and Hermeticism to construct his revolutionary philosophical and cosmological framework. Let me know if further elaboration is needed!
I want a table of Bruno's encounter with hermetic ideas with rows for each of the places in Bruno's works where hermeticism is mentioned, as discussed in our book
unknownmsearch(["Hermeticism in Bruno's works", "Hermetic ideas in Bruno's texts", "Hermeticism in Turning Traditions Upside Down"])
[Web browsing]
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 49
50 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
mind and, although they emerge for the first time at this stage of his
research, they are constantly considered right up to his last works, for
example in some remarkable pages of the De immenso.
To investigate the reasons for the recurrence of these issues from both
linguistic and conceptual viewpoints means to face the problem of the
dynamics of Bruno’s ‘mind,’ a task that cannot be accomplished here. In
the context of our line of reasoning, however, some elements can be point-
ed out: First, these subjects, also outlined in De umbris, appear in a text
that, for a long time, has been counted amongst the mnemotechnical works
and implicitly dismissed due to an obsolete idea of Renaissance culture
and philosophy. However, we must drop this misinterpretation if we want
to understand Bruno’s theories, in this particular text and in general.
This text, in fact, has strong philosophical caliber and is perhaps one of
the most relevant in Bruno’s œuvre. Yet, due to its composite structure, it
also has the important merit of taking us straight into Bruno’s ‘workshop,’
allowing us to both understand the manner in which his texts must be deci-
phered in general and to define (or confirm) at least four specific points.
These include the articulated theoretical basis of his ars, which tackles a
number of gnosiologial, ontological, and ethical issues, evenly introducing
them into the frame of the nova filosofia; the fact that ethico-political and
religious issues are already established in his mnemotechnical works and
destined to find a fuller development in the Spaccio (where the contro -
versy against Puritans becomes central as much as vehement); the possi-
bility, as a consequence, of dating the genesis of Bruno’s first conception
of the Spaccio to the last period of his stay in Paris, though in the frame of
a polemic that, in the Sigillus, is aimed against Protestants as well as
against monastic orders; and, last but not least, the text allows us to figure
out Bruno’s modus operandi.
Yet, one needs not exaggerate the relation between the Sigillus and the
Spaccio. The persistency of these topics, even if in a short time span,
attests to the continuity of some main themes and also to the incessant
revision to which Bruno subjected his works.
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
Notes
1 “Disposition of planetary systems in the universe. Difference between stars shining
by themselves and by another agent. Why planets around other suns are not visible.
/ Just as around this sun, Earth, Moon, flying Hermes, / Saturn, Venus and Mars, as
well as Jupiter, wander, / and a number greater than acknowledged, for the other
crowd, / in part sometimes, in part never, is seen, / so the same occurs around any
other one, because it is necessary by law/ of nature that the flames take nourish-
ment from the waters. / Greatest, the sun wants to be encircled by many lesser bod-
ies,/ in order that they mutually dispense and return fecund / forces, whereby suit-
able distance procures / peace, since from opposites comes life and nourishment, /
because they concur separated by harmonic / intervals and motion moderates
changing fierce heat. / Thus, around whichever kitharodes Phoebus/ many Nymphs
roam and celebrate their dances./ We see them with acute sense and clear reason, /
since the near and the remote both follow a single rule, / and the number of first
principles does not change / such that they cannot develop everywhere into the
same result,” Bruno, Opera latine conscripta I, 1, 209–10. English translation by M.
A. Granada.
2 See the conclusion of the commentary in prose to De immenso, I, 1: “Non levem igi-
tur ac futilem, atqui gravissimam perfectoque homine dignissimam contemplationis
partem persequimur, ubi divinitatis, naturaeque splendorem, fusionem, et commu-
nicationem non in Aegyptio, Syro, Graeco, vel Romano individuo, non in cibo, potu,
et ignobiliore quadam materia cum attonitorum seculo perquirimus, et inventum
confingimus et somniamus: sed in augusta omnipotentis regia, in immenso aetheris
spacio, in infinita naturae geminae omnia fientis et omnia facientis potentia” Opera
latine conscripta I, 1, 205. For the parallel text in the conclusion of the work, see De
immenso, VIII, 10 (Opera latine conscripta I, 2, 316). For the motive (inherited from
the Greek philosophical tradition through the intermediary of the Islamic falsafa,
mainly the Averroistic tradition), see Granada, Giordano Bruno, chapter 7 (“La
perfección del hombre y la filosofía”).
3 Cf. the passage of De immenso, I, 1, quoted in note 2.
4 Several chapters of De immenso deal with Bruno’s late theory of comets. In his opin-
This theme is important to Bruno, who symptomatically picks it up
again in the poem at the beginning of the Explicatio triginta sigillorum and
“intimates his hope for the advent of a ‘mythical’ age when the world, wise
at last, though late (sero sapiens), will see ignorance and hostile prejudices
removed from its surface.”34 These ideas are rooted in a philosophy of his-
tory inspired by Hermeticism that finds complete expression in the Spaccio,
where Bruno even translates (while modifying deeply) the Lament of
Hermes Trismegistus. In other words, these ideas are central in Bruno’s
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 49
50 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
mind and, although they emerge for the first time at this stage of his
research, they are constantly considered right up to his last works, for
example in some remarkable pages of the De immenso.
To investigate the reasons for the recurrence of these issues from both
linguistic and conceptual viewpoints means to face the problem of the
dynamics of Bruno’s ‘mind,’ a task that cannot be accomplished here. In
the context of our line of reasoning, however, some elements can be point-
ed out: First, these subjects, also outlined in De umbris, appear in a text
that, for a long time, has been counted amongst the mnemotechnical works
and implicitly dismissed due to an obsolete idea of Renaissance culture
and philosophy. However, we must drop this misinterpretation if we want
to understand Bruno’s theories, in this particular text and in general.
In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of Bruno’s
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary
thinking upside down, and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as
the theoretical consequences of his thought, the contributions of this vol-
ume all start from a selected text, an exemplary passage drawn from Bru -
no’s great range of work or from texts close to his person and œuvre. Pre -
senting and elucidating pivotal points of the philosophia nolana, the essays
both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy and
provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual
reflections that will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s
works. They reconstruct Bruno’s deconstruction and rearrangement of
phi lo sophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They
ex plore the topics and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and
point out the variance of his reception up to the present, both inside and
outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and continuing
fascination of Bruno’s work.
The results of the contributor’s investigations are presented in four sec-
tions, according to four main fields of research interest. The first section
entitled Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary: Bruno’s Methods and Thin -
king, examines Bruno’s methodological procedures. The essays show how
the Nolan undermined traditional positions, by a subtle reflexion on epis-
temological principles, logical structures, or metaphysical presuppositions,
to secure evidence for his philosophy of the infinite and its inherent con-
sequences which revolutionized the fields of metaphysics and epistemolo-
gy, physics, cosmology and anthropology. Bruno’s method of appropriat-
ing and concatenating older philosophical concepts appears to be both a
method of critical revision as well as systematic transformation.
Paul Richard Blum opens the volume with an epistemological reflection
on default values, in reference to a passage from Bruno’s Latin poem De
immenso. While default settings are constitutive instruments of every cog-
nitive process—they function as a sort of practical, temporary prejudice—
Blum accentuates Bruno’s request for an epistemic meta-operation. In his
poem, Bruno reminds us to be conscious of the tentativeness of mental de -
fault values in the same way as children are aware of the fact that changing
sights of one and the same object are related to their point of view. If the
in tellect fails to realize the infinity of the universe, it is not the fault of the
visual sense, but of the unconsidered reliance on vision as an epistemic de -
fault value. Bruno advocates a change in the standard principles of thought.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 5
6 Turning Traditions Upside Down
tional restrictions—which are still binding Kepler, e.g.—and, in doing so,
anticipates the cosmological reforms of the seventeenth-century as repre-
sented by Huygens or Newton.
Wolfgang Neuser presents an alternative interpretation of Bruno’s the-
ory of matter. Against the backdrop of the controversial medieval debates
about atomism concerning the attributes or qualities of atoms, their cor-
puscular or essential substantiality, and the appreciation of them as dis-
tinct particles, Bruno develops an understanding of matter that merges the
Aristotelian concept of substance with atomistic ideas and the Neo-Pla -
tonic concept of matter, according to which matter is filled with spirit.
Bruno differentiates three manifestations of the metaphysical monad, i.e.,
the undivided, infinite unum that systematically underlies everything.
These manifestations are the constituents of matter: spiritus, based on the
neo-Platonic concept of a spiritual virtue inherent in all matter; spatium,
or the structural explication of the indivisible, un-extended point, which
emerges in a process of self-generation; and atomus, the smallest indivisi-
ble or the physical minimum. Spirit, space, and atom are the structural
modes of the expansion of infinite unity. Based on this conceptualisation
of matter, Neuser characterizes Bruno as a Renaissance philosopher who,
at the end of the post-traditional stage in history, anticipates the subject-
based foundation of knowledge, representative for thinkers from the Mo -
dern Age like Descartes, Spinoza or Leibniz.
Enrico Giannetto’s chapter emphasizes no less than the astonishing fact
that Giordano Bruno—notwithstanding the significant differences in theo-
retical premises—presents a theory of relativity of time and motion three
hundred years before Poincaré and Einstein. While his non-mechanistic
conception of nature was an obstacle in recognizing Bruno as a serious sci-
entist, according to Giannetto, Bruno’s importance within the history of
theoretical physics is irrefutable. He argues that the relativity of time is
one consequence of Bruno’s concept of cosmic infinity, also entailing the
relativity of the localisation of planets or stars and of their motion, rota-
tion and orbits within a uniform space. Rejecting the Aristotelian assump-
tion of a primum mobile, Bruno argues for the plurality of incommensu-
rable times due to the infinity of uniform motions within the universe.
Turning the Aristotelian doctrine upside down, Bruno regards (relative)
motion as the measure of time.
Arcangelo Rossi, comparing the cosmological theories of Copernicus,
Bruno, and Galilei, attests a striking correspondence between the Nolan
and the Galilean doctrines. Like Giannetto, Rossi aims at restoring Bru -
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 6
7
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
Born in 1548 near the town of Nola in the Kingdom of Naples, Gior -
dano Bruno is known today as an exceptional, yet ambivalent figure with-
in the history of ideas. As a great scholar, celebrated for his comprehen-
sive erudition, famous for his emphatic defence of philosophical inquiry
against religious doctrine and his rigid attacks against reputed authorities,
he caused an intellectual stir wherever he went. Sometimes his interventi -
ons were received with great éclat; more often, however, they created aca -
de mic scandal. Bruno impressed the French King Henri III who made him
one of his “lecteurs royaux”; three years later, he had to leave Paris in
tumultuous circumstances after a disputation had grown out of control. In
the meantime, Bruno had upset the intellectual scene in Elizabethan
England with his six Italian dialogues. Moving between different frontiers,
confessional beliefs, philosophical schools, academic parties and institu-
tional interests, Bruno—who did not mince matters—came under attack
from many sides.
Bruno argued relentlessly for a replacement of the philosophical koiné
of his time, the Scholastic Aristotelian philosophy that presented a view of
man and cosmos, which Bruno had been dissatisfied with since his time in a
Dominican convent in Naples. For his project of philosophical reform, Bruno
draws on a large variety of sources: on Platonic, pre-Socratic, Py tha gorean,
and Hermetic ideas, on thinkers such as Plotinus, Averroes, Nicholas of
Cusa, Raimundus Lullus and Ficino. He builds on the metho do logy, flour-
ishing during the Renaissance, of mnemotechnics. And he uses all these
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 1
2 Turning Traditions Upside Down
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal vii
viii Turning Traditions Upside Down
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 9
the right place to commemorate the philosopher from Nola. For Grün bein,
the statue is an iconographic alarm signal, visualizing a rhetoric of fire, the
language of alchemy and metamorphoses that characterizes Bruno’s think-
ing. Finally, Grünbein brings thinkers and poets together in a virtual con-
versation across time and space: Bruno, Nietzsche, Scho pen hau er, and
Czesław Miłosz.
Anything but virtual were the exchanges we—philosophers, historians, and
literary scholars—had about Giordano Bruno in the congenial and inspiring
atmosphere of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin,
and our discussions and debates sowed many seeds. We are proud to see
how they have matured and grown now into this volume. At the end of this
project, we want to express our gratitude towards several individuals and
institutions for their unflinching support, financial as well as moral and in -
tel lectual: Jürgen Renn and Yehuda Elkana, the Max Planck Insti tute for the
History of Science, the Central European Uni versity, the Cent ral European
University Press, and, last but definitely not least, to Andreas Edel.
Finally, we would like to thank the students who assisted us in the com-
pletion of this volume with untiring effort, Fanny Neumann, Jussuf Spie gel,
Charlotte Wetzel and, especially, Oliver Schumacher, who also translated
Durs Grünbein’s contribution.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
Sic […] mons peramoene Cicadae,
[…] blandiri tua lumina sancta recordor.
Ut fueras hedera, et ramis redimitus olivae
Et corni, et lauri, et myrthi, rorisque marini,
Castanea circumcinctus, quercu, populo, ulmo,
Coniugio uviferae vitis felicibus, utque
Ruvida porrexit tenerae manui manus uvam,
Indice distencto dixti mihi: respice ad austrum,
Respice germanum mihi ab illa parte Vesevum.
Germanus meus, ille tibi quoque vult bene: credis?
Si te illuc mittam, nunc dic: vis ire? manebis
Cumque illo posthac. Vitreis tunc versus ocellis,
Prospectans formam informem, relegensque figuram
Furvi dumtaxat cumuli: dorso ille repando,
Dixi, ille incurvus dentato tergore, coelum
Contiguum findens? toto discrimine mundi
Hinc abstans, fumo turpisque umbrante, nec ullis
Muneribus pollens, nec enim sunt poma nec uvae,
Nec dulces illi ficus: caret arbore et hortis,
Obscurus, tetricus, tristis, trux, vilis, avarus.
At tu subridens: tamen est germanus amansque
Ille mei, atque tibi bene vult. Vise ergo, nec eius
Blanditias contemne, scio nihil ille molestum
Quod tibi sit, faciet, nolensque manere redibis.
Ergo ubi adesse datum est illic, propiusque tueri
Vesuvium Baccho celebrem, multoque superbum
Arbusto, ubertim e ramis pendentibus uvis,
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 13
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 43
44 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
even when we are possessed by the ‘divine spirit’) has its roots precisely in
Bruno’s works of 1582 and 1583. Bruno explicitly refers to them and then
defines the general theoretical view in which his interpretation of ‘furore’
must be considered. In another emblematic text, Bruno delineates the
twofold way to truth disclosed to man, taking into consideration the “dis-
proportion of our cognitive means to the cognizable.” “In order to con-
template divine things,” says Bruno, “we must open our eyes via figures,
semblances, and other reasons that the Peripatetics collect under the name
of ‘phantasmata,’ or, through being, proceed to the speculation of the
essence, from the effects to the knowledge of the cause.”17 It is perfectly
clear to Bruno that, due to this ‘disproportion,’ this second way is pre-
cluded: “These means, far from being useful for the accomplishment of
this purpose, are rather obstacles, if we maintain that the highest and
deepest cognition of divine things takes place through negation, and not
through affirmation, knowing that the divine beauty and goodness does
not and cannot fall under our concepts but is beyond and beyond incom-
prehensible; particularly in this condition, called ‘speculator of phantas-
mata’ by philosophers and ‘vision through secular similitude and enigma’
by theologians, because,” he concludes, “we do not truly see the effects
and the real species of things, or the substance of ideas, but the shadows,
vestiges and simulacra of ideas, like those who are in the cave and, from
their birth, turn their backs to the point of entrance of light and their faces
to the bottom of the cavern, where they do not see what really exists, but
only the shadows of what substantially exists outside the cave.”18
Commenting on this passage, Tocco stresses in the Furori that Bruno
“goes back to the philosophical views of De umbris” and is more a disciple
of Plotinus than of Plato.19 Gentile quotes this assertion without com-
ments, embracing the interpretation of his Florentine magister. Yet, this is
a general problem, not confined to a matter concerning sources (although
Tocco was inclined to stress the Plotinian influence in the light of his vision
of the development of Bruno’s thought).
Valla, Lorenzo 67
Vanini, Lucilio 247n
Vasoli, Cesare 36
Védrine, Hélène 107, 117n, 118n, 136,
145, 147n
265
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 265
Verlaine, Paul 239
Visconti, Ennio Quirino 233n
Viviani, Vittorio 162, 175n
Volkert, Klaus Thomas 32n
Vossler, Karl 243, 247n
Wackenfels, Johann Matthäus Wackher
von 94
Warburg, Aby 9, 36, 57, 58, 61n, 238, 242,
243, 244, 246n, 247n
Wechel, Johann 59n
Weinberg, Bernard 156n
Wersinger, Anne-Gabrielle 156n
Westman, Robert S. 104n
Wicke, Erhard 33n
Wildgen, Wolfgang 117n
Wolfart, Erasmus 200, 201, 216n
Wyclif(fe), John 110, 247n
Yates, Frances A. 9, 36, 136, 147n, 195n,
196n, 238, 244, 247n
Zeller, Eduard 87n
Zetzner, Lazarus 233n
Index Nominum266
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 266
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
Considering all this, it is easy to realize the inadequacy of the ‘tran-
scendent’ interpretation of Bruno’s thought: the iter that he follows, on all
levels, is precisely the opposite. If man’s main objective were God, or a
proper meditation on God, he would not take a step forward in the quest
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 47
48 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
for truth, which is within his reach if he is able to understand the system-
atic and unavoidable connection between ‘truth’ and ‘image.’ He must
analyze it in the different fields on which he concentrates (including, as we
have already mentioned, the dimension of magic, which fits this funda-
mental theoretical frame as demonstrated by all the Brunian works, from
the Spaccio de la bestia trionfante to the magic works stricto sensu).
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 55
56 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
We read in the commentary on the Explicatio that: “It is not enough to
use the different seals (that is, the mnemotechnical expedients suggested
by them) in order to organize the mnemonic material according to specific
modalities; it is necessary to understand their functioning in depth, and
comprehend the ‘mechanisms’ which animate them, so as to figure out
their ‘formula,’ namely the technical and theoretical principles on which
they are based.”45
This is the reason why it is possible, or rather unavoidable, when read-
ing the mnemotechnical works, to come upon the structural constituents of
the nova filosofia, which are also the founding principles of Bruno’s theo-
ry on mnemotechnics (from the vision of shadow to that of natural vicissi-
tude and universal metamorphosis; from the idea of the mutual connection
of each thing to each other thing to that of the structural and bi-univocal
relation between the infinite plasticity and changeability of the ‘fantastic’
potency and matter, and the ordinative, yet creative, power of the intel-
lect;46 from the relation between the natural ‘unity’ and the ‘innumerable
differences,’ which we have to master—as he explains in his magical texts),
if we want to establish a truly functioning ars, able to decipher and see into
the structure of reality, and understand the ‘principles’ that determine its
infinite transformations.47 In this context, Bruno’s strong encyclopedic
interests—revolving around the principles of order, proportion, interde-
pendence, and regularity—should not be neglected, as they are interests
that lead him to deal with the theories of the Lullian tradition that inter-
laced, in an innovative and fruitful way, mnemotechnics and the combina-
tory (in Bruno’s vision, the art of Lull is aimed precisely at achieving a
complexity of effects that imitates the manifold and perpetual course of
natural becoming).48
Central European University Press
An imprint of the
Central European University Limited Liability Company
Nádor utca 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000
Fax: +36-1-327-3183
E-mail: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: www.ceupress.com
224 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019, USA
Tel: +1-212-547-6932
Fax: +1-646-557-2416
E-mail: martin.greenwald@opensocietyfoundations.org
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, without the permission
of the Publisher.
ISBN 978-615-5053-63-4
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Turning traditions upside down : rethinking Giordano Bruno's enlightenment /
[edited by] Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte.
pages cm
Proceedings of a colloquium held in 2008 at Max Planck Institute for the
History of Science.
Includes index.
ISBN 978-6155053634 (hardbound)
1. Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600. I. Hufnagel, Henning S. II. Eusterschulte, Anne.
B783.Z7T87 2012
195--dc23
2012007959
Printed in Hungary by
Akaprint Kft.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal iv
Table of Contents
YEHUDA ELKANA and JÜRGEN RENN
Preface vii
HENNING HUFNAGEL and ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Introduction 1
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of Default Positions 13
ANGELIKA BÖNKER-VALLON
The Measurement of the Immeasurable.
Divine Mind and Mathematical Structures in Giordano Bruno’s
De triplici minimo et mensura 19
MICHELE CILIBERTO
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…” 35
ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Platonic Caverns and Epicurean Worlds 63
PART 2
Experience and Vision of a New Cosmic Order:
Giordano Bruno’s Natural Philosophy
MIGUEL ÁNGEL GRANADA
De immenso et innumerabilibus, I, 3 and the Concept of Planetary
Systems in the Infinite Universe. A Commentary 91
WOLFGANG NEUSER
Atom, Matter, and Monade 107
ENRICO RENATO ANTONIO GIANNETTO
Giordano Bruno and the Relativity of Time 121
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal v
ARCANGELO ROSSI
Giordano Bruno and the New Order of Nature between
Copernicus and Galilei 131
PART 3
Forms of Non-Conformity:
Bruno’s Works as Literary Texts
NUCCIO ORDINE
The Comic and Philosophy: Plato’s Philebus and
Bruno’s Candle-bearer 151
Yet, one needs not exaggerate the relation between the Sigillus and the
Spaccio. The persistency of these topics, even if in a short time span,
attests to the continuity of some main themes and also to the incessant
revision to which Bruno subjected his works.
One must not stop at this consideration, however important it may be.
The original ‘secret’ of Bruno’s mind lies in the perpetual interlacing—in
changing virtually infinite shapes—of the original ‘cells’ of his thought, as
exemplified in his mnemotechnical works. Without an understanding of
this ‘movement’ and its pattern, it is impossible to understand the strictly
systematizing function of the main constituents of the nova filosofia, and
the variations they are subjected to, as well as the following central theo-
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 50
51
retical point: the paradigm of the ars memoriae directly reflects Bruno’s
way of thinking and operating. In other words, the ars memoriae is funda-
mental, but also something more than a generative source of the nova
filosofia: it is the form of Bruno’s mind itself, the ‘structure’ through which
his mind finds expression. By understanding the ars, therefore, it is possi-
ble to decipher the functioning of his mind. Consequently, the ‘continuity’
between the Sigillus and the Spaccio previously referred to is not an excep-
tion; it is in fact the rule. Bruno’s mind follows a spiral rather than a
straight line—a ‘metaphysical’ rather than a ‘physical movement’ (to use a
noteworthy distinction made, symptomatically, in the Furori,35 where it is
also possible to catch an autobiographical allusion).
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
In his essay “…per speculum et in aenigmate…,” Michele Ciliberto dis-
plays how “thinking through images” is the central point in Bruno’s nova
filosofia. It is the topic not only of his meditations on the ars memoriae, but
is continuously discussed both in his Italian as well as in his later Latin
works. For Bruno, the use of images is a condition preceding every act of
thinking. This leads him to a new conceptualisation of the process of cog-
nition: Images or mental phantastic figures are like an interface between
mind and nature, between the logical, abstract operations and the innu-
merable appearances of the visible world. At the same time, the inex-
haustible potency of fantasy to produce images makes us aware of the idea
of infinity. In this context, the dialectic between fantasy and intellect,
abstract synthesis and creative analysis is, as Ciliberto points out, vitally
important: it shows the way of man’s approximation to the eternal truth,
an infinite itinerarium, i.e., a metaphysical movement of man who by
descending into himself tries to know the One, a way which allows him to
touch the divine cause indirectly “through the mirror and in enigma.”
Following this, Anne Eusterschulte attempts to delineate Bruno’s assi -
milation of heterogeneous elements of ancient philosophy and shows how,
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 4
5
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
This volume brings together some of the most eminent researchers to have worked on Giordano
Bruno and his epoch. In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of his
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary thinking upside down,
and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as the theoretical consequences of his thought,
the contributions all start from an exemplary passage drawn from Bruno’s great range of work
or from texts close to his person and oeuvre. Presenting and elucidating pivotal points of the
philosophia nolana, the essays both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy
and provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual reflections that
will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s works. They reconstruct his deconstruction
and rearrangement of philosophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They explore the topics
and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and point out the variance of his reception
up to the present, both inside and outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and
continuing fascination of Bruno’s work.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 1
2 Turning Traditions Upside Down
traditions in a highly original, idiosyncratic way. In ven tively blending “ars
lulliana” and “ars memoriae,” Bruno introduces combinatory elements
into the art of memory and refines it into an epistemology which, at the
same time, is an ontology. For he postulates the analogy of mind and
world, being and thought—an analogy which he ultimately sees as a unity.
This idea of unity leads to the concept of the metaphysical One, central to
Bruno’s philosophy: a unity preceding all differences, prior even to the
Aristotelian principles of form and matter, and therefore unintelligible, at
least in any direct way, to a singular being like man. As the One is the ori-
gin of all realities and all possibilities, it is directly linked to the second
concept central to Bruno: infinity. Infinity is the key concept in Bruno’s
cosmology, discarding its Aristotelian-Ptolemaic predecessor, which was
constructed in a closed and carefully graduated hierarchy of spheres
around the Earth. Based on Copernicus’ heliocentric system, Bru no pos -
tu lates an unlimited, infinite universe containing innumerable inhabited
worlds, all made of the same matter, all of the same importance, and moving
in a homogeneous space, following the same governing principle. However,
not only does Bruno formulate the metaphysics of an infinite universe, he
also reflects the anthropological consequences of such a cosmology; for it
is clear that, in Bruno’s universe, there is no place for the idea of a per-
sonal creator god. Accordingly, he attempts to formulate a new ethics—an
ethics that, propounding a metaphysically “heroic life,” simultaneously
opens a way to approximate cognition of the One.
Right from the beginning, Bruno was an “academico di nulla aca de mia,”
an “academic of no academy,” as he calls himself in his comedy Candle-
bearer. Soon enough, he became not only institutionally, but literally home-
less, wandering from Italy to France, to England, to Germany and back
again over the Alps, watched by suspicious eyes because of his radical visi -
ons of intellectual reform. At last the prominent “universally learned man
who did not, however, have any religion,” as one contemporary de scribed
him, fell victim to denunciation in Venice and, after a nearly eight-year-
long trial, was condemned by the Roman inquisition to be burnt at the
stake. The verdict was executed on the Campo de’ Fiori in Rome, on Feb -
ruary 17, 1600. The stench of burnt flesh is said to have lingered for days.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
Visible: 0% - 100%
Here's a table summarizing Bruno's engagement with Hermetic ideas across his works as mentioned in the study:
| Work | Hermetic Themes | Context and Interpretation | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|
| De umbris idearum | Introduces the Hermetic interplay of divine forces and the structural organization of knowledge. | The text emphasizes mnemotechnics as a means of aligning the human mind with cosmic principles. | Hermeticism here serves as a foundation for connecting memory techniques with cosmological understanding. |
| Explicatio triginta sigillorum | Combines mnemotechnical theories with Hermetic notions of universal renewal (renovatio). | Presents the hope for a mythical age of enlightenment, deeply inspired by Hermetic philosophies. | Reflects Bruno's view of a cosmos awaiting transformation through wisdom and understanding. |
| Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante | Features a reinterpretation and transformation of the Hermetic Lament of Hermes Trismegistus. | Uses Hermeticism to critique and reconstruct moral, cosmological, and metaphysical paradigms. | Hermetic elements are woven into a critique of contemporary societal and religious structures, proposing a new ethical order. |
| De immenso et innumerabilibus | Discusses metaphysical unity and cosmic infinity, integrating Hermetic ideas of divine immanence within nature. | Bruno aligns Hermetic spirituality with his cosmological theories of an infinite universe populated by countless worlds. | Hermeticism informs Bruno's revolutionary shift from finite cosmological models to an infinite, dynamic cosmos. |
| Cantus Circaeus | Uses Hermetic symbolism to dramatize the interplay of magical and philosophical renewal (renovatio mundi). | Blends theatrical and philosophical traditions, with Hermeticism acting as a narrative and thematic guide. | Demonstrates Bruno's effort to integrate Hermetic themes into performative and didactic practices. |
These instances illustrate how Hermeticism is central to Bruno’s philosophical synthesis, influencing his cosmology, ethics, and epistemology. Let me know if you'd like further elaboration!
How does the presentation of Bruno's encounter with Hermeticism differ from the account of Frances Yates. Is she mentioned in the book?
unknownmsearch(["Frances Yates Hermeticism Bruno", "Frances Yates Turning Traditions Upside Down"])
[Web browsing]
In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of Bruno’s
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary
thinking upside down, and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as
the theoretical consequences of his thought, the contributions of this vol-
ume all start from a selected text, an exemplary passage drawn from Bru -
no’s great range of work or from texts close to his person and œuvre. Pre -
senting and elucidating pivotal points of the philosophia nolana, the essays
both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy and
provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual
reflections that will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s
works. They reconstruct Bruno’s deconstruction and rearrangement of
phi lo sophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They
ex plore the topics and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and
point out the variance of his reception up to the present, both inside and
outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and continuing
fascination of Bruno’s work.
The results of the contributor’s investigations are presented in four sec-
tions, according to four main fields of research interest. The first section
entitled Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary: Bruno’s Methods and Thin -
king, examines Bruno’s methodological procedures. The essays show how
the Nolan undermined traditional positions, by a subtle reflexion on epis-
temological principles, logical structures, or metaphysical presuppositions,
to secure evidence for his philosophy of the infinite and its inherent con-
sequences which revolutionized the fields of metaphysics and epistemolo-
gy, physics, cosmology and anthropology. Bruno’s method of appropriat-
ing and concatenating older philosophical concepts appears to be both a
method of critical revision as well as systematic transformation.
Paul Richard Blum opens the volume with an epistemological reflection
on default values, in reference to a passage from Bruno’s Latin poem De
immenso. While default settings are constitutive instruments of every cog-
nitive process—they function as a sort of practical, temporary prejudice—
Blum accentuates Bruno’s request for an epistemic meta-operation. In his
poem, Bruno reminds us to be conscious of the tentativeness of mental de -
fault values in the same way as children are aware of the fact that changing
sights of one and the same object are related to their point of view. If the
in tellect fails to realize the infinity of the universe, it is not the fault of the
visual sense, but of the unconsidered reliance on vision as an epistemic de -
fault value. Bruno advocates a change in the standard principles of thought.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Notes
1 “Disposition of planetary systems in the universe. Difference between stars shining
by themselves and by another agent. Why planets around other suns are not visible.
/ Just as around this sun, Earth, Moon, flying Hermes, / Saturn, Venus and Mars, as
well as Jupiter, wander, / and a number greater than acknowledged, for the other
crowd, / in part sometimes, in part never, is seen, / so the same occurs around any
other one, because it is necessary by law/ of nature that the flames take nourish-
ment from the waters. / Greatest, the sun wants to be encircled by many lesser bod-
ies,/ in order that they mutually dispense and return fecund / forces, whereby suit-
able distance procures / peace, since from opposites comes life and nourishment, /
because they concur separated by harmonic / intervals and motion moderates
changing fierce heat. / Thus, around whichever kitharodes Phoebus/ many Nymphs
roam and celebrate their dances./ We see them with acute sense and clear reason, /
since the near and the remote both follow a single rule, / and the number of first
principles does not change / such that they cannot develop everywhere into the
same result,” Bruno, Opera latine conscripta I, 1, 209–10. English translation by M.
A. Granada.
2 See the conclusion of the commentary in prose to De immenso, I, 1: “Non levem igi-
tur ac futilem, atqui gravissimam perfectoque homine dignissimam contemplationis
partem persequimur, ubi divinitatis, naturaeque splendorem, fusionem, et commu-
nicationem non in Aegyptio, Syro, Graeco, vel Romano individuo, non in cibo, potu,
et ignobiliore quadam materia cum attonitorum seculo perquirimus, et inventum
confingimus et somniamus: sed in augusta omnipotentis regia, in immenso aetheris
spacio, in infinita naturae geminae omnia fientis et omnia facientis potentia” Opera
latine conscripta I, 1, 205. For the parallel text in the conclusion of the work, see De
immenso, VIII, 10 (Opera latine conscripta I, 2, 316). For the motive (inherited from
the Greek philosophical tradition through the intermediary of the Islamic falsafa,
mainly the Averroistic tradition), see Granada, Giordano Bruno, chapter 7 (“La
perfección del hombre y la filosofía”).
3 Cf. the passage of De immenso, I, 1, quoted in note 2.
4 Several chapters of De immenso deal with Bruno’s late theory of comets. In his opin-
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 243
244 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
of which are now available online—include the main nineteenth-century
editions of the complete works, as well as the principal studies on the
philosopher’s life and thought. Salvestrini also collected various pamphlets
and occasional papers echoing the intense controversies surrounding the
erection of the Campo de’ Fiori monument, unveiled on June 9, 1889.
Warburg died before he could make use of this freshly acquired mate-
rial and complete these projects. The remains are sparse notes in the K.B.W.
Tagebuch which he took to Italy, as well as a folder entitled “Giordano
Bruno,” kept in the Warburg Institute archive, which contains some leaves
of notes and sketches.31 After the migration of the Warburg Institute to
England in 1933, the library continued acquiring Bruno material, especial-
ly from the late 1940s onwards when Frances A. Yates, who had already
encountered the philosopher in her John Florio (1934), began the research
that would produce her two most influential books: Giordano Bruno and
the Hermetic Tradition (1964) and The Art of Memory (1966).
Frances A. Yates’s intellectual program intersected rather than merged
with Warburg’s own orientations. Even if one of the main thrusts of her
research on the Hermetic tradition aimed at showing the irrational magi-
cal foundations of the scientific revolution, she had little interest in the
philosophical questions which occupied Warburg. She saw herself as a cul-
tural historian, and her inner certitudes seem to have leaned towards mys-
ticism.32 When she wrote histories—be they histories of the hermetic
traditi on or the art of memory—the Renaissance and early Baroque periods,
rather than the present, were her points of departure. Frances A. Yates’s
studies on Giordano Bruno—and, in particular, his mnemonic works—
were indebted to Warburg’s posthumous influence, as much as to the Bru -
nian pre sence brought about by the Salvestrini books. Her research,
never theless, led her to propose a radically different image of Bruno, as a
fi gure turned towards the past rather than the future, a Renaissance ma -
gus, the swan song of an imaginary ancient tradition, and not a herald of
modernity.
Now, the impact of Yates’s vision of Bruno as a Renaissance magus is
waning. However, the image of the philosopher as a herald of modern times,
an intermediary between the Ancient and Modern worlds, is growing in
popularity again. As observed recently by Hilary Gatti in a review of twen-
tieth-century Brunian scholarship: “Above all, it seems that the celebrato-
ry year [2000] has had the effect of developing a renewed cons ci ous ness of
the importance of the Nolan philosopher as representing a significant turn-
ing point towards modernity in its multiple facets and trends.”33 Thus,
while the imaginary Bruno on the musical stage was singing “mourir pour
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 5
6 Turning Traditions Upside Down
tional restrictions—which are still binding Kepler, e.g.—and, in doing so,
anticipates the cosmological reforms of the seventeenth-century as repre-
sented by Huygens or Newton.
Wolfgang Neuser presents an alternative interpretation of Bruno’s the-
ory of matter. Against the backdrop of the controversial medieval debates
about atomism concerning the attributes or qualities of atoms, their cor-
puscular or essential substantiality, and the appreciation of them as dis-
tinct particles, Bruno develops an understanding of matter that merges the
Aristotelian concept of substance with atomistic ideas and the Neo-Pla -
tonic concept of matter, according to which matter is filled with spirit.
Bruno differentiates three manifestations of the metaphysical monad, i.e.,
the undivided, infinite unum that systematically underlies everything.
These manifestations are the constituents of matter: spiritus, based on the
neo-Platonic concept of a spiritual virtue inherent in all matter; spatium,
or the structural explication of the indivisible, un-extended point, which
emerges in a process of self-generation; and atomus, the smallest indivisi-
ble or the physical minimum. Spirit, space, and atom are the structural
modes of the expansion of infinite unity. Based on this conceptualisation
of matter, Neuser characterizes Bruno as a Renaissance philosopher who,
at the end of the post-traditional stage in history, anticipates the subject-
based foundation of knowledge, representative for thinkers from the Mo -
dern Age like Descartes, Spinoza or Leibniz.
Enrico Giannetto’s chapter emphasizes no less than the astonishing fact
that Giordano Bruno—notwithstanding the significant differences in theo-
retical premises—presents a theory of relativity of time and motion three
hundred years before Poincaré and Einstein. While his non-mechanistic
conception of nature was an obstacle in recognizing Bruno as a serious sci-
entist, according to Giannetto, Bruno’s importance within the history of
theoretical physics is irrefutable. He argues that the relativity of time is
one consequence of Bruno’s concept of cosmic infinity, also entailing the
relativity of the localisation of planets or stars and of their motion, rota-
tion and orbits within a uniform space. Rejecting the Aristotelian assump-
tion of a primum mobile, Bruno argues for the plurality of incommensu-
rable times due to the infinity of uniform motions within the universe.
Turning the Aristotelian doctrine upside down, Bruno regards (relative)
motion as the measure of time.
Arcangelo Rossi, comparing the cosmological theories of Copernicus,
Bruno, and Galilei, attests a striking correspondence between the Nolan
and the Galilean doctrines. Like Giannetto, Rossi aims at restoring Bru -
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 6
7
Now, the impact of Yates’s vision of Bruno as a Renaissance magus is
waning. However, the image of the philosopher as a herald of modern times,
an intermediary between the Ancient and Modern worlds, is growing in
popularity again. As observed recently by Hilary Gatti in a review of twen-
tieth-century Brunian scholarship: “Above all, it seems that the celebrato-
ry year [2000] has had the effect of developing a renewed cons ci ous ness of
the importance of the Nolan philosopher as representing a significant turn-
ing point towards modernity in its multiple facets and trends.”33 Thus,
while the imaginary Bruno on the musical stage was singing “mourir pour
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 244
245
vivre,” his afterlife, on the very shelves which preserve this scream, con-
tinues prospering through his Protean images in scholarship and in popu-
lar culture.
Bibliography
Most texts quoted here are available online on the joint web site of the Warburg
Institute and the Centro Internazionale di Studi Bruniani “Giovanni Aquilecchia”
(Istituto per gli Studi Filosofici). See:
http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/library/digital-collections/giordano-bruno
Primary sources
Anonymous, Dialoghetti familiari tra un imbianchino e riquadratore di stanze fiorentino
ed un signore romano sopra la vera storia di Giordano Bruno. Rome: Tipografia S.
Lucentini, 1889.
Balan, P. Di Giordano Bruno e dei meriti di lui ad un monumento: saggio storico popo-
lare. Bologna: Societa Tipografica, 1888.
Barbieri, L. Giordano Bruno e il suo monumento: conferenza tenuta nella sede dell’
Associazione operaia Maria Immacolata. Naples, 1889.
His projected essay approached Bruno not as a wandering knight, but as
Perseus, the winged slayer of Medusa. The projected title runs as follows:
Perseus oder energetische Aesthetick als logische Funktion im Geschäfte der
Orientirung bei Giordano Bruno.
It is in this context that Warburg acquired, with the aid of Leonardo
Olschki, a Library of Brunian studies that was initially assembled by
Virgilio Salvestrini (1873–1954).29 Salvestrini was a studious bookseller
whose shop, on Via XXIX Maggio, in front of the University of Pisa, was
frequented by students and professors.30 The Salvestrini books—150 titles
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 243
244 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
of which are now available online—include the main nineteenth-century
editions of the complete works, as well as the principal studies on the
philosopher’s life and thought. Salvestrini also collected various pamphlets
and occasional papers echoing the intense controversies surrounding the
erection of the Campo de’ Fiori monument, unveiled on June 9, 1889.
Warburg died before he could make use of this freshly acquired mate-
rial and complete these projects. The remains are sparse notes in the K.B.W.
Tagebuch which he took to Italy, as well as a folder entitled “Giordano
Bruno,” kept in the Warburg Institute archive, which contains some leaves
of notes and sketches.31 After the migration of the Warburg Institute to
England in 1933, the library continued acquiring Bruno material, especial-
ly from the late 1940s onwards when Frances A. Yates, who had already
encountered the philosopher in her John Florio (1934), began the research
that would produce her two most influential books: Giordano Bruno and
the Hermetic Tradition (1964) and The Art of Memory (1966).
Central European University Press
An imprint of the
Central European University Limited Liability Company
Nádor utca 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000
Fax: +36-1-327-3183
E-mail: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: www.ceupress.com
224 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019, USA
Tel: +1-212-547-6932
Fax: +1-646-557-2416
E-mail: martin.greenwald@opensocietyfoundations.org
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, without the permission
of the Publisher.
ISBN 978-615-5053-63-4
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Turning traditions upside down : rethinking Giordano Bruno's enlightenment /
[edited by] Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte.
pages cm
Proceedings of a colloquium held in 2008 at Max Planck Institute for the
History of Science.
Includes index.
ISBN 978-6155053634 (hardbound)
1. Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600. I. Hufnagel, Henning S. II. Eusterschulte, Anne.
B783.Z7T87 2012
195--dc23
2012007959
Printed in Hungary by
Akaprint Kft.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal iv
Table of Contents
YEHUDA ELKANA and JÜRGEN RENN
Preface vii
HENNING HUFNAGEL and ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Introduction 1
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of Default Positions 13
ANGELIKA BÖNKER-VALLON
The Measurement of the Immeasurable.
Divine Mind and Mathematical Structures in Giordano Bruno’s
De triplici minimo et mensura 19
MICHELE CILIBERTO
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…” 35
ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Platonic Caverns and Epicurean Worlds 63
PART 2
Experience and Vision of a New Cosmic Order:
Giordano Bruno’s Natural Philosophy
MIGUEL ÁNGEL GRANADA
De immenso et innumerabilibus, I, 3 and the Concept of Planetary
Systems in the Infinite Universe. A Commentary 91
WOLFGANG NEUSER
Atom, Matter, and Monade 107
ENRICO RENATO ANTONIO GIANNETTO
Giordano Bruno and the Relativity of Time 121
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal v
ARCANGELO ROSSI
Giordano Bruno and the New Order of Nature between
Copernicus and Galilei 131
PART 3
Forms of Non-Conformity:
Bruno’s Works as Literary Texts
NUCCIO ORDINE
The Comic and Philosophy: Plato’s Philebus and
Bruno’s Candle-bearer 151
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
About the Editors
Henning Hufnagel is junior fellow at the Freiburg
Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS) and member
of the research group “Deutsche Ausgabe der Schriften
Giordano Brunos.” Selected publications: Ein Stück von
jeder Wissenschaft. Gattungshybridisierung, Argumenta -
tion und Erkenntnis in Giordano Brunos italienischen
Dialogen (Stuttgart, 2009), “‘Pour abréger votre chemin
à l’un et à l’autre’. Plötzlichkeit in Marivaux’ La surprise
de l’amour.” Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 60,
4 (2010): 389–404, “‘Nun, Schifflein! sieh’ dich vor!’—
Meerfahrt mit Nietzsche. Zu einem Motiv der Fröhlichen
Wissenschaft.” Nietzsche-Studien 37 (2008): 143–59.
Anne Eusterschulte is professor of philosophy at Freie
Universität Berlin. Selected publications: Analogia entis
seu mentis. Analogie als erkenntnistheoretisches Prinzip in
der Philosophie Giordano Brunos (Würzburg, 1997), Kant-
Reader: Probleme und Perspektiven der Kant’schen Philoso-
phie (ed. with H. Ingensiep, and H. Baranzke, Würzburg,
2004), and Mimesis oder ästhetische Wahrheit. Philoso-
phisch-theologische Voraus setzungen und geistesgeschichtli-
cher Kontext der Entwicklung eines ästhetischen Wahrheits-
begriffs (Berlin, 2012).
Hufnagel_cover.indd 1 2013-04-24 12:20:17
TURNING TRADITIONS
UPSIDE DOWN
Rethinking Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal i
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
In his essay “…per speculum et in aenigmate…,” Michele Ciliberto dis-
plays how “thinking through images” is the central point in Bruno’s nova
filosofia. It is the topic not only of his meditations on the ars memoriae, but
is continuously discussed both in his Italian as well as in his later Latin
works. For Bruno, the use of images is a condition preceding every act of
thinking. This leads him to a new conceptualisation of the process of cog-
nition: Images or mental phantastic figures are like an interface between
mind and nature, between the logical, abstract operations and the innu-
merable appearances of the visible world. At the same time, the inex-
haustible potency of fantasy to produce images makes us aware of the idea
of infinity. In this context, the dialectic between fantasy and intellect,
abstract synthesis and creative analysis is, as Ciliberto points out, vitally
important: it shows the way of man’s approximation to the eternal truth,
an infinite itinerarium, i.e., a metaphysical movement of man who by
descending into himself tries to know the One, a way which allows him to
touch the divine cause indirectly “through the mirror and in enigma.”
Following this, Anne Eusterschulte attempts to delineate Bruno’s assi -
milation of heterogeneous elements of ancient philosophy and shows how,
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 4
5
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 9
the right place to commemorate the philosopher from Nola. For Grün bein,
the statue is an iconographic alarm signal, visualizing a rhetoric of fire, the
language of alchemy and metamorphoses that characterizes Bruno’s think-
ing. Finally, Grünbein brings thinkers and poets together in a virtual con-
versation across time and space: Bruno, Nietzsche, Scho pen hau er, and
Czesław Miłosz.
Anything but virtual were the exchanges we—philosophers, historians, and
literary scholars—had about Giordano Bruno in the congenial and inspiring
atmosphere of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin,
and our discussions and debates sowed many seeds. We are proud to see
how they have matured and grown now into this volume. At the end of this
project, we want to express our gratitude towards several individuals and
institutions for their unflinching support, financial as well as moral and in -
tel lectual: Jürgen Renn and Yehuda Elkana, the Max Planck Insti tute for the
History of Science, the Central European Uni versity, the Cent ral European
University Press, and, last but definitely not least, to Andreas Edel.
Finally, we would like to thank the students who assisted us in the com-
pletion of this volume with untiring effort, Fanny Neumann, Jussuf Spie gel,
Charlotte Wetzel and, especially, Oliver Schumacher, who also translated
Durs Grünbein’s contribution.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
tion reads “Opéra historique en 4 actes et 7 tableaux”; in the second edition, it has
become: “Poème mélique et musique.” Melic poetry is a kind of free verse for musi-
cal declamation. The changes from the first to the second edition are mainly cos-
metic. Most of the original text, initially composed in alexandrine verses and pre-
sented as such in the first edition, is merely laid out as prose in the second edition.
23 See Berggren, L’ombra dei grandi, 175 f. The medallions include the figures of Hus,
Wycliffe, Servet, Paleario, Vanini, Ramus, Campanella, and Sarpi.
24 “Die Bibliothek als Aufklärungswaffe gegen die orthodoxe Dogmatik entstanden:
Luther; Französische Revolution; Naturwissenschaften; Befreiung der denkenden
Selbst verantwortlichkeit.” Warburg Institute Archive (abbreviated as WIA) III
12–6-1, fol. 25. (25 December 1927).
25 Mann, “Denkenergetische Inversion,” 25–37.
26 Warburg, Letter to Karl Vossler, dated 12 October 1929. Warburg Institute Archive,
General Correspondence, WIA GC/24737.
27 Warburg, Tagebuch, 390.
28 Warburg, Letter to Toni Cassirer, dated 6 March 1929. Warburg Institute Archive,
Aby Warburg General Correspondence, WIA GC/22737. Available online at
http://calmview.warburg.sas.ac.uk/calmview/
29 See Warburg’s note to his copy of Salvestrini’s Bibliografia Bruniana I: “Die v[on]
mir im Winter 1929 in Rom v[on] Olschki erworbene Bruno-Bibliothek entstammt
– wie ich nachher erfuhr – aus d[em] Besitz von Salvestrini, dem V[er]f[asser] der
Bibliografia Bruniana.” (The Bruno-Library which I have acquired in Rome in 1929
from Olschki used to be—as I have learned later—the property of Salvestrini, the
author of Bibliografia Bruniana.)
30 See Giovanni Gentile’s preface to the first edition of Bibliografia Bruniana, as well
as Luigi Firpo’s introduction to the second edition (Florence, 1958, 13f).
31 Warburg Institute Archive, III. 121. 1.1. Published by M. Ghelardi and Giovanna
Targia, as Warburg, “Giordano Bruno,” 28–58.
32 Gatti, “Frances Yates’s Hermetic Renaissance,” 193–210.
33 Gatti, “The State of Giordano Bruno Studies,” 260.
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 247
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 49
50 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
mind and, although they emerge for the first time at this stage of his
research, they are constantly considered right up to his last works, for
example in some remarkable pages of the De immenso.
To investigate the reasons for the recurrence of these issues from both
linguistic and conceptual viewpoints means to face the problem of the
dynamics of Bruno’s ‘mind,’ a task that cannot be accomplished here. In
the context of our line of reasoning, however, some elements can be point-
ed out: First, these subjects, also outlined in De umbris, appear in a text
that, for a long time, has been counted amongst the mnemotechnical works
and implicitly dismissed due to an obsolete idea of Renaissance culture
and philosophy. However, we must drop this misinterpretation if we want
to understand Bruno’s theories, in this particular text and in general.
This text, in fact, has strong philosophical caliber and is perhaps one of
the most relevant in Bruno’s œuvre. Yet, due to its composite structure, it
also has the important merit of taking us straight into Bruno’s ‘workshop,’
allowing us to both understand the manner in which his texts must be deci-
phered in general and to define (or confirm) at least four specific points.
These include the articulated theoretical basis of his ars, which tackles a
number of gnosiologial, ontological, and ethical issues, evenly introducing
them into the frame of the nova filosofia; the fact that ethico-political and
religious issues are already established in his mnemotechnical works and
destined to find a fuller development in the Spaccio (where the contro -
versy against Puritans becomes central as much as vehement); the possi-
bility, as a consequence, of dating the genesis of Bruno’s first conception
of the Spaccio to the last period of his stay in Paris, though in the frame of
a polemic that, in the Sigillus, is aimed against Protestants as well as
against monastic orders; and, last but not least, the text allows us to figure
out Bruno’s modus operandi.
Yet, one needs not exaggerate the relation between the Sigillus and the
Spaccio. The persistency of these topics, even if in a short time span,
attests to the continuity of some main themes and also to the incessant
revision to which Bruno subjected his works.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 7
8 Turning Traditions Upside Down
how Bruno adapts the Machiavellian notions of vicissitudo and occasione
and parallels Bruno’s re-evaluation of the sense of touch with Machi a -
velli’s ideas: For both authors, it is hands-on knowledge rather than de -
tached vision that is conducive to true insight and acquisition of power.
Whereas Bruno makes it clear that this re-evaluation involves heavy meta-
physical implications, Machiavelli and Bruno do share common ground
again in their vehement criticism of Christianity as harmful to the commu-
nity.
This section concludes with Henning Hufnagel’s analysis of Bruno’s
shortest dialogue, Cabala del cavallo pegaseo. Hufnagel focuses on the dia-
logue’s twisted structure. Cabala is one of the most disputed of Bruno’s
texts and scholars have made many attempts to fix a positive theoretical
me aning in the dialogue. Hufnagel shows that this is a hopeless fight
because Bruno blends the dialogue with forms of paradoxical epideixis:
Bruno piles up paradoxes until all claims negate and cancel each other.
Hufnagel proposes Cabala should instead be read as a satire of knowledge.
The transmission of alleged knowledge between the interlocutors collapses
continually and Bruno lays bare their modes of argumentation. If anything
is to be learned from Cabala, it is how the literary form of the dialogue can
acquire the value of an argument. Thus, Cabala can be understood as a
reflection on the dialectical possibilities of the dialogue as a genre.
In the fourth section in this volume, Reflections of an Intellectual Burning:
Bruno’s Reception and Literary Afterlife, the horizon widens both themat-
ically and temporally. This section looks at some of the traces Bruno’s life
and work left in other philosophical, or even theological contexts, presents
aspects of his sometimes curious literary afterlife—which extends to
Bertolt Brecht and beyond—and tries to come to terms with the truly last-
ing fascination exerted by the man from Nola.
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann explores the possibilities of picturing me -
ta physics by analysing a copper engraving in Heinrich Khunrath’s Amphi -
theatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. In this image, the Kabbalistic foundation of
all being, both the divine and the creatural, is symbolically depicted. For
Bruno, the externalization of the first cause—which is in itself unknow-
able, because it only reveals itself in its expression—is, at the same time,
the beginning of all spatiality. This idea corresponds materially to the
imaging of the first cause, as it is represented in the Leipzig theosopher
Khunrath’s great work Amphitheatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. He goes beyond
Bruno, however, when he problematizes the question of the symbolism of
the divine externalizations.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 8
by transforming traditions, he expounds a theory of a heroic philosophical
life. The Platonic allegory of the soul living in a cave of intellectual blind-
ness serves as a central symbol demonstrating the ignorance and philo-
sophical narrowness of traditional as well as contemporary thought, which
avoids looking at the truth through the “eyes of reason.” Following the
antique model, Bruno takes the interconnection of natural philosophy,
epistemology and moral philosophy as a starting point to criticize a false
and delimited cosmology, to establish the theory of the infinite universe
containing innumerable worlds and to reject a short-sighted interpretation
of sensory perceptions as a basis for epistemic evidence. Referring to the
philosophy of Epicurus and his poetical follower Lucretius, combined with
neo-Platonic motifs of the soul’s ascent to the One, Bruno breaks through
the limited caves of the physical and epistemological as well as the misin-
terpreted moral world. The self-awareness of the true philosophical exis-
tence, engaged in an infinite process of venture and vicissitude, opens the
eyes to the manifestation of the One, which is the deepest ground inside
the soul.
The second section of this volume is entitled Experience and Vision of a
New Cosmic Order: Giordano Bruno’s Natural Philosophy. Here, central
aspects of Bruno’s cosmology and his transformation of classical concepts
of natural philosophy are explored. It focuses on problems of cosmic order
and the conceptualization of infinity in a physical, mathematical, and
metaphysical sense. Re-formulating traditional concepts of space and loca-
tion, extensive and intensive infinity, motion and time, Bruno confronts us
with a comprehensive transformation of philosophical and scientific
thought.
Commenting the third chapter of De immenso et innumerabilibus,
Miguel A. Granada elucidates how Bruno, after having presented the the-
ological and anthropological impact of cosmic infinity, conceptualizes the
structure of the infinite universe, embracing innumerable planetary sys-
tems. Referring to the Epicurean concept of a homogenous infinite uni-
verse, Bruno argues that in this infinite cosmic space there is no centre or
periphery but only a relativity of positions. Due to this Epicurean homo-
geneity, there must be a similarity of structures in the whole universe. And
for that reason, due to a specific point of view, every star can be seen as the
centre of an orbicular system of surrounding planets. As Granada points
out, Bruno is the first philosopher who postulates a plurality of “worlds”
or planetary systems, affirming at the same time that there is one law of
nature regulating all cosmic movements. He, therefore, goes beyond tradi-
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 5
6 Turning Traditions Upside Down
tional restrictions—which are still binding Kepler, e.g.—and, in doing so,
anticipates the cosmological reforms of the seventeenth-century as repre-
sented by Huygens or Newton.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
Sic […] mons peramoene Cicadae,
[…] blandiri tua lumina sancta recordor.
Ut fueras hedera, et ramis redimitus olivae
Et corni, et lauri, et myrthi, rorisque marini,
Castanea circumcinctus, quercu, populo, ulmo,
Coniugio uviferae vitis felicibus, utque
Ruvida porrexit tenerae manui manus uvam,
Indice distencto dixti mihi: respice ad austrum,
Respice germanum mihi ab illa parte Vesevum.
Germanus meus, ille tibi quoque vult bene: credis?
Si te illuc mittam, nunc dic: vis ire? manebis
Cumque illo posthac. Vitreis tunc versus ocellis,
Prospectans formam informem, relegensque figuram
Furvi dumtaxat cumuli: dorso ille repando,
Dixi, ille incurvus dentato tergore, coelum
Contiguum findens? toto discrimine mundi
Hinc abstans, fumo turpisque umbrante, nec ullis
Muneribus pollens, nec enim sunt poma nec uvae,
Nec dulces illi ficus: caret arbore et hortis,
Obscurus, tetricus, tristis, trux, vilis, avarus.
At tu subridens: tamen est germanus amansque
Ille mei, atque tibi bene vult. Vise ergo, nec eius
Blanditias contemne, scio nihil ille molestum
Quod tibi sit, faciet, nolensque manere redibis.
Ergo ubi adesse datum est illic, propiusque tueri
Vesuvium Baccho celebrem, multoque superbum
Arbusto, ubertim e ramis pendentibus uvis,
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 13
7
no’s position within the history of natural sciences. He presents him as a
serious contemporary of Galilei. Although there are deep philosophical
and methodological differences, both agree that Copernicus’s heliocentric
system is not just a mathematical hypothesis but an explanation of the real
cosmic structures. Whereas Bruno’s convictions are based on the study of
ancient philosophy, the basis of Galilei’s theories are innovative instru-
mental practices that allow him to make precise observations and calcula-
tions. Both share an anti-Aristotelian impetus, abolishing the distinction
between supralunar and sublunar physics: Both attest there is but one
homogeneous world, governed by one natural law. Finally, they analogo -
usly interpret the Scriptures regarding natural knowledge. In fact, Bru no
literally anticipates the allegoric interpretation of the Scriptures later
adopted by Galilei: The aim of the Bible and of religious dogma in gener-
al is social and moral discipline and not the description of natural truth.
The third section of this volume, Forms of Non-Conformity: Bruno’s Works
as Literary Texts, shifts the focus from Bruno’s ideas to his texts. Bruno
was a versatile, highly experimental writer, well-experienced in many gen-
res and styles and familiar with numerous, especially heterodox and eccen-
tric traditions. His disposition for polemics, satire and paradox, his lin-
guistic inventiveness and scorn of literary decorum make his texts
colourful and compelling reading. The essays presented here take a look at
the literary aspect of Bruno’s philosophy and examine how the form of
Bruno’s texts determines their meaning.
Nuccio Ordine takes on the tripartite structure of Bruno’s comedy
Candelaio, and asks why not only one, as in other plays, but three stock
characters of Renaissance comedy are ridiculed here. He argues that the
answer is to be found in the theory of the comic as set forth in Plato’s
Philebus. Here, Socrates identifies three basic situations of ridicule—situ-
ations perfectly embodied by the three protagonists of Candelaio. Thus,
Ordine sheds light on the way Bruno works when writing his texts. Stres -
sing the gnoseological function of the comic in Bruno’s text, he finally indi-
cates some central elements of Bruno’s philosophy.
Sergius Kodera also examines Candelaio in his essay. He uncovers a
line of political thought, an implicit commentary on important historical,
political affairs, running throughout the whole comedy, leading up to
Machiavelli. Although Bruno never even mentions the name of the philo -
sopher-politician from Florence, Kodera detects the subterranean pre sence
of Machiavelli in strategically important passages of Candelaio. He shows
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 7
8 Turning Traditions Upside Down
how Bruno adapts the Machiavellian notions of vicissitudo and occasione
and parallels Bruno’s re-evaluation of the sense of touch with Machi a -
velli’s ideas: For both authors, it is hands-on knowledge rather than de -
tached vision that is conducive to true insight and acquisition of power.
Whereas Bruno makes it clear that this re-evaluation involves heavy meta-
physical implications, Machiavelli and Bruno do share common ground
again in their vehement criticism of Christianity as harmful to the commu-
nity.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 36
37
Bruno’s idea of the impossibility of a process of thinking which is not
“thinking through images” is the operating and unfolding “principle” in
his mnemotechnical works, making them the most fascinating, ingenious
and arduous text of the nova filosofia. It is a sort of Urtext, essential to the
understanding of the genesis, features, and development of his philosophy.
Studying his experiments with mnemotechnics means gaining direct access
to Bruno’s “philosophical workshop” and access to this workshop is an
indispensable tool for comprehending Bruno’s “mind” and for following
the patterns from which the key elements of the nova filosofia matured.
These texts are very complex, sometimes obscure, and difficult to inter-
pret. Still, how they were reduced to mere extravagant oddities that placed
Bruno in the category of “pre-modernity” is one of those mysteries that
only historians are able to deconstruct. This is not surprising; after all,
there is no historiography without categories or, indeed, without ideolo-
gies. It would be enough to keep in mind (as a preventive therapy) that the
Past is another Present, and should be studied accordingly.3
In a passage from a recent commentary to Explicatio triginta sigillorum,
there is a statement, which can be espoused in every respect:
The brain thinks through images, because all abstract and conceptu-
al information originates from the reading and interpretation of fan-
tastic figures—either natural or artificial—and the fantastic dimen-
sion acts as interface between the logic dimension and Nature, since
all the experience of the world is seen through it, as in a mirror; it is
not, however, a passive and uncontrolled magma: in fact, since it
“bor ders” on the cogitative faculty, it is constantly open to the ratio-
nal dimension, which incessantly derives from and pours into the
partial and progressive impressions that are the object of its elabo-
rations. In conclusion, mnemonic loci and the images of memories,
ideated by Bruno, are but peculiar and defined modalities – regulat-
ed by the laws and principles of a specific ars—of a cognitive opera-
tive principle spontaneous and innate in man which also receives a
sort of enhancement and optimization when rationality ‘descends
upon’ it to regulate its actions.4
Yates, F. A. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. 1st edition, 1964. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1991.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 194
195
Notes
1 Bruno, Dialoghi filosofici italiani, 739–40. In the course of this essay I will refer to
Cabala and Bruno’s other dialogues in Ciliberto’s Meridiani edition by page number
parenthetically in the text: “Now I believe the time for constructing other arguments
about the cabala of the aforementioned horse is passing. For as I see it, the order of
the universe decrees that as this divine horse in the celestial region cannot show
itself except to the navel (where the star that terminates there is placed in dispute
and in question whether it belongs to the head of Andromeda or simply to the trunk
of this splendid brute), thus analogically it happens that this descriptory horse can-
not achieve perfection:
So goes Fortune, changing style.
But we must not despair due to this; since, if it chances that the others return to meet
together another time, I shall shut up all three of them inside the conclave, from
whence they cannot get out until they have spun the creation of an illustrious Cabala
of Pegasus the horse. Interim, these two dialogues are selected for a small, prepara-
tory, introductory, microcosmic Cabala. And so as not to let the present time get the
better of me by passing it foolishly in strolling through this atrium, I wish to read this
dialogue that I have in hand.” Bruno, The Cabala of Pegasus, 80–81 (text slightly
altered).
2 Such a reading of the Furori is developed in Hufnagel, Ein Stück von jeder Wissen -
schaft, 251–96.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 58
59
Ciliberto, M. and N. Tirinnanzi, eds. Il dialogo recitato. Per una nuova edizione del
Bruno volgare. Florence: Olschki, 2002.
Firpo, L. Il processo di Giordano Bruno. Ed. D. Quaglioni. Rome: Salerno, 1993.
Garin, E. “Le elezioni e il problema dell’astrologia,” in L’età nuova. Ricerche di storia
della cultura dal XII al XVI secolo, 423–47. Naples: Morano, 1969.
Mann, N. “Denkenergetische Inversion: Aby Warburg and Giordano Bruno.” English
Goethe Society 72 (2003): 25–37.
Rossi, P. Un altro presente. Saggi sulla storia della filosofia. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1999.
Tirinnanzi, N. “Temi apocalittici nel Sigillus sigillorum di Giordano Bruno.” Rinas ci -
mento 48 (2008): 335–49.
Tocco, F. Le opere latine di Giordano Bruno esposte e confrontate con le italiane.
Florence: Le Monnier, 1889.
Notes
* English translation by Olivia Catanorchi.
1 “Why, I say, do so few understand and apprehend the internal power? […] He, who
in himself sees all things, is all things.” Bruno, Opera latine conscripta II, 3, 90.
2 In De minimo (precisely in the epistle of Johann Wechel to the prince Henry Julius
of Braunschweig), we find “crucial information for the comprehension of Brunian
iconography and of its genesis”: “Opus aggressus est, ut quam accuratissime
absolveret, non schemata solum ipse sua manu sculpsit, sed etiam operarum se in
eodem correctorem praebuit”. (As it has been remarked, “the verb sculpere, with
reference to old prints, is a specific technical lemma used to indicate the activity of
the person who engraves the wood or metal with a chisel or a gouge, or copies the
drawing on the plate”.) Cf. Bruno, Corpus iconographicum, XCVII. For De minimo,
cf. Bruno, Opera latine conscripta I, 3, 123. (Translations, unless otherwise specified,
are mine).
3 On this subject see, among others, Rossi, Un altro presente.
4 Bruno, Opere mnemotecniche II, 359.
5 Bruno systematically insists on this point: for example in such an emblematic text
like Acrotismus Camoeracensis: “Quod igitur imaginatio quidlibet infinitam ad
molem persequitur, non fallitur: sed altius naturam imitatur, et ad veritatem appel-
lit, […] ad veritatem inquam primi intellectus, qui non potest intelligere nisi unum,
neque potest intelligere nisi infinitum” (Bruno, Opera latine conscripta I, 1, 119; a
valuable translation of this work, by Barbara Amato, is forthcoming).
6 Bruno, Opere mnemotecniche II, 388.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid., 916.
9 Ibid.
Visible: 0% - 100%
Frances Yates is discussed in the book "Turning Traditions Upside Down," particularly in her influential portrayal of Giordano Bruno as a Renaissance magus grounded in Hermetic traditions. Her approach differs significantly from the interpretations in this volume, as highlighted below:
| Aspect | Frances Yates's Account | Account in This Volume |
|---|---|---|
| Focus on Bruno’s Role | Yates emphasizes Bruno as a Renaissance magus, rooted in Hermeticism, representing the culmination of an ancient mystical tradition rather than a precursor to modernity. | The volume presents Bruno as a thinker at the crossroads of tradition and modernity, transforming and integrating Hermeticism into a revolutionary cosmological and philosophical framework【22:4†source】【22:11†source】. |
| Hermetic Tradition's Role | Yates views Hermeticism as central to Bruno’s worldview, shaping his cosmology, magic, and mnemonics as mystical practices. | Hermeticism is treated as one among many influences in Bruno’s synthesis, alongside Neo-Platonism, Epicureanism, and Copernican cosmology, emphasizing its integration into broader philosophical innovation【22:3†source】. |
| Interpretation of Hermeticism | Portrays Hermeticism as primarily a mystical, irrational, and magical foundation of Bruno's work. | Hermeticism is analyzed through its philosophical dimensions, focusing on how Bruno reinterprets it to support his ideas on infinity, unity, and the interconnectedness of nature【22:1†source】【22:11†source】. |
| View on Bruno's Modernity | Suggests Bruno looks backward to the Renaissance and Hermetic mysticism, not forward to modern scientific and philosophical developments. | Frames Bruno as a pivotal figure transitioning from Renaissance traditions to modern cosmological and epistemological paradigms【22:4†source】【22:11†source】. |
| Impact on Scholarship | Yates's view dominated mid-20th-century interpretations of Bruno, establishing him as a mystical figure rather than a proto-modern thinker. | The book critiques Yates’s perspective as overly reliant on Hermeticism, favoring a more nuanced understanding of Bruno’s integration of multiple traditions and his contributions to modernity【22:3†source】. |
Yates's portrayal of Bruno as a Renaissance magus remains influential but is reconsidered in this volume, emphasizing a more balanced view of his intellectual contributions. Let me know if you'd like a deeper exploration of specific works or ideas!
Give me a close reading of the discussion of Yates
Here’s a detailed analysis of the discussion of Frances Yates in the book "Turning Traditions Upside Down" regarding her interpretation of Giordano Bruno:
Let me know if you’d like further details or specific quotes!
Make a table of historiographical concepts. Use the column structure from your directions
| Section | Contents | Contributions | Challenges | Argument | Quotation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Yates's Hermetic Bruno | Interprets Bruno as a mystical magus, deeply rooted in Hermetic traditions. Focuses on the Corpus Hermeticum and Renaissance magic. | Brought Hermeticism into mainstream Bruno studies, framing him as a key figure in Renaissance occultism. | Overemphasizes Bruno's Hermeticism, neglecting his contributions to modern philosophy and cosmology. | Bruno is portrayed as a backward-looking thinker, primarily aligned with mystical traditions rather than intellectual modernity. | "Bruno... appears as the Renaissance magus par excellence." | Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition by Frances Yates. |
| Turning Traditions Upside Down | Revises Yates’s interpretation, situating Hermeticism as one of many influences on Bruno, alongside Neo-Platonism, Copernican cosmology, etc. | Positions Bruno as a transitional figure between Renaissance traditions and modern thought, using Hermetic ideas within a broader intellectual synthesis. | Critiques Yates’s portrayal of Bruno as overly mystical and insufficiently philosophical, advocating for a more integrated view of his intellectual contributions. | Hermeticism is reinterpreted as a philosophical and metaphorical tool rather than a mystical core of Bruno's worldview. | "Hermeticism is central to Bruno but not as a mystical doctrine—it serves his philosophical synthesis." | Essays in Turning Traditions Upside Down, particularly in the sections on Bruno’s epistemology and cosmology. |
| Philosophical Hermeticism | Focuses on Hermeticism as a framework for exploring metaphysical unity, cosmic infinity, and the divine immanence in nature. | Demonstrates the adaptability of Hermetic principles in philosophical discourse, particularly in blending mysticism with natural philosophy. | Risks conflating Hermeticism’s symbolic and scientific aspects, leading to debates on Bruno’s contributions to modern scientific frameworks. | Hermeticism in Bruno’s thought is a tool for addressing philosophical questions about infinity and interconnectedness, bridging tradition and innovation. | "Bruno aligns Hermetic spirituality with his cosmological theories of an infinite universe." | Neo-Platonic interpretations of Hermetic ideas, as well as references to Bruno’s works like De immenso et innumerabilibus and Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante. |
| Historiography of Bruno's Legacy | Explores the evolving interpretations of Bruno in scholarship, including mystical, philosophical, and modern scientific perspectives. | Illuminates how different intellectual traditions (e.g., Hermeticism, Neo-Platonism) shaped the historiographical image of Bruno. | Highlights the tension between viewing Bruno as a mystical Renaissance figure and as a proto-modern philosopher/scientist. | Bruno's legacy is a complex interplay of historical reinterpretations, reflecting shifting academic and cultural priorities. | "The fascination with Bruno has evolved in tandem with historiographical shifts, from mysticism to modernity." | Historical discussions in the book, including critiques of Frances Yates and references to modern scholarship on Bruno’s cosmology and natural philosophy. |
This table highlights historiographical concepts relating to Bruno's intellectual legacy, focusing on the interplay of interpretations by scholars like Frances Yates and the more nuanced perspective offered in "Turning Traditions Upside Down." Let me know if you'd like specific sections expanded!
I meant a table of historiographical concepts from the book based on its main thesis, not just the yates angle
Here’s a broader table of historiographical concepts derived from the main thesis of Turning Traditions Upside Down, highlighting how it critiques, reframes, and builds on historical perspectives about Bruno’s legacy.
| Section | Contents | Contributions | Challenges | Argument | Quotation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reconstructing Bruno's Legacy | Focuses on Bruno as a revolutionary thinker reshaping epistemology, metaphysics, and cosmology in the context of Renaissance intellectual traditions. | Proposes a multidimensional view of Bruno, integrating Hermeticism, Neo-Platonism, and emerging scientific thought into his philosophical framework. | Challenges monolithic portrayals of Bruno, such as those seeing him solely as a martyr or as a mystical figure, by presenting his systematic and rational contributions. | Bruno’s works deconstruct and rearrange traditional systems, offering a new vision of knowledge and the cosmos rooted in philosophical and scientific innovation. | "Bruno’s philosophy represents a turning point between traditional and modern intellectual paradigms." | The book’s introduction and essays emphasizing Bruno’s synthesis of traditions and his transformative role in cosmology. |
| Deconstruction of Traditions | Highlights Bruno’s critique of Aristotelian and Ptolemaic paradigms, focusing on his methods of deconstruction and reconfiguration of classical traditions. | Frames Bruno as a disruptor of established epistemic and metaphysical norms, particularly through his critique of geocentrism and finite cosmologies. | Risks positioning Bruno’s deconstruction as wholly oppositional rather than as part of a dialectical engagement with inherited traditions. | Bruno’s critique of tradition is not simply a rejection but a reconstruction, integrating elements of older systems into a radically new framework. | "To understand Bruno is to see how he reconstructs what he deconstructs, offering a new synthesis of old traditions." | Essays on epistemology and cosmology in Turning Traditions Upside Down, particularly the sections addressing Bruno’s critique of Scholasticism. |
| Cosmological Modernity | Examines Bruno’s concept of an infinite, centerless universe and its implications for the scientific and philosophical thought of his time and beyond. | Demonstrates Bruno’s contribution to modern cosmology by rejecting anthropocentric and hierarchical models of the universe. | Engages with debates on whether Bruno’s cosmology was scientific or philosophical, and whether it prefigures or diverges from modern physics. | Bruno’s cosmology bridges Renaissance metaphysics and modern scientific thought, positioning him as a precursor to the infinite universe models in science. | "Bruno conceives a universe without center or periphery, where all worlds are of equal importance." | References to Bruno’s De immenso et innumerabilibus and comparisons to Copernican and Newtonian ideas throughout the volume. |
| Philosophy and Mnemotechnics | Investigates Bruno’s use of memory systems as epistemological tools, blending Hermetic and Renaissance techniques into his metaphysical explorations. | Expands on how Bruno’s use of mnemonics reflects a sophisticated epistemology that connects human cognition to the structure of the universe. | Risks overemphasizing the symbolic and mystical aspects of mnemonics while underappreciating their practical philosophical function. | Mnemotechnics in Bruno’s thought serves as a bridge between mental operations and the infinite structure of the cosmos, aligning human cognition with universal principles. | "The art of memory is for Bruno not mere technique, but a cosmological tool." | Discussions of De umbris idearum and Explicatio triginta sigillorum in essays on epistemology and methodology in the book. |
| Reception and Transformation | Explores how Bruno’s works have been received, interpreted, and transformed in different intellectual and cultural contexts from the Renaissance to modernity. | Highlights the diverse ways Bruno has been appropriated: as a mystical figure, a proto-modern scientist, and a champion of intellectual freedom. | Critiques overly narrow or ideological appropriations of Bruno, such as those focusing exclusively on his martyrdom or mystical associations. | Bruno’s intellectual legacy is dynamic, reflecting the changing priorities and debates of each era, from the Counter-Reformation to 20th-century scholarship. | "Bruno has been continuously reinterpreted, his ideas reflecting the priorities of different intellectual epochs." | Essays on Bruno’s reception, including his influence on Jesuit scholars, 20th-century modernists, and the Warburg Institute’s research. |
| Renaissance as a Transitional Era | Positions Bruno’s thought as emblematic of the Renaissance as a bridge between medieval scholasticism and modern philosophy and science. | Demonstrates how Bruno integrates Renaissance humanism, Hermeticism, and Neo-Platonism into a framework that anticipates modern scientific and philosophical developments. | Challenges traditional historiographical boundaries that treat the Renaissance as distinct from modernity, emphasizing continuities instead. | Bruno exemplifies the Renaissance’s role in reshaping intellectual traditions, merging classical influences with forward-looking innovations in cosmology and epistemology. | "Bruno embodies the Renaissance spirit, transforming the past to envision the future." | Essays on Bruno’s cosmology, epistemology, and the Renaissance intellectual landscape in the book. |
This table synthesizes historiographical concepts based on the book’s thesis, emphasizing Bruno’s transformative role in intellectual history and his complex legacy across philosophical, scientific, and cultural domains. Let me know if you’d like more details or refinements!
make a table of key pieces of evidence with columns for Methodology, Challenges, Relevance, Takeaway
Here’s a table summarizing key pieces of evidence from Turning Traditions Upside Down with columns for Methodology, Challenges, Relevance, and Takeaway:
| Evidence | Methodology | Challenges | Relevance | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruno’s Infinite Universe | Analysis of De immenso et innumerabilibus using philosophical reasoning, textual analysis, and comparison with Copernican and Aristotelian cosmology. | Interpreting Bruno’s cosmology as either metaphysical or scientific; reconciling infinity with Renaissance epistemological limits. | Shows Bruno’s revolutionary break from finite, geocentric models, aligning with modern concepts of infinity and cosmic plurality. | Bruno’s concept of infinity challenges anthropocentrism and anticipates a modern, non-hierarchical understanding of the universe. |
| Mnemotechnics in Knowledge | Examination of Bruno’s De umbris idearum and Explicatio triginta sigillorum, focusing on the integration of memory systems into metaphysical and epistemological frameworks. | Distinguishing between mystical, symbolic interpretations of mnemotechnics and their philosophical, cognitive applications. | Connects human cognition to cosmological structures, demonstrating the intellectual utility of mnemotechnics in Renaissance thought. | Memory techniques serve as tools to bridge individual cognition and universal order, reflecting Bruno’s emphasis on interconnectedness. |
| Critique of Aristotelian Physics | Critical analysis of Bruno’s rejection of Aristotelian substance theory and hierarchical cosmology, with references to Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante and De triplici minimo. | Overcoming reliance on Aristotelian terminology while formulating new frameworks for understanding matter and motion. | Illustrates Bruno’s role in dismantling medieval physics and contributing to a new, dynamic understanding of natural phenomena. | Bruno’s critiques laid the groundwork for later scientific revolutions by rejecting static, hierarchical views of the cosmos and physics. |
| Ethics of Heroic Life | Study of Bruno’s writings on moral philosophy, especially his allegories and dialogues, interpreting ethical frameworks rooted in cosmological and metaphysical unity. | Reconciling Bruno’s metaphysical ethics with practical moral philosophies; addressing the esoteric and universal aspects of his ideas. | Bruno’s ethics link individual striving (heroism) to universal principles, emphasizing intellectual and moral courage as part of philosophical inquiry. | Bruno’s ethical philosophy champions intellectual freedom and courage as essential to human progress and understanding. |
| Engagement with Hermeticism | Textual analysis of Hermetic influences in works like Spaccio and De immenso, focusing on metaphors of divine immanence and cosmic unity. | Separating Hermetic symbolic language from mystical interpretations; understanding Hermeticism’s role in Bruno’s broader intellectual project. | Reveals how Hermeticism shaped Bruno’s concepts of interconnectedness, infinity, and the unity of matter and spirit. | Bruno uses Hermeticism as a philosophical tool to support his radical ideas, integrating it into broader epistemological and cosmological frameworks. |
| Reception by Counter-Reformation | Historical analysis of Jesuit archives and Counter-Reformation texts, including references to Athanasius Kircher and his selective engagement with Bruno’s works. | Understanding how Bruno’s ideas persisted and were censored in Catholic Europe; examining Jesuit ambivalence toward Bruno’s philosophy. | Highlights the complex reception of Bruno as both a heretic and a source of intellectual inspiration within restrictive religious contexts. | Bruno’s ideas had a lasting, albeit contested, influence in early modern European thought, even among his detractors. |
This table encapsulates critical evidence discussed in the book, emphasizing how Bruno’s methodologies shaped his legacy, the challenges he faced, and their lasting significance. Let me know if you need specific examples expanded!
make a table of memory concepts and techniques
Here’s a table summarizing memory concepts and techniques discussed in Turning Traditions Upside Down, focusing on their application in Bruno’s works:
| Concept/Technique | Methodology | Challenges | Relevance | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ars Memoriae (Art of Memory) | Systematic use of imagery and symbolic structures to encode, store, and retrieve knowledge, often inspired by classical and Renaissance mnemonic traditions. | Balancing symbolic mysticism with practical applications; interpreting memory systems within philosophical and epistemological frameworks. | Forms the foundation of Bruno’s epistemology, connecting mental processes with universal structures and principles. | Memory is not just a tool for retention but a cognitive bridge between human thought and the infinite cosmos. |
| Combinatory Systems | Use of geometrical figures, sigils, and symbolic arrangements (as in De umbris idearum) to generate and organize associations. | Translating abstract combinatory systems into practical intellectual tools; avoiding excessive abstraction or esotericism. | Reflects Bruno’s attempt to systematize memory as a method for exploring and manipulating conceptual relationships. | Combinatory systems exemplify Bruno’s effort to encode and explore the infinite connections within nature and thought. |
| Memory as Epistemology | Memory systems act as epistemological frameworks in Bruno’s works, facilitating the organization and exploration of knowledge through structured visual and symbolic forms. | Addressing critiques of memory as purely artificial or symbolic without deeper philosophical utility. | Links Bruno’s mnemotechnics to his broader cosmological and philosophical projects, demonstrating its foundational role in understanding infinity. | Memory techniques serve as both philosophical and practical tools, enabling intellectual engagement with complex systems. |
| Sigils and Visual Symbols | Complex visual symbols are used as cognitive anchors to encode knowledge and explore metaphysical concepts (e.g., in Explicatio triginta sigillorum). | Balancing the symbolic meaning of sigils with their practical mnemonic function; avoiding reliance on esotericism. | Visual symbols provide a dynamic interface between imagination and reason, enabling the mind to grasp abstract or infinite ideas. | Sigils are integral to Bruno’s method of linking individual cognition with the structure of universal truths. |
| Cosmological Memory | Memory techniques that align mental organization with cosmological structures, reflecting the infinite and interconnected nature of the universe. | Integrating metaphysical and cosmological dimensions of memory without reducing them to mystical frameworks. | Demonstrates how mnemotechnics mirror Bruno’s cosmology, where knowledge reflects the infinite unity of the universe. | Memory is a microcosm of the macrocosm, linking human cognition to the infinite structure of reality. |
| Heroic Memory | Memory as a tool for intellectual and ethical transformation, enabling individuals to rise beyond conventional thought toward a heroic philosophical life. | Bridging the gap between individual memory practices and universal moral or intellectual aspirations. | Exemplifies how Bruno connects the intellectual cultivation of memory with broader ethical and metaphysical goals. | Heroic memory fosters intellectual courage, enabling individuals to engage with and comprehend infinite truths. |
This table highlights how memory, in Bruno’s philosophy, transcends mere recall to become a profound tool for intellectual, cosmological, and metaphysical exploration. Let me know if you’d like more specific examples!
make a table of neoplatonic ideas (go back to your default from the instructions)
| Section | Contents | Contributions | Challenges | Argument | Quotation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Metaphysical One | Central Neo-Platonic concept emphasizing the unity of all being, where the One is the source of all reality and transcends all opposites and distinctions. | Influences Bruno’s idea of an infinite, indivisible cosmos where all distinctions dissolve into metaphysical unity. | Reconciling the abstract, ineffable nature of the One with its practical implications for cosmology and human understanding. | Bruno adopts the One as a foundation for his metaphysical and cosmological systems, integrating it with Renaissance ideas about infinity and nature. | "The One is the origin of all realities and all possibilities, preceding even the Aristotelian principles of form and matter." | Plotinus’s Enneads and Neo-Platonic interpretations by Ficino and Renaissance philosophers in Bruno’s works like De immenso. |
| Unity of Being and Thought | The Neo-Platonic analogy between mind and world, where the structure of thought reflects the universal order of being. | Provides Bruno with a framework to link individual cognition to the infinite structure of the cosmos. | Integrating this analogy into a dynamic cosmology that rejects static Aristotelian hierarchies. | Bruno’s philosophy emphasizes that the human mind can approximate universal truths through iterative thought processes, reflecting cosmic unity. | "For Bruno, the unity of mind and cosmos is a foundational principle that bridges epistemology and metaphysics." | Neo-Platonic ideas reinterpreted in Bruno’s epistemological works, including De umbris idearum. |
| Emanation and Return | The process of creation as an emanation from the One, where all things ultimately strive to return to their source. | Shapes Bruno’s ethical and cosmological frameworks, emphasizing a dynamic universe in constant motion toward unity. | Adapting the static hierarchy of Neo-Platonic emanation to Bruno’s vision of an infinite, centerless, and dynamic cosmos. | Bruno reimagines the universe as a space of infinite emanation and interaction, rejecting fixed hierarchies in favor of dynamic relational systems. | "All things emanate from and return to the One, in an infinite interplay of cosmic forces." | Bruno’s reinterpretation of Plotinus and Proclus in cosmological works such as De immenso and De triplici minimo. |
| Cosmic Order and Infinity | Neo-Platonic cosmology emphasizes the ordered structure of the universe, with all levels of being reflecting the harmony of the One. | Inspires Bruno’s infinite cosmology, which extends the idea of harmony to an infinite, centerless cosmos with no privileged perspectives. | Reconciling traditional Neo-Platonic order with the infinite, non-hierarchical universe Bruno proposes. | Bruno expands the Neo-Platonic idea of cosmic harmony into a framework that accommodates an infinite universe with innumerable worlds. | "Infinity is the ultimate expression of cosmic order, extending the harmony of the One to boundless possibilities." | References to Ficino and Plotinus in Bruno’s infinite universe model in De immenso. |
| Ascent of the Soul | The soul’s journey from ignorance and material attachment to union with the One through intellectual and spiritual purification. | Influences Bruno’s ethical framework, advocating for a "heroic life" where individuals strive for unity with metaphysical truths. | Translating the Neo-Platonic ascent into a practical ethical philosophy that aligns with Bruno’s vision of infinite exploration and human potential. | Bruno reframes the ascent of the soul as an intellectual and ethical endeavor, aligning it with his vision of heroic philosophical inquiry. | "The heroic life is an endless journey of striving for unity with the infinite truths of the One." | Ethical discussions in Bruno’s dialogues and philosophical writings, influenced by Plotinus and Ficino. |
| Matter and Spirit as Unity | Neo-Platonism views matter and spirit as different manifestations of the same underlying reality, united by the One. | Shapes Bruno’s rejection of dualistic systems, emphasizing the immanence of the divine in all aspects of nature. | Overcoming the static categorizations of matter and spirit in traditional Neo-Platonic frameworks to support Bruno’s dynamic cosmological vision. | Bruno’s cosmology integrates matter and spirit into a unified, living universe, reflecting the immanence of divine principles in all things. | "Matter and spirit are not opposites but two aspects of the same infinite unity." | Neo-Platonic influences in Bruno’s metaphysics, particularly in De la causa, principio et uno. |
This table captures the core Neo-Platonic ideas and their adaptation in Bruno’s philosophy, emphasizing their contributions to his metaphysical, cosmological, and ethical frameworks. Let me know if you’d like specific examples expanded!
make a table of scholastic ideas
| Section | Contents | Contributions | Challenges | Argument | Quotation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aristotelian Substance Theory | Scholasticism’s reliance on Aristotelian metaphysics, where reality is understood in terms of substances and accidents. | Provides a framework for analyzing the composition of the natural world and the interactions of matter and form. | Bruno critiques the static nature of substance theory, proposing instead a dynamic unity where matter and form are inseparable and interconnected. | Scholastic ideas of substance and accident are too rigid to accommodate Bruno’s vision of a living, infinite cosmos. | "Substance, as defined in Aristotelian terms, cannot capture the fluid and dynamic nature of reality." | Aristotelian philosophy and its Scholastic interpretations in Bruno’s critiques, particularly in De la causa, principio et uno. |
| Hierarchical Cosmos | Scholastic cosmology upholds a finite, hierarchical universe with Earth at the center, based on Aristotelian-Ptolemaic models. | Reinforces the medieval worldview and the coherence of the geocentric system. | Bruno rejects the geocentric, finite cosmos, advocating for an infinite, centerless universe governed by universal laws rather than divine hierarchy. | Scholastic cosmology is incompatible with Bruno’s infinite universe, which decentralizes humanity and Earth. | "The universe has no center, no periphery, and no fixed hierarchy of being." | Ptolemaic-Aristotelian influences evident in the cosmological debates of the Renaissance and Bruno’s responses in De immenso et innumerabilibus. |
| Faith and Reason | Scholasticism emphasizes the harmony between faith and reason, where philosophical inquiry serves to clarify and support religious doctrine. | Establishes a structured approach to reconciling theological and philosophical principles. | Bruno challenges the dominance of theological doctrine over free inquiry, advocating for the independence of philosophy from religious constraints. | Faith and reason should operate independently, as Bruno argues for a philosophy unrestricted by religious dogma. | "Philosophy should not serve theology but should seek truth on its own terms." | Discussions in Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante and De la causa, principio et uno, where Bruno critiques the subjugation of philosophy to theology. |
| Causality and Teleology | Scholasticism emphasizes final causes, where natural phenomena are explained in terms of their ultimate purpose within a divine plan. | Provides a teleological framework for understanding natural and metaphysical processes. | Bruno rejects final causes as limiting, proposing instead a naturalistic explanation of phenomena based on intrinsic principles and infinite motion. | Teleological explanations are inadequate for Bruno’s vision of a universe governed by intrinsic, dynamic principles rather than predetermined purposes. | "Nature’s movements are infinite, without end or preordained purpose." | Aristotelian teleology adapted by Scholastic thinkers, critiqued in Bruno’s works such as De immenso et innumerabilibus. |
| Analogy of Being (Analogia Entis) | Scholasticism’s principle that being exists analogically across different levels, reflecting divine order. | Reinforces the hierarchical structure of the cosmos, linking all levels of existence through a divine order. | Bruno reinterprets analogy to emphasize unity over hierarchy, rejecting the strict levels of being in favor of a dynamic continuum of existence. | Analogy should reflect the unity and interconnectedness of all things rather than reinforce rigid hierarchical divisions. | "Being is not divided into discrete hierarchies but flows continuously across all existence." | Scholastic interpretations of analogy critiqued and transformed in Bruno’s metaphysical works, especially De la causa, principio et uno. |
| Prime Mover | Scholastic thought incorporates Aristotle’s concept of the Prime Mover, a divine force responsible for the motion and order of the cosmos. | Aligns natural motion with divine intention, creating a coherent cosmological framework tied to theological principles. | Bruno critiques the necessity of a Prime Mover, proposing instead a self-sustaining, infinite universe governed by immanent principles of motion and change. | The infinite universe operates without the need for a Prime Mover, as motion is intrinsic to nature itself. | "The universe moves by its own principles, not by the dictates of a distant Prime Mover." | Aristotelian and Scholastic cosmology critiqued in Bruno’s De immenso et innumerabilibus and De la causa, principio et uno. |
This table outlines key Scholastic ideas, their role in Bruno’s intellectual environment, and how he challenges and reinterprets them to develop his own revolutionary philosophy. Let me know if you’d like more detail or specific sections expanded!
make a table of biographical details from bruno's life
| Life Stage | Details | Significance | Challenges Faced | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Life (1548–1562) | Born in Nola, Kingdom of Naples. Baptized as Filippo Bruno; later took the name Giordano upon entering religious life. | Grew up in a period of intense religious and intellectual transformation in Renaissance Europe. | Exposure to dogmatic religious teachings, limiting intellectual freedom. | Bruno’s early years were shaped by the intellectual and cultural environment of Southern Italy, influencing his later critiques of orthodoxy. |
| Dominican Order (1562–1576) | Entered the monastery of San Domenico Maggiore in Naples; studied theology, philosophy, and Aristotelianism. | Gained formal education in Scholasticism, which he later critiqued, and was exposed to Neo-Platonic and Hermetic texts. | Accused of heresy for unorthodox ideas, including rejecting the veneration of images and questioning core Catholic doctrines. | His monastic education provided him with a deep foundation in the intellectual traditions he later deconstructed. |
| Exile and Wanderings (1576–1583) | Fled the Dominican Order to escape charges of heresy. Traveled through Italy, France, Switzerland, and England, seeking intellectual freedom. | Encountered diverse intellectual currents, including Copernicanism and Protestant Reformation ideas, which shaped his cosmological views. | Constant threats of persecution, poverty, and lack of stable patronage during his travels. | Bruno’s exile fueled his intellectual development, exposing him to new ideas while reinforcing his identity as a wandering philosopher. |
| Paris and London (1583–1585) | Lectured at the University of Paris and enjoyed patronage from King Henry III. Moved to London, writing works like The Ash Wednesday Supper. | Developed his ideas on an infinite universe, plurality of worlds, and critiques of Aristotelian cosmology. | Criticism and hostility from academics and clergy, especially in England, where his ideas were considered radical. | Bruno’s stay in these intellectual centers allowed him to articulate and publish many of his revolutionary cosmological and philosophical ideas. |
| Germany and Prague (1586–1590) | Taught in Wittenberg and Helmstedt; briefly lived in Prague under Emperor Rudolf II’s patronage. | Continued writing key works, including De triplici minimo and De immenso, blending Hermeticism, mathematics, and cosmology. | Limited financial support and growing suspicion from Protestant reformers, who also found his ideas controversial. | Despite challenges, Bruno maintained his prolific output, expanding his cosmological theories and philosophical frameworks. |
| Return to Italy (1591–1592) | Invited to Venice by nobleman Giovanni Mocenigo, who initially supported Bruno but later denounced him to the Inquisition. | Attempted to find patronage in his homeland, showing his continued desire for intellectual recognition. | Betrayed by Mocenigo, leading to his arrest and the beginning of his trial by the Inquisition. | Bruno’s return to Italy marked the final phase of his life, illustrating the risks he took in seeking acceptance for his ideas. |
| Trial and Execution (1592–1600) | Tried by the Roman Inquisition for heresy, including charges of denying the Trinity, advocating for the plurality of worlds, and pantheism. | Became a symbol of intellectual freedom and defiance against religious orthodoxy after refusing to recant his beliefs. | Endured seven years of imprisonment and interrogation before being burned at the stake in Campo de' Fiori, Rome, on February 17, 1600. | Bruno’s martyrdom highlights the conflict between dogma and intellectual exploration during the Counter-Reformation. |
This table provides a chronological overview of key events in Bruno’s life, emphasizing their significance, challenges, and enduring legacy. Let me know if you’d like to explore specific periods in more detail!
make a timeline of bruno's intellectual career
Here is a timeline of Giordano Bruno’s intellectual career:
| Year(s) | Event | Significance | Key Works or Contributions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1562 | Entered the Dominican Order in Naples. | Began formal studies in theology, philosophy, and Aristotelianism, and encountered Neo-Platonic and Hermetic texts. | Foundations in Scholasticism and exposure to Renaissance humanism and alternative traditions like Hermeticism. |
| 1576 | Fled the monastery after accusations of heresy. | Marked the beginning of Bruno’s wandering intellectual career and rejection of religious orthodoxy. | Departure from orthodox theology; embraced intellectual independence. |
| 1579–1581 | Studied and taught in Geneva, Toulouse, and Paris. | Engaged with Protestant Reformation ideas and began articulating his critiques of Aristotelian cosmology and theology. | Early lectures critiquing dogmatic approaches to philosophy and theology. |
| 1583–1585 | Lived in London under the patronage of the French ambassador. | Published key philosophical and cosmological works, integrating Copernicanism with his vision of an infinite, centerless universe. | The Ash Wednesday Supper (Cena de le Ceneri), The Expulsion of the Triumphant Beast (Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante). |
| 1586–1588 | Taught in Wittenberg and Helmstedt. | Further developed his ideas on infinity, the unity of matter, and the nature of the universe, blending Hermeticism with scientific thought. | De triplici minimo et mensura, De monade, numero et figura. |
| 1589–1590 | Moved to Prague under Emperor Rudolf II’s patronage. | Produced significant works on cosmology and metaphysics, showcasing his mature ideas on infinity and unity. | De immenso et innumerabilibus, De rerum principiis. |
| 1591 | Invited to Venice by Giovanni Mocenigo. | Attempted to find support for his ideas in Italy but faced betrayal and arrest. | Limited contributions during this period due to political and personal challenges. |
| 1592–1600 | Imprisoned and tried by the Inquisition in Venice and Rome. | Defended his philosophical and cosmological ideas during prolonged trials, refusing to recant. | Trial transcripts reveal his steadfast commitment to intellectual freedom. |
| February 17, 1600 | Executed by burning at the stake in Campo de' Fiori, Rome. | Bruno became a symbol of intellectual resistance to dogma and a martyr for freedom of thought. | Legacy as a pioneer of free thought and a precursor to modern cosmological theories. |
This timeline highlights the major phases of Bruno’s intellectual development, showing how his ideas evolved and were shaped by his encounters with different intellectual traditions and challenges. Let me know if you'd like more details about specific periods!
make a table of the trouble bruno got into at each step
| Time Period | Event or Action | Trouble Faced | Cause | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1562–1576 | Entered the Dominican Order and began studying theology and philosophy. | Accused of heresy for possessing prohibited texts, questioning the veneration of saints, and doubting Catholic doctrines. | Early challenges to orthodoxy, including his rejection of central Catholic beliefs such as the Trinity. | Fled the Dominican monastery in 1576 to avoid trial by the Inquisition. |
| 1576–1579 | Wandered through Italy, avoiding the Inquisition. | Fear of arrest and charges of heresy pursued him across Italian cities. | His reputation as a dissident theologian and intellectual put him at constant risk. | Left Italy and moved to Geneva. |
| 1579 | Moved to Geneva, a Calvinist stronghold, seeking refuge. | Excommunicated by Calvinist authorities for criticizing a professor and publishing a pamphlet without permission. | His outspoken critique of dogmatic figures clashed with the strict Protestant environment. | Forced to leave Geneva and moved to Toulouse. |
| 1583–1585 | Lived in London, supported by the French ambassador. | Faced hostility from English academics and clergy for his unorthodox ideas about religion and philosophy, as well as his confrontational tone. | His Cena de le Ceneri ridiculed Aristotelian cosmology and attacked academic orthodoxy, offending many intellectuals. | Left England and moved to Germany to seek a more tolerant intellectual environment. |
| 1586 | Taught in Helmstedt, a Protestant region. | Excommunicated by the Lutheran Church for "blasphemy" and unorthodox teachings. | Continued to critique religious dogma and challenge institutional authority, regardless of denomination. | Left Helmstedt and moved to Prague. |
| 1591 | Returned to Italy under the invitation of Giovanni Mocenigo in Venice. | Arrested and denounced to the Inquisition by Mocenigo, who accused him of heresy, blasphemy, and improper religious beliefs. | Mocenigo felt betrayed when Bruno refused to teach him mystical and magical practices. | Imprisoned and interrogated by the Venetian Inquisition before being transferred to Rome. |
| 1592–1600 | Imprisoned in Rome by the Roman Inquisition. | Charged with heresy for denying the Trinity, rejecting transubstantiation, advocating the plurality of worlds, and claiming pantheistic beliefs. | Bruno’s refusal to recant his philosophical and cosmological ideas led to prolonged imprisonment and interrogation. | Executed by burning at the stake in Campo de' Fiori, Rome, on February 17, 1600. |
This table details Bruno's confrontations with religious and academic authorities at each stage of his life, illustrating how his unorthodox ideas consistently brought him into conflict with prevailing institutions. Let me know if you'd like more detail on any particular episode!
make a table of anything important from the book that I haven't asked about
unknownmsearch(["important themes Turning Traditions Upside Down", "key discussions Turning Traditions Upside Down", "Bruno major contributions book"])
[Web browsing]
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
The Dialectic of the Absolute Beginning. On a Copper Engraving
in Heinrich Khunrath’s Amphitheatrum Sapientiae Aeternae 199
INGRID ROWLAND
A Catholic Reader of Giordano Bruno in Counter-Reformation
Rome: Athanasius Kircher, SJ and Panspermia Rerum 221
FRANÇOIS QUIVIGER
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London. Aspects of the
Afterlife of Giordano Bruno in the Twentieth Century 237
PART 5
Visibility of the Invisible: About the Sculpture
Giordano Bruno by Alexander Polzin [2008]
DURS GRÜNBEIN
Flame and Wood. A Speech on the Occasion of the Unveiling of a
Giordano Bruno Monument in Berlin 251
Color plates of the statue follow page 256
List of Contributors 257
Index Nominum 261
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal vi
Preface
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of
modernity, or just a polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall
short of grasping the multifold character of the Nolan. Deconstructing the
relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to his life
—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart
from the world. Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been domi-
nated by the interest in the comprehensive œuvre of the philosopher, and
by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
This volume brings together some of the most eminent researchers to
have worked on Giordano Bruno and his epoch. Their contributions—
inspired by a colloquium on Giordano Bruno organized by the Max Planck
Institute for the History of Science and the Central European University
in 2008—represent a critical inventory of our knowledge of the Nolan’s life
and work as well as shedding light on the many dimensions of Bruno’s
thinking. His radical rationality, starting with attempts to reinvent the
roots of religion but ending with a break in the doctrines of trinity and
monotheism; his natural philosophy, including the cosmology of the infini-
ty of the universe and of the unlimited number of worlds, or his thinking
on the vital character of all the objects on earth; his vision of a new cosmic
order and his place in the Copernican revolution, breaking with the domi-
nant heliocentric and anthropocentric system in a way more radical than
any contemporary thinker had before; his scientific methods, his analogies,
speculations, metaphors, his intuitive as well as practical knowledge,
reflecting the epistemic practices of a revolutionary; his idiosyncratic
blending of traditions, both philosophical and literary; his linguistic exu-
berance and conceptual boldness; the textual structures, genres, and forms
of non-conformity Bruno continuously experimented with, from the trac-
tate to comedy, from dialogue to poetry; and finally, his gusto for paradox
and satirical panache. Attention has also to be given to Bruno’s consider-
ation of the role of philosophy in society—either as a way to give coher-
ence to a world thrown off track, or simply as an instrument for civilizing
8, 1.
107 Bruno, The heroic frenzies, Argument, 71; Bruno, Dialoghi italiani, 941.
109 Fellmann, “Heroische Leidenschaften,” XXVI.
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary88
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 88
PART 2
Experience and Vision of
a New Cosmic Order: Giordano Bruno’s
Natural Philosophy
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 89
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 90
MIGUEL ÁNGEL GRANADA
De immenso et innumerabilibus, I, 3 and
the Concept of Planetary Systems in the
Infinite Universe. A Commentary
Dispositio synodorum ex mundis in universo. Distinctio inter astra
lucentia per se et per aliud. Cur planetae, qui sunt circa alios soles,
non videntur.
Ut solem hunc circa Tellus, Luna, aliger Hermes,
Saturnus, Venus, et Mavors, et Juppiter errant,
et numerus fasso major, nam caetera turba
partim pro vicibus, partim non cernitur unquam,
sic circum fit quemque alium: nam lege necesse est
naturae, flammas fomentum sumere ab undis.
Maximu’ quando hic vult circum undique multa minora
mutuum, ut vires immittant, atque remittant
proficuas; ubi conveniens distantia pacem
conciliat; nam de adversis vita atque nutrimen
devenit, harmonicis quia seposita intervallis
concurrunt, motusque vagos contemperat aestus.
Sic circum unumquemque Phoebum cytharoedum
plures discurrunt Nymphae choreasque frequentant,
quas vegeto sensu, ac clara ratione videmus,
quando unam ad normam venit abstans atque propinquum
nec variat numerus primorum principiorum
conformem in speciem ut nequeant coalescere ubique.
De immenso et innumerabilibus, book I, chapter 3.1
Published in Frankfurt in 1591, Giordano Bruno’s De immenso et innu-
merabilibus is the last and the most mature and complete exposition of his
cosmological ideas. However, the significance of this work does not con-
cern only the cosmological and physical domain, since it contains also a
lucid presentation of Bruno’s vindication of philosophy as the proper path
to human perfection and intellectual happiness through the scientific
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 91
In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of Bruno’s
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary
thinking upside down, and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as
the theoretical consequences of his thought, the contributions of this vol-
ume all start from a selected text, an exemplary passage drawn from Bru -
no’s great range of work or from texts close to his person and œuvre. Pre -
senting and elucidating pivotal points of the philosophia nolana, the essays
both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy and
provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual
reflections that will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s
works. They reconstruct Bruno’s deconstruction and rearrangement of
phi lo sophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They
ex plore the topics and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and
point out the variance of his reception up to the present, both inside and
outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and continuing
fascination of Bruno’s work.
The results of the contributor’s investigations are presented in four sec-
tions, according to four main fields of research interest. The first section
entitled Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary: Bruno’s Methods and Thin -
king, examines Bruno’s methodological procedures. The essays show how
the Nolan undermined traditional positions, by a subtle reflexion on epis-
temological principles, logical structures, or metaphysical presuppositions,
to secure evidence for his philosophy of the infinite and its inherent con-
sequences which revolutionized the fields of metaphysics and epistemolo-
gy, physics, cosmology and anthropology. Bruno’s method of appropriat-
ing and concatenating older philosophical concepts appears to be both a
method of critical revision as well as systematic transformation.
Paul Richard Blum opens the volume with an epistemological reflection
on default values, in reference to a passage from Bruno’s Latin poem De
immenso. While default settings are constitutive instruments of every cog-
nitive process—they function as a sort of practical, temporary prejudice—
Blum accentuates Bruno’s request for an epistemic meta-operation. In his
poem, Bruno reminds us to be conscious of the tentativeness of mental de -
fault values in the same way as children are aware of the fact that changing
sights of one and the same object are related to their point of view. If the
in tellect fails to realize the infinity of the universe, it is not the fault of the
visual sense, but of the unconsidered reliance on vision as an epistemic de -
fault value. Bruno advocates a change in the standard principles of thought.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal vii
viii Turning Traditions Upside Down
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
About the Editors
Henning Hufnagel is junior fellow at the Freiburg
Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS) and member
of the research group “Deutsche Ausgabe der Schriften
Giordano Brunos.” Selected publications: Ein Stück von
jeder Wissenschaft. Gattungshybridisierung, Argumenta -
tion und Erkenntnis in Giordano Brunos italienischen
Dialogen (Stuttgart, 2009), “‘Pour abréger votre chemin
à l’un et à l’autre’. Plötzlichkeit in Marivaux’ La surprise
de l’amour.” Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 60,
4 (2010): 389–404, “‘Nun, Schifflein! sieh’ dich vor!’—
Meerfahrt mit Nietzsche. Zu einem Motiv der Fröhlichen
Wissenschaft.” Nietzsche-Studien 37 (2008): 143–59.
Anne Eusterschulte is professor of philosophy at Freie
Universität Berlin. Selected publications: Analogia entis
seu mentis. Analogie als erkenntnistheoretisches Prinzip in
der Philosophie Giordano Brunos (Würzburg, 1997), Kant-
Reader: Probleme und Perspektiven der Kant’schen Philoso-
phie (ed. with H. Ingensiep, and H. Baranzke, Würzburg,
2004), and Mimesis oder ästhetische Wahrheit. Philoso-
phisch-theologische Voraus setzungen und geistesgeschichtli-
cher Kontext der Entwicklung eines ästhetischen Wahrheits-
begriffs (Berlin, 2012).
Hufnagel_cover.indd 1 2013-04-24 12:20:17
TURNING TRADITIONS
UPSIDE DOWN
Rethinking Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal i
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 5
6 Turning Traditions Upside Down
tional restrictions—which are still binding Kepler, e.g.—and, in doing so,
anticipates the cosmological reforms of the seventeenth-century as repre-
sented by Huygens or Newton.
Wolfgang Neuser presents an alternative interpretation of Bruno’s the-
ory of matter. Against the backdrop of the controversial medieval debates
about atomism concerning the attributes or qualities of atoms, their cor-
puscular or essential substantiality, and the appreciation of them as dis-
tinct particles, Bruno develops an understanding of matter that merges the
Aristotelian concept of substance with atomistic ideas and the Neo-Pla -
tonic concept of matter, according to which matter is filled with spirit.
Bruno differentiates three manifestations of the metaphysical monad, i.e.,
the undivided, infinite unum that systematically underlies everything.
These manifestations are the constituents of matter: spiritus, based on the
neo-Platonic concept of a spiritual virtue inherent in all matter; spatium,
or the structural explication of the indivisible, un-extended point, which
emerges in a process of self-generation; and atomus, the smallest indivisi-
ble or the physical minimum. Spirit, space, and atom are the structural
modes of the expansion of infinite unity. Based on this conceptualisation
of matter, Neuser characterizes Bruno as a Renaissance philosopher who,
at the end of the post-traditional stage in history, anticipates the subject-
based foundation of knowledge, representative for thinkers from the Mo -
dern Age like Descartes, Spinoza or Leibniz.
Enrico Giannetto’s chapter emphasizes no less than the astonishing fact
that Giordano Bruno—notwithstanding the significant differences in theo-
retical premises—presents a theory of relativity of time and motion three
hundred years before Poincaré and Einstein. While his non-mechanistic
conception of nature was an obstacle in recognizing Bruno as a serious sci-
entist, according to Giannetto, Bruno’s importance within the history of
theoretical physics is irrefutable. He argues that the relativity of time is
one consequence of Bruno’s concept of cosmic infinity, also entailing the
relativity of the localisation of planets or stars and of their motion, rota-
tion and orbits within a uniform space. Rejecting the Aristotelian assump-
tion of a primum mobile, Bruno argues for the plurality of incommensu-
rable times due to the infinity of uniform motions within the universe.
Turning the Aristotelian doctrine upside down, Bruno regards (relative)
motion as the measure of time.
Arcangelo Rossi, comparing the cosmological theories of Copernicus,
Bruno, and Galilei, attests a striking correspondence between the Nolan
and the Galilean doctrines. Like Giannetto, Rossi aims at restoring Bru -
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 6
7
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 9
the right place to commemorate the philosopher from Nola. For Grün bein,
the statue is an iconographic alarm signal, visualizing a rhetoric of fire, the
language of alchemy and metamorphoses that characterizes Bruno’s think-
ing. Finally, Grünbein brings thinkers and poets together in a virtual con-
versation across time and space: Bruno, Nietzsche, Scho pen hau er, and
Czesław Miłosz.
Anything but virtual were the exchanges we—philosophers, historians, and
literary scholars—had about Giordano Bruno in the congenial and inspiring
atmosphere of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin,
and our discussions and debates sowed many seeds. We are proud to see
how they have matured and grown now into this volume. At the end of this
project, we want to express our gratitude towards several individuals and
institutions for their unflinching support, financial as well as moral and in -
tel lectual: Jürgen Renn and Yehuda Elkana, the Max Planck Insti tute for the
History of Science, the Central European Uni versity, the Cent ral European
University Press, and, last but definitely not least, to Andreas Edel.
Finally, we would like to thank the students who assisted us in the com-
pletion of this volume with untiring effort, Fanny Neumann, Jussuf Spie gel,
Charlotte Wetzel and, especially, Oliver Schumacher, who also translated
Durs Grünbein’s contribution.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
Born in 1548 near the town of Nola in the Kingdom of Naples, Gior -
dano Bruno is known today as an exceptional, yet ambivalent figure with-
in the history of ideas. As a great scholar, celebrated for his comprehen-
sive erudition, famous for his emphatic defence of philosophical inquiry
against religious doctrine and his rigid attacks against reputed authorities,
he caused an intellectual stir wherever he went. Sometimes his interventi -
ons were received with great éclat; more often, however, they created aca -
de mic scandal. Bruno impressed the French King Henri III who made him
one of his “lecteurs royaux”; three years later, he had to leave Paris in
tumultuous circumstances after a disputation had grown out of control. In
the meantime, Bruno had upset the intellectual scene in Elizabethan
England with his six Italian dialogues. Moving between different frontiers,
confessional beliefs, philosophical schools, academic parties and institu-
tional interests, Bruno—who did not mince matters—came under attack
from many sides.
Bruno argued relentlessly for a replacement of the philosophical koiné
of his time, the Scholastic Aristotelian philosophy that presented a view of
man and cosmos, which Bruno had been dissatisfied with since his time in a
Dominican convent in Naples. For his project of philosophical reform, Bruno
draws on a large variety of sources: on Platonic, pre-Socratic, Py tha gorean,
and Hermetic ideas, on thinkers such as Plotinus, Averroes, Nicholas of
Cusa, Raimundus Lullus and Ficino. He builds on the metho do logy, flour-
ishing during the Renaissance, of mnemotechnics. And he uses all these
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 1
2 Turning Traditions Upside Down
7
no’s position within the history of natural sciences. He presents him as a
serious contemporary of Galilei. Although there are deep philosophical
and methodological differences, both agree that Copernicus’s heliocentric
system is not just a mathematical hypothesis but an explanation of the real
cosmic structures. Whereas Bruno’s convictions are based on the study of
ancient philosophy, the basis of Galilei’s theories are innovative instru-
mental practices that allow him to make precise observations and calcula-
tions. Both share an anti-Aristotelian impetus, abolishing the distinction
between supralunar and sublunar physics: Both attest there is but one
homogeneous world, governed by one natural law. Finally, they analogo -
usly interpret the Scriptures regarding natural knowledge. In fact, Bru no
literally anticipates the allegoric interpretation of the Scriptures later
adopted by Galilei: The aim of the Bible and of religious dogma in gener-
al is social and moral discipline and not the description of natural truth.
The third section of this volume, Forms of Non-Conformity: Bruno’s Works
as Literary Texts, shifts the focus from Bruno’s ideas to his texts. Bruno
was a versatile, highly experimental writer, well-experienced in many gen-
res and styles and familiar with numerous, especially heterodox and eccen-
tric traditions. His disposition for polemics, satire and paradox, his lin-
guistic inventiveness and scorn of literary decorum make his texts
colourful and compelling reading. The essays presented here take a look at
the literary aspect of Bruno’s philosophy and examine how the form of
Bruno’s texts determines their meaning.
Nuccio Ordine takes on the tripartite structure of Bruno’s comedy
Candelaio, and asks why not only one, as in other plays, but three stock
characters of Renaissance comedy are ridiculed here. He argues that the
answer is to be found in the theory of the comic as set forth in Plato’s
Philebus. Here, Socrates identifies three basic situations of ridicule—situ-
ations perfectly embodied by the three protagonists of Candelaio. Thus,
Ordine sheds light on the way Bruno works when writing his texts. Stres -
sing the gnoseological function of the comic in Bruno’s text, he finally indi-
cates some central elements of Bruno’s philosophy.
Sergius Kodera also examines Candelaio in his essay. He uncovers a
line of political thought, an implicit commentary on important historical,
political affairs, running throughout the whole comedy, leading up to
Machiavelli. Although Bruno never even mentions the name of the philo -
sopher-politician from Florence, Kodera detects the subterranean pre sence
of Machiavelli in strategically important passages of Candelaio. He shows
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 7
8 Turning Traditions Upside Down
how Bruno adapts the Machiavellian notions of vicissitudo and occasione
and parallels Bruno’s re-evaluation of the sense of touch with Machi a -
velli’s ideas: For both authors, it is hands-on knowledge rather than de -
tached vision that is conducive to true insight and acquisition of power.
Whereas Bruno makes it clear that this re-evaluation involves heavy meta-
physical implications, Machiavelli and Bruno do share common ground
again in their vehement criticism of Christianity as harmful to the commu-
nity.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
Sic […] mons peramoene Cicadae,
[…] blandiri tua lumina sancta recordor.
Ut fueras hedera, et ramis redimitus olivae
Et corni, et lauri, et myrthi, rorisque marini,
Castanea circumcinctus, quercu, populo, ulmo,
Coniugio uviferae vitis felicibus, utque
Ruvida porrexit tenerae manui manus uvam,
Indice distencto dixti mihi: respice ad austrum,
Respice germanum mihi ab illa parte Vesevum.
Germanus meus, ille tibi quoque vult bene: credis?
Si te illuc mittam, nunc dic: vis ire? manebis
Cumque illo posthac. Vitreis tunc versus ocellis,
Prospectans formam informem, relegensque figuram
Furvi dumtaxat cumuli: dorso ille repando,
Dixi, ille incurvus dentato tergore, coelum
Contiguum findens? toto discrimine mundi
Hinc abstans, fumo turpisque umbrante, nec ullis
Muneribus pollens, nec enim sunt poma nec uvae,
Nec dulces illi ficus: caret arbore et hortis,
Obscurus, tetricus, tristis, trux, vilis, avarus.
At tu subridens: tamen est germanus amansque
Ille mei, atque tibi bene vult. Vise ergo, nec eius
Blanditias contemne, scio nihil ille molestum
Quod tibi sit, faciet, nolensque manere redibis.
Ergo ubi adesse datum est illic, propiusque tueri
Vesuvium Baccho celebrem, multoque superbum
Arbusto, ubertim e ramis pendentibus uvis,
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 13
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
This volume brings together some of the most eminent researchers to have worked on Giordano
Bruno and his epoch. In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of his
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary thinking upside down,
and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as the theoretical consequences of his thought,
the contributions all start from an exemplary passage drawn from Bruno’s great range of work
or from texts close to his person and oeuvre. Presenting and elucidating pivotal points of the
philosophia nolana, the essays both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy
and provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual reflections that
will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s works. They reconstruct his deconstruction
and rearrangement of philosophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They explore the topics
and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and point out the variance of his reception
up to the present, both inside and outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and
continuing fascination of Bruno’s work.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 7
8 Turning Traditions Upside Down
how Bruno adapts the Machiavellian notions of vicissitudo and occasione
and parallels Bruno’s re-evaluation of the sense of touch with Machi a -
velli’s ideas: For both authors, it is hands-on knowledge rather than de -
tached vision that is conducive to true insight and acquisition of power.
Whereas Bruno makes it clear that this re-evaluation involves heavy meta-
physical implications, Machiavelli and Bruno do share common ground
again in their vehement criticism of Christianity as harmful to the commu-
nity.
This section concludes with Henning Hufnagel’s analysis of Bruno’s
shortest dialogue, Cabala del cavallo pegaseo. Hufnagel focuses on the dia-
logue’s twisted structure. Cabala is one of the most disputed of Bruno’s
texts and scholars have made many attempts to fix a positive theoretical
me aning in the dialogue. Hufnagel shows that this is a hopeless fight
because Bruno blends the dialogue with forms of paradoxical epideixis:
Bruno piles up paradoxes until all claims negate and cancel each other.
Hufnagel proposes Cabala should instead be read as a satire of knowledge.
The transmission of alleged knowledge between the interlocutors collapses
continually and Bruno lays bare their modes of argumentation. If anything
is to be learned from Cabala, it is how the literary form of the dialogue can
acquire the value of an argument. Thus, Cabala can be understood as a
reflection on the dialectical possibilities of the dialogue as a genre.
In the fourth section in this volume, Reflections of an Intellectual Burning:
Bruno’s Reception and Literary Afterlife, the horizon widens both themat-
ically and temporally. This section looks at some of the traces Bruno’s life
and work left in other philosophical, or even theological contexts, presents
aspects of his sometimes curious literary afterlife—which extends to
Bertolt Brecht and beyond—and tries to come to terms with the truly last-
ing fascination exerted by the man from Nola.
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann explores the possibilities of picturing me -
ta physics by analysing a copper engraving in Heinrich Khunrath’s Amphi -
theatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. In this image, the Kabbalistic foundation of
all being, both the divine and the creatural, is symbolically depicted. For
Bruno, the externalization of the first cause—which is in itself unknow-
able, because it only reveals itself in its expression—is, at the same time,
the beginning of all spatiality. This idea corresponds materially to the
imaging of the first cause, as it is represented in the Leipzig theosopher
Khunrath’s great work Amphitheatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. He goes beyond
Bruno, however, when he problematizes the question of the symbolism of
the divine externalizations.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 8
Bibliography
Primary sources
Bruno, G. “De immenso et innumerabilibus.” In Jordani Bruni Nolani Opera latine con-
scripta. Vol. I, 2. Ed. F. Fiorentino. Naples: Morano, 1884. Reprint, Stuttgart/Bad
Cannstatt: From mann, 1962.
———. Dialoghi filosofici italiani. Ed. M. Ciliberto. Milan: Mondadori, 2000.
Secondary sources
Gatti, H. Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science. Ithaca NY: Cornell University
Press, 1999.
Michel, P.-H. The Cosmology of Giordano Bruno. Paris: Herrmann, 1973.
Rowland, I. D. “Athanasius Kircher, Giordano Bruno, and the Panspermia of the
Infinite Universe.” In Athanasius Kircher, the Last Man who Knew Everything. Ed.
P. Findlen, 191–206. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Siebert, H. Die große kosmologische Kontroverse: Rekonstruktionsversuche anhand des
Itinerarium exstaticum von Athanasius Kircher SJ (1602–1680). Stuttgart: Franz
Steiner Verlag, 2006.
Sigurdsson, H. Melting the Earth: the History of Ideas on Volcanic Eruptions. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1999.
Notes
1 “Thus the Earth receives life-giving seeds from the Suns’s orb / And by its motion
tempers the seething heat of its rays,” Bruno, Opera latine conscripta I, 2, 283.
2 Raymundi Lullii Opera ea quae ad inventam ab ipso artem universalem, Scientiarum
Artiumque Omnium Brevi compendio, firmaque memoria apprehendendarum, locu-
pletissimaque vel oratione ex tempore pertractandarum pertinent. Ut et in eandem
quorundam interpretum scripti commentarii, Argentorati, sumptibus Haeredum
Lazari Zetzneri, 1617. The book is mostly devoted, then, to Ramon Llull, himself a
suspect author for the drafters of the Index. Bruno’s works appear from pp. 662–786,
and are followed by those of another suspect author, Henricus Cornelius Agrippa, a
Protestant from Strasbourg, 1617, who would suffer greatly in the Thirty Years’ War
(starting in 1618); the city was annexed to Catholic France in 1681.
3 The classroom spaces of the Collegio Romano have belonged to Rome’s first public
high school, the Liceo Ennio Quirino Visconti, since the unification of Italy in 1870.
Valla, Lorenzo 67
Vanini, Lucilio 247n
Vasoli, Cesare 36
Védrine, Hélène 107, 117n, 118n, 136,
145, 147n
265
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 265
Verlaine, Paul 239
Visconti, Ennio Quirino 233n
Viviani, Vittorio 162, 175n
Volkert, Klaus Thomas 32n
Vossler, Karl 243, 247n
Wackenfels, Johann Matthäus Wackher
von 94
Warburg, Aby 9, 36, 57, 58, 61n, 238, 242,
243, 244, 246n, 247n
Wechel, Johann 59n
Weinberg, Bernard 156n
Wersinger, Anne-Gabrielle 156n
Westman, Robert S. 104n
Wicke, Erhard 33n
Wildgen, Wolfgang 117n
Wolfart, Erasmus 200, 201, 216n
Wyclif(fe), John 110, 247n
Yates, Frances A. 9, 36, 136, 147n, 195n,
196n, 238, 244, 247n
Zeller, Eduard 87n
Zetzner, Lazarus 233n
Index Nominum266
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 266
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
The tragedy of Bruno’s life and thought may be seen as a radical sym-
bol of the human struggle for knowledge, rising to the challenge of free-
dom of thought at the risk of losing ground. It is upside down, therefore,
that Alexander Polzin’s sculpture shows Bruno.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 2
3
In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of Bruno’s
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary
thinking upside down, and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as
the theoretical consequences of his thought, the contributions of this vol-
ume all start from a selected text, an exemplary passage drawn from Bru -
no’s great range of work or from texts close to his person and œuvre. Pre -
senting and elucidating pivotal points of the philosophia nolana, the essays
both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy and
provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual
reflections that will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s
works. They reconstruct Bruno’s deconstruction and rearrangement of
phi lo sophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They
ex plore the topics and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and
point out the variance of his reception up to the present, both inside and
outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and continuing
fascination of Bruno’s work.
The results of the contributor’s investigations are presented in four sec-
tions, according to four main fields of research interest. The first section
entitled Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary: Bruno’s Methods and Thin -
king, examines Bruno’s methodological procedures. The essays show how
the Nolan undermined traditional positions, by a subtle reflexion on epis-
temological principles, logical structures, or metaphysical presuppositions,
to secure evidence for his philosophy of the infinite and its inherent con-
sequences which revolutionized the fields of metaphysics and epistemolo-
gy, physics, cosmology and anthropology. Bruno’s method of appropriat-
ing and concatenating older philosophical concepts appears to be both a
method of critical revision as well as systematic transformation.
Central European University Press
An imprint of the
Central European University Limited Liability Company
Nádor utca 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000
Fax: +36-1-327-3183
E-mail: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: www.ceupress.com
224 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019, USA
Tel: +1-212-547-6932
Fax: +1-646-557-2416
E-mail: martin.greenwald@opensocietyfoundations.org
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, without the permission
of the Publisher.
ISBN 978-615-5053-63-4
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Turning traditions upside down : rethinking Giordano Bruno's enlightenment /
[edited by] Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte.
pages cm
Proceedings of a colloquium held in 2008 at Max Planck Institute for the
History of Science.
Includes index.
ISBN 978-6155053634 (hardbound)
1. Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600. I. Hufnagel, Henning S. II. Eusterschulte, Anne.
B783.Z7T87 2012
195--dc23
2012007959
Printed in Hungary by
Akaprint Kft.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal iv
Table of Contents
YEHUDA ELKANA and JÜRGEN RENN
Preface vii
HENNING HUFNAGEL and ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Introduction 1
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of Default Positions 13
ANGELIKA BÖNKER-VALLON
The Measurement of the Immeasurable.
Divine Mind and Mathematical Structures in Giordano Bruno’s
De triplici minimo et mensura 19
MICHELE CILIBERTO
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…” 35
ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Platonic Caverns and Epicurean Worlds 63
PART 2
Experience and Vision of a New Cosmic Order:
Giordano Bruno’s Natural Philosophy
MIGUEL ÁNGEL GRANADA
De immenso et innumerabilibus, I, 3 and the Concept of Planetary
Systems in the Infinite Universe. A Commentary 91
WOLFGANG NEUSER
Atom, Matter, and Monade 107
ENRICO RENATO ANTONIO GIANNETTO
Giordano Bruno and the Relativity of Time 121
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal v
ARCANGELO ROSSI
Giordano Bruno and the New Order of Nature between
Copernicus and Galilei 131
PART 3
Forms of Non-Conformity:
Bruno’s Works as Literary Texts
NUCCIO ORDINE
The Comic and Philosophy: Plato’s Philebus and
Bruno’s Candle-bearer 151
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
In his essay “…per speculum et in aenigmate…,” Michele Ciliberto dis-
plays how “thinking through images” is the central point in Bruno’s nova
filosofia. It is the topic not only of his meditations on the ars memoriae, but
is continuously discussed both in his Italian as well as in his later Latin
works. For Bruno, the use of images is a condition preceding every act of
thinking. This leads him to a new conceptualisation of the process of cog-
nition: Images or mental phantastic figures are like an interface between
mind and nature, between the logical, abstract operations and the innu-
merable appearances of the visible world. At the same time, the inex-
haustible potency of fantasy to produce images makes us aware of the idea
of infinity. In this context, the dialectic between fantasy and intellect,
abstract synthesis and creative analysis is, as Ciliberto points out, vitally
important: it shows the way of man’s approximation to the eternal truth,
an infinite itinerarium, i.e., a metaphysical movement of man who by
descending into himself tries to know the One, a way which allows him to
touch the divine cause indirectly “through the mirror and in enigma.”
Following this, Anne Eusterschulte attempts to delineate Bruno’s assi -
milation of heterogeneous elements of ancient philosophy and shows how,
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 4
5
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…”
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 49
50 Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary
mind and, although they emerge for the first time at this stage of his
research, they are constantly considered right up to his last works, for
example in some remarkable pages of the De immenso.
To investigate the reasons for the recurrence of these issues from both
linguistic and conceptual viewpoints means to face the problem of the
dynamics of Bruno’s ‘mind,’ a task that cannot be accomplished here. In
the context of our line of reasoning, however, some elements can be point-
ed out: First, these subjects, also outlined in De umbris, appear in a text
that, for a long time, has been counted amongst the mnemotechnical works
and implicitly dismissed due to an obsolete idea of Renaissance culture
and philosophy. However, we must drop this misinterpretation if we want
to understand Bruno’s theories, in this particular text and in general.
This text, in fact, has strong philosophical caliber and is perhaps one of
the most relevant in Bruno’s œuvre. Yet, due to its composite structure, it
also has the important merit of taking us straight into Bruno’s ‘workshop,’
allowing us to both understand the manner in which his texts must be deci-
phered in general and to define (or confirm) at least four specific points.
These include the articulated theoretical basis of his ars, which tackles a
number of gnosiologial, ontological, and ethical issues, evenly introducing
them into the frame of the nova filosofia; the fact that ethico-political and
religious issues are already established in his mnemotechnical works and
destined to find a fuller development in the Spaccio (where the contro -
versy against Puritans becomes central as much as vehement); the possi-
bility, as a consequence, of dating the genesis of Bruno’s first conception
of the Spaccio to the last period of his stay in Paris, though in the frame of
a polemic that, in the Sigillus, is aimed against Protestants as well as
against monastic orders; and, last but not least, the text allows us to figure
out Bruno’s modus operandi.
Yet, one needs not exaggerate the relation between the Sigillus and the
Spaccio. The persistency of these topics, even if in a short time span,
attests to the continuity of some main themes and also to the incessant
revision to which Bruno subjected his works.
Visible: 0% - 100%
Here is a table summarizing additional key themes and contributions from Turning Traditions Upside Down that were not directly addressed in earlier questions:
| Section | Contents | Contributions | Challenges | Argument | Quotation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruno’s Vision of Natural Philosophy | Explores Bruno’s integration of Copernican cosmology, metaphysical unity, and Hermetic ideas into a new natural order. | Presents a cohesive framework for infinite plurality and dynamic interaction across the cosmos. | Reconciling metaphysical concepts with empirical science and addressing Bruno’s divergence from dominant religious cosmology. | Bruno’s natural philosophy redefines humanity’s role within an infinite, centerless universe governed by natural laws rather than divine hierarchy. | "The universe has no boundaries, reflecting the divine unity within all matter and spirit." | Discussions on natural philosophy in De immenso et innumerabilibus and essays on Bruno’s cosmology . |
| Relativity of Time and Motion | Analyzes Bruno’s anticipation of relativity concepts, proposing that time and motion are relative within an infinite and uniform universe. | Suggests Bruno as a precursor to modern physics, challenging Aristotelian mechanics with concepts of infinite and relational motion. | Critics may dismiss Bruno’s theories as philosophical rather than scientific, lacking empirical verification. | Bruno’s cosmology disrupts classical mechanics by positing that time and space are relative to the observer’s position within infinite, interconnected systems. | "Time and motion are relational, tied to the interplay of infinite celestial systems." | Analysis by Enrico Giannetto on relativity in Bruno’s works . |
| Philosophical Comedy | Examines Bruno’s use of satire and paradox in works like Candelaio to critique societal norms and philosophical complacency. | Highlights the role of humor as a philosophical tool for disrupting established beliefs and engaging broader audiences. | Balancing satirical and serious tones to avoid reducing philosophical insights to mere comedic entertainment. | Bruno employs comedy to unveil the absurdities of traditional thought, positioning humor as a means of intellectual liberation and critical reflection. | "Comedy serves to reveal deeper truths about the human condition and societal dogma." | Essays by Nuccio Ordine and Sergius Kodera on Candelaio . |
| Epistemology of the Infinite | Investigates Bruno’s methods for understanding infinite concepts through the interplay of imagination, mnemonics, and philosophical reasoning. | Provides insights into how Bruno challenges epistemic defaults, encouraging flexible thinking to accommodate the infinite. | Bridging abstract metaphysical concepts with tangible cognitive processes; addressing limitations of Renaissance epistemology. | Bruno’s epistemology redefines cognition as an iterative process of aligning human thought with the infinite structures of the cosmos. | "Imagination is the interface between mind and the infinite, shaping the intellect’s journey toward universal truths." | Paul Richard Blum and Michele Ciliberto’s discussions on epistemology . |
| Literary Afterlife | Explores Bruno’s influence on modern philosophy, literature, and art, including representations in sculpture and poetic interpretation. | Showcases Bruno’s enduring relevance as a symbol of intellectual freedom, inspiring generations of thinkers, writers, and artists. | Avoiding overly idealized portrayals that overshadow the historical Bruno’s complex philosophical contributions. | Bruno’s legacy extends beyond his cosmology and philosophy, reflecting a timeless struggle for intellectual liberty and human dignity. | "Bruno’s intellectual fire continues to ignite the imagination of modernity, a beacon for free thought across disciplines." | Reflections on Alexander Polzin’s sculpture and Durs Grünbein’s poetic tribute . |
This table offers a comprehensive look at some of the book’s most significant discussions and contributions. Let me know if you'd like further details on any of these themes!
make a table of epistemological concepts
make a table of Bruno's works
Here’s a table of Giordano Bruno's major works, including their themes and significance:
| Work | Year | Key Themes | Significance | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De umbris idearum | 1582 | Mnemonics, epistemology, and the interplay of imagination and metaphysics. | Marks Bruno’s first major exploration of mnemotechnics, linking memory to universal structures. | Introduces symbolic imagery and sigils as cognitive tools for understanding metaphysical concepts. |
| Cena de le Ceneri (Ash Wednesday Supper) | 1584 | Defense of Copernican cosmology, critique of Aristotelian and Ptolemaic astronomy, infinite universe. | Establishes Bruno as a champion of Copernicanism and a radical proponent of the infinite, centerless universe. | Combines philosophical argument with satire, challenging traditional academic and religious authorities. |
| De la causa, principio et uno | 1584 | Unity of matter and spirit, metaphysical monism, rejection of Aristotelian substance theory. | Articulates Bruno’s metaphysics, emphasizing the unity and immanence of all existence. | Introduces the concept of the infinite One as the foundation of reality. |
| De l’infinito, universo e mondi | 1584 | Infinite universe, plurality of worlds, rejection of geocentrism and fixed hierarchies. | Expands on the Copernican model, presenting a cosmos without center or periphery, populated by innumerable worlds. | Pioneers the idea of a universe governed by universal principles, not divine hierarchy. |
| Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante | 1584 | Ethical reform, critique of superstition, and reinterpretation of Hermetic symbolism. | Combines moral philosophy with cosmology, proposing a new ethical order based on the principles of the infinite universe. | Employs allegory and satire to dismantle religious and societal norms. |
| Cabala del cavallo pegaseo | 1585 | Satire of religious orthodoxy, exploration of human folly, and critique of intellectual dogma. | Uses humor and paradox to challenge the rigidity of institutionalized thought. | A humorous and biting critique of philosophical and theological complacency. |
| De triplici minimo et mensura | 1586 | Metaphysics, mathematics, and the concept of the minimum as the fundamental unit of reality. | Blends mathematical and metaphysical ideas, contributing to early modern debates about atomism and the nature of matter. | Develops the notion of the minimum as both physical and metaphysical. |
| De monade, numero et figura | 1591 | Ontology of the monad, symbolic systems, and numerical relationships. | Expands on the metaphysical principles introduced in De triplici minimo, emphasizing the unity of mathematical and philosophical thought. | Explores the relationship between numbers, figures, and universal truths. |
| De immenso et innumerabilibus | 1591 | Cosmology, metaphysics, infinite universe, critique of Aristotelian and Scholastic traditions. | A comprehensive articulation of Bruno’s cosmological theories, incorporating Hermetic and Neo-Platonic ideas. | Emphasizes the infinite nature of reality and its implications for human understanding. |
| Explicatio triginta sigillorum | 1583 | Mnemonics, metaphysics, and Hermetic renewal (renovatio). | Demonstrates Bruno’s effort to reform human knowledge using symbolic and mnemonic systems. | Highlights the connection between memory systems and philosophical insight. |
| Candelaio | 1582 | Satirical comedy critiquing human folly, religious hypocrisy, and intellectual pretensions. | Bruno’s only play, blending humor and sharp critique of societal norms and intellectual stagnation. | Uses dramatic structure to address philosophical and ethical questions. |
This table outlines the key themes, significance, and notable features of Bruno’s works, highlighting their contributions to philosophy, cosmology, and satire. Let me know if you’d like further elaboration on any specific work!
make a table of Bruno scholars mentioned or writing in the bookghvb]\ ]
unknownmsearch(["Bruno scholars mentioned", "contributors to Turning Traditions Upside Down", "scholars writing about Bruno in the book"])
[Web browsing]
historians in order to discuss the figure of Giordano Bruno as a ‘thinker
through images.’51 Some fragments of his research are still extant, being
“entrusted to a notebook with a black cover, bearing the title of Giordano
Bruno” and consisting of “45 pages of notes and observations written
between the autumn of 1928 and June 1929, during his stay in Rome with
Gertrude Bing.”52 This material, now made available to scholars,53 is of
extreme interest. However, shortly after writing this letter and embarking
on his project, Warburg passed away and could not accomplish this plan.
Even so, his intuition about ‘thinking through images,’ is still at the center
of the research on Bruno’s philosophy and still represents a necessary
touchstone, on a conceptual as well as historiographical level. The interest
in Bruno’s mnemonics, as attested to by the recent publication of his
mnemotechnical works, arises from a belief similar to that of Warburg.
Better still, it aspires to be the confirmation of the intuition that crossed
Warburg’s mind almost a century ago.
Bibliography
Primary sources
Bruno, G. Corpus iconographicum. Le incisioni nelle opere a stampa. Ed. M. Gabriele.
Milan: Adelphi, 2001.
———. Dialoghi filosofici italiani. Ed. M. Ciliberto. Milan: Mondadori, 2000.
———. Dialoghi italiani. Eds. G. Gentile and G. Aquilecchia. Florence: Sansoni, 1958.
———. Jordani Bruni Nolani Opera latine conscripta, 3 vols., 8 parts. Eds. F. Fiorentino,
F. Tocco, H. Vitelli, V. Imbriani and C. M. Tallarigo. Naples/Florence: Morano/Le
Monnier, 1879–91. Reprint Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: From mann, 1961–62.
———. Opere latine. Ed. C. Monti. Turin: Utet, 1980.
———. Opere mnemotecniche, vol. 2. Eds. M. Ciliberto, M. Matteoli, R. Sturlese and
N. Tirinnanzi. Milan: Adelphi, 2009.
Calvino, I. Lezioni americane. Milan: Garzanti, 1988.
Cusano, N. Opere filosofiche. Ed. G. Federici-Vescovini. Turin: Utet, 1972.
Warburg, A. “Giordano Bruno.” Eds. M. Ghelardi and G. Targia. Cassirer Studies 1
(2008): 29–58.
Warburg, A. and E. Cassirer. Il mondo di ieri. Lettere. Ed. M. Ghelardi. Turin: Aragno,
2003.
Secondary sources
Ciliberto, M. “Bruno e l’Apocalisse,” in L’occhio di Atteone. Nuovi studi su Giordano
Bruno, 63–94. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2002.
———. Giordano Bruno. Il teatro della vita. Milan: Mondadori, 2007.
———. Umbra profunda. Studi su Giordano Bruno. Rome: Edizioni di storia e lette -
ratura, 1999.
Valla, Lorenzo 67
Vanini, Lucilio 247n
Vasoli, Cesare 36
Védrine, Hélène 107, 117n, 118n, 136,
145, 147n
265
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 265
Verlaine, Paul 239
Visconti, Ennio Quirino 233n
Viviani, Vittorio 162, 175n
Volkert, Klaus Thomas 32n
Vossler, Karl 243, 247n
Wackenfels, Johann Matthäus Wackher
von 94
Warburg, Aby 9, 36, 57, 58, 61n, 238, 242,
243, 244, 246n, 247n
Wechel, Johann 59n
Weinberg, Bernard 156n
Wersinger, Anne-Gabrielle 156n
Westman, Robert S. 104n
Wicke, Erhard 33n
Wildgen, Wolfgang 117n
Wolfart, Erasmus 200, 201, 216n
Wyclif(fe), John 110, 247n
Yates, Frances A. 9, 36, 136, 147n, 195n,
196n, 238, 244, 247n
Zeller, Eduard 87n
Zetzner, Lazarus 233n
Index Nominum266
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 266
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
Index Nominum266
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 266
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
This volume brings together some of the most eminent researchers to have worked on Giordano
Bruno and his epoch. In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of his
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary thinking upside down,
and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as the theoretical consequences of his thought,
the contributions all start from an exemplary passage drawn from Bruno’s great range of work
or from texts close to his person and oeuvre. Presenting and elucidating pivotal points of the
philosophia nolana, the essays both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy
and provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual reflections that
will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s works. They reconstruct his deconstruction
and rearrangement of philosophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They explore the topics
and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and point out the variance of his reception
up to the present, both inside and outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and
continuing fascination of Bruno’s work.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
This volume brings together some of the most eminent researchers to have worked on Giordano
Bruno and his epoch. In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of his
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary thinking upside down,
and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as the theoretical consequences of his thought,
the contributions all start from an exemplary passage drawn from Bruno’s great range of work
or from texts close to his person and oeuvre. Presenting and elucidating pivotal points of the
philosophia nolana, the essays both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy
and provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual reflections that
will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s works. They reconstruct his deconstruction
and rearrangement of philosophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They explore the topics
and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and point out the variance of his reception
up to the present, both inside and outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and
continuing fascination of Bruno’s work.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of Bruno’s
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary
thinking upside down, and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as
the theoretical consequences of his thought, the contributions of this vol-
ume all start from a selected text, an exemplary passage drawn from Bru -
no’s great range of work or from texts close to his person and œuvre. Pre -
senting and elucidating pivotal points of the philosophia nolana, the essays
both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy and
provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual
reflections that will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s
works. They reconstruct Bruno’s deconstruction and rearrangement of
phi lo sophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They
ex plore the topics and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and
point out the variance of his reception up to the present, both inside and
outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and continuing
fascination of Bruno’s work.
The results of the contributor’s investigations are presented in four sec-
tions, according to four main fields of research interest. The first section
entitled Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary: Bruno’s Methods and Thin -
king, examines Bruno’s methodological procedures. The essays show how
the Nolan undermined traditional positions, by a subtle reflexion on epis-
temological principles, logical structures, or metaphysical presuppositions,
to secure evidence for his philosophy of the infinite and its inherent con-
sequences which revolutionized the fields of metaphysics and epistemolo-
gy, physics, cosmology and anthropology. Bruno’s method of appropriat-
ing and concatenating older philosophical concepts appears to be both a
method of critical revision as well as systematic transformation.
Paul Richard Blum opens the volume with an epistemological reflection
on default values, in reference to a passage from Bruno’s Latin poem De
immenso. While default settings are constitutive instruments of every cog-
nitive process—they function as a sort of practical, temporary prejudice—
Blum accentuates Bruno’s request for an epistemic meta-operation. In his
poem, Bruno reminds us to be conscious of the tentativeness of mental de -
fault values in the same way as children are aware of the fact that changing
sights of one and the same object are related to their point of view. If the
in tellect fails to realize the infinity of the universe, it is not the fault of the
visual sense, but of the unconsidered reliance on vision as an epistemic de -
fault value. Bruno advocates a change in the standard principles of thought.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
About the Editors
Henning Hufnagel is junior fellow at the Freiburg
Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS) and member
of the research group “Deutsche Ausgabe der Schriften
Giordano Brunos.” Selected publications: Ein Stück von
jeder Wissenschaft. Gattungshybridisierung, Argumenta -
tion und Erkenntnis in Giordano Brunos italienischen
Dialogen (Stuttgart, 2009), “‘Pour abréger votre chemin
à l’un et à l’autre’. Plötzlichkeit in Marivaux’ La surprise
de l’amour.” Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 60,
4 (2010): 389–404, “‘Nun, Schifflein! sieh’ dich vor!’—
Meerfahrt mit Nietzsche. Zu einem Motiv der Fröhlichen
Wissenschaft.” Nietzsche-Studien 37 (2008): 143–59.
Anne Eusterschulte is professor of philosophy at Freie
Universität Berlin. Selected publications: Analogia entis
seu mentis. Analogie als erkenntnistheoretisches Prinzip in
der Philosophie Giordano Brunos (Würzburg, 1997), Kant-
Reader: Probleme und Perspektiven der Kant’schen Philoso-
phie (ed. with H. Ingensiep, and H. Baranzke, Würzburg,
2004), and Mimesis oder ästhetische Wahrheit. Philoso-
phisch-theologische Voraus setzungen und geistesgeschichtli-
cher Kontext der Entwicklung eines ästhetischen Wahrheits-
begriffs (Berlin, 2012).
Hufnagel_cover.indd 1 2013-04-24 12:20:17
TURNING TRADITIONS
UPSIDE DOWN
Rethinking Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal i
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal vii
viii Turning Traditions Upside Down
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Kircher’s Itinerarium Extaticum accepted most of these premises in one
form or another; the research by his contemporary Evangelista Torricelli
had gone far toward proving the existence of an atmosphere, and he him-
self was no less convinced than his angel Cosmiel that Earth and heaven
were made of the same basic stuff. Schott bolsters Kircher’s contentions
about the Moon’s atmosphere by naming some of the modern natural
philosophers who agree with him:
The question, then, is: Does the Moon have an atmosphere, just as
our Earth has one of its own? For many more recent scholars, after
the discovery of the telescope, have identified a layer surrounding
[the Moon] of air or a denser sort of aether, like Kepler, Maestlin,
Galileo, Longomontanus, Giordano Bruno, David Fabricius, Anto nio
Maria de Rheita, Mario Bettini, Langrenius, Wendelin, Johannes
Bapt ista Cysatus, and Scheiner; our Author [that is, Kircher] cited
these last two in his Preface, and agreed with them.15
Bruno, then, is set comfortably, if somewhat anachronistically, among a
group of modern astronomers (he died before the invention of the tele-
scope). He may not appear explicitly as the Giordano Bruno who pro-
claimed the infinite size of the universe, but no one who read the heretic’s
opinions on the lunar atmosphere could do so without also taking in his
larger ideas, ideas relevant, moreover, to the Iter Extaticum’s later discus-
sions of the size of the universe and panspermia rerum. In effect, both
Schott, by mentioning Bruno explicitly, and his Jesuit readers, by forbear-
A Catholic reader of Giordano Bruno in Counter-Reformation Rome
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 229
230 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
ing to object to Bruno as an indexed author, had decided, tacitly but firmly,
to prefer the free development of philosophical inquiry to the preservation
of doctrinal purity, and this was the same decision that Kircher himself had
made in writing his Itinerarium Extaticum in the first place.
Central European University Press
An imprint of the
Central European University Limited Liability Company
Nádor utca 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000
Fax: +36-1-327-3183
E-mail: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: www.ceupress.com
224 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019, USA
Tel: +1-212-547-6932
Fax: +1-646-557-2416
E-mail: martin.greenwald@opensocietyfoundations.org
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, without the permission
of the Publisher.
ISBN 978-615-5053-63-4
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Turning traditions upside down : rethinking Giordano Bruno's enlightenment /
[edited by] Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte.
pages cm
Proceedings of a colloquium held in 2008 at Max Planck Institute for the
History of Science.
Includes index.
ISBN 978-6155053634 (hardbound)
1. Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600. I. Hufnagel, Henning S. II. Eusterschulte, Anne.
B783.Z7T87 2012
195--dc23
2012007959
Printed in Hungary by
Akaprint Kft.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal iv
Table of Contents
YEHUDA ELKANA and JÜRGEN RENN
Preface vii
HENNING HUFNAGEL and ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Introduction 1
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of Default Positions 13
ANGELIKA BÖNKER-VALLON
The Measurement of the Immeasurable.
Divine Mind and Mathematical Structures in Giordano Bruno’s
De triplici minimo et mensura 19
MICHELE CILIBERTO
“…per speculum et in aenigmate…” 35
ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Platonic Caverns and Epicurean Worlds 63
PART 2
Experience and Vision of a New Cosmic Order:
Giordano Bruno’s Natural Philosophy
MIGUEL ÁNGEL GRANADA
De immenso et innumerabilibus, I, 3 and the Concept of Planetary
Systems in the Infinite Universe. A Commentary 91
WOLFGANG NEUSER
Atom, Matter, and Monade 107
ENRICO RENATO ANTONIO GIANNETTO
Giordano Bruno and the Relativity of Time 121
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal v
ARCANGELO ROSSI
Giordano Bruno and the New Order of Nature between
Copernicus and Galilei 131
PART 3
Forms of Non-Conformity:
Bruno’s Works as Literary Texts
NUCCIO ORDINE
The Comic and Philosophy: Plato’s Philebus and
Bruno’s Candle-bearer 151
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
Born in 1548 near the town of Nola in the Kingdom of Naples, Gior -
dano Bruno is known today as an exceptional, yet ambivalent figure with-
in the history of ideas. As a great scholar, celebrated for his comprehen-
sive erudition, famous for his emphatic defence of philosophical inquiry
against religious doctrine and his rigid attacks against reputed authorities,
he caused an intellectual stir wherever he went. Sometimes his interventi -
ons were received with great éclat; more often, however, they created aca -
de mic scandal. Bruno impressed the French King Henri III who made him
one of his “lecteurs royaux”; three years later, he had to leave Paris in
tumultuous circumstances after a disputation had grown out of control. In
the meantime, Bruno had upset the intellectual scene in Elizabethan
England with his six Italian dialogues. Moving between different frontiers,
confessional beliefs, philosophical schools, academic parties and institu-
tional interests, Bruno—who did not mince matters—came under attack
from many sides.
Bruno argued relentlessly for a replacement of the philosophical koiné
of his time, the Scholastic Aristotelian philosophy that presented a view of
man and cosmos, which Bruno had been dissatisfied with since his time in a
Dominican convent in Naples. For his project of philosophical reform, Bruno
draws on a large variety of sources: on Platonic, pre-Socratic, Py tha gorean,
and Hermetic ideas, on thinkers such as Plotinus, Averroes, Nicholas of
Cusa, Raimundus Lullus and Ficino. He builds on the metho do logy, flour-
ishing during the Renaissance, of mnemotechnics. And he uses all these
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 1
2 Turning Traditions Upside Down
9
As for Bruno’s reception after his death—and after the ban on his writ-
ings—this is the focus of Ingrid Rowland’s essay. Rowland displays how
Giordano Bruno, surprisingly, continued to exert his influence in Catholic
Europe, even in the midst of the Counter-Reformation: half a century
after his death, his name appears in the work of the German-born Jesuit
Athanasius Kircher, clearly unafraid to cite Giordano Bruno openly in his
own publications. Rowland traces Bruno’s subliminal presence in the writ-
ings of this polymath and polygraph, ranging from the structure of the uni-
verse to its small-scale composition and even to mnemonics. How did
Kircher get hold of Bruno’s books? Rowland explains that Jesuits had bet-
ter access than most of their peers to controversial books, e.g., through a
system of internal censorship. Drawing on documents from the archive of
the Jesuit Order in Rome, Rowland is able to show that Kircher and his
fellow Jesuits enjoyed remarkable freedom in philosophical inquiry as the
censors aimed less at doctrinal purity and were more concerned that their
writings could superare mediocritatem, were “exceeding the average.”
François Quiviger tracks aspects of Bruno’s afterlife in the twentieth-
century from Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London. He starts with a musi-
cal drama about Bruno’s life by a certain Charles Clair, a work that ironi-
cally brought about the excommunication of the author. Quiviger
examines the image of Bruno in fiction and points out that in novels and
dramas, Bruno often is presented as a Christ-like figure. He then follows
the material history of Clair’s book, acquired by Aby Warburg in 1929. In
the last year before his death, Warburg was particularly interested in
Bruno; he hoped that in Bruno’s works he might find a link between pagan
image-based thought and modern symbol-based thought. The material on
Bruno that Warburg had collected but had not been able to exploit,
eventu ally sustained the seminal research of Frances A. Yates at the
Warburg Institute in London, although her perspective on the Nolan dif-
fered completely from Warburg’s.
The last section of the book, Visibility of the Invisible: About the Sculpture
Giordano Bruno by Alexander Polzin [2008], is dedicated to the statue of
Giordano Bruno that was recently erected in Berlin. Besides a description
of the statue and its pendants at Nola and Budapest made by the sculptor,
Alexander Polzin, himself, the author Durs Grünbein gives a poet’s inter-
pretation of the statue at the moment of its unveiling at Potsdamer Platz. He
construes the heretic as an emblematic figure of a young, independent
Europe and asks himself why Berlin—a city which Bruno, this great tra -
veller, has never been to—and, specifically, an underground station could be
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 9
Hufnagel_cover.indd 1 2013-04-24 12:20:17
TURNING TRADITIONS
UPSIDE DOWN
Rethinking Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal i
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal ii
TURNING TRADITIONS
UPSIDE DOWN
Rethinking Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
HENNING HUFNAGEL
and
ANNE EUSTERSCHULTE
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal iii
© 2013 by Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Published in 2013 by
Central European University Press
An imprint of the
Central European University Limited Liability Company
Nádor utca 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000
Fax: +36-1-327-3183
E-mail: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: www.ceupress.com
224 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019, USA
Tel: +1-212-547-6932
Fax: +1-646-557-2416
E-mail: martin.greenwald@opensocietyfoundations.org
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, without the permission
of the Publisher.
ISBN 978-615-5053-63-4
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Turning traditions upside down : rethinking Giordano Bruno's enlightenment /
[edited by] Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte.
pages cm
Proceedings of a colloquium held in 2008 at Max Planck Institute for the
History of Science.
Includes index.
ISBN 978-6155053634 (hardbound)
1. Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600. I. Hufnagel, Henning S. II. Eusterschulte, Anne.
B783.Z7T87 2012
195--dc23
2012007959
Printed in Hungary by
Akaprint Kft.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal iv
Table of Contents
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 7
8 Turning Traditions Upside Down
how Bruno adapts the Machiavellian notions of vicissitudo and occasione
and parallels Bruno’s re-evaluation of the sense of touch with Machi a -
velli’s ideas: For both authors, it is hands-on knowledge rather than de -
tached vision that is conducive to true insight and acquisition of power.
Whereas Bruno makes it clear that this re-evaluation involves heavy meta-
physical implications, Machiavelli and Bruno do share common ground
again in their vehement criticism of Christianity as harmful to the commu-
nity.
This section concludes with Henning Hufnagel’s analysis of Bruno’s
shortest dialogue, Cabala del cavallo pegaseo. Hufnagel focuses on the dia-
logue’s twisted structure. Cabala is one of the most disputed of Bruno’s
texts and scholars have made many attempts to fix a positive theoretical
me aning in the dialogue. Hufnagel shows that this is a hopeless fight
because Bruno blends the dialogue with forms of paradoxical epideixis:
Bruno piles up paradoxes until all claims negate and cancel each other.
Hufnagel proposes Cabala should instead be read as a satire of knowledge.
The transmission of alleged knowledge between the interlocutors collapses
continually and Bruno lays bare their modes of argumentation. If anything
is to be learned from Cabala, it is how the literary form of the dialogue can
acquire the value of an argument. Thus, Cabala can be understood as a
reflection on the dialectical possibilities of the dialogue as a genre.
In the fourth section in this volume, Reflections of an Intellectual Burning:
Bruno’s Reception and Literary Afterlife, the horizon widens both themat-
ically and temporally. This section looks at some of the traces Bruno’s life
and work left in other philosophical, or even theological contexts, presents
aspects of his sometimes curious literary afterlife—which extends to
Bertolt Brecht and beyond—and tries to come to terms with the truly last-
ing fascination exerted by the man from Nola.
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann explores the possibilities of picturing me -
ta physics by analysing a copper engraving in Heinrich Khunrath’s Amphi -
theatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. In this image, the Kabbalistic foundation of
all being, both the divine and the creatural, is symbolically depicted. For
Bruno, the externalization of the first cause—which is in itself unknow-
able, because it only reveals itself in its expression—is, at the same time,
the beginning of all spatiality. This idea corresponds materially to the
imaging of the first cause, as it is represented in the Leipzig theosopher
Khunrath’s great work Amphitheatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. He goes beyond
Bruno, however, when he problematizes the question of the symbolism of
the divine externalizations.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 8
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 5
6 Turning Traditions Upside Down
tional restrictions—which are still binding Kepler, e.g.—and, in doing so,
anticipates the cosmological reforms of the seventeenth-century as repre-
sented by Huygens or Newton.
Wolfgang Neuser presents an alternative interpretation of Bruno’s the-
ory of matter. Against the backdrop of the controversial medieval debates
about atomism concerning the attributes or qualities of atoms, their cor-
puscular or essential substantiality, and the appreciation of them as dis-
tinct particles, Bruno develops an understanding of matter that merges the
Aristotelian concept of substance with atomistic ideas and the Neo-Pla -
tonic concept of matter, according to which matter is filled with spirit.
Bruno differentiates three manifestations of the metaphysical monad, i.e.,
the undivided, infinite unum that systematically underlies everything.
These manifestations are the constituents of matter: spiritus, based on the
neo-Platonic concept of a spiritual virtue inherent in all matter; spatium,
or the structural explication of the indivisible, un-extended point, which
emerges in a process of self-generation; and atomus, the smallest indivisi-
ble or the physical minimum. Spirit, space, and atom are the structural
modes of the expansion of infinite unity. Based on this conceptualisation
of matter, Neuser characterizes Bruno as a Renaissance philosopher who,
at the end of the post-traditional stage in history, anticipates the subject-
based foundation of knowledge, representative for thinkers from the Mo -
dern Age like Descartes, Spinoza or Leibniz.
Enrico Giannetto’s chapter emphasizes no less than the astonishing fact
that Giordano Bruno—notwithstanding the significant differences in theo-
retical premises—presents a theory of relativity of time and motion three
hundred years before Poincaré and Einstein. While his non-mechanistic
conception of nature was an obstacle in recognizing Bruno as a serious sci-
entist, according to Giannetto, Bruno’s importance within the history of
theoretical physics is irrefutable. He argues that the relativity of time is
one consequence of Bruno’s concept of cosmic infinity, also entailing the
relativity of the localisation of planets or stars and of their motion, rota-
tion and orbits within a uniform space. Rejecting the Aristotelian assump-
tion of a primum mobile, Bruno argues for the plurality of incommensu-
rable times due to the infinity of uniform motions within the universe.
Turning the Aristotelian doctrine upside down, Bruno regards (relative)
motion as the measure of time.
Arcangelo Rossi, comparing the cosmological theories of Copernicus,
Bruno, and Galilei, attests a striking correspondence between the Nolan
and the Galilean doctrines. Like Giannetto, Rossi aims at restoring Bru -
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 6
7
nology: Cassirer Studies 1 (2008): 16–58.
———. Tagebuch der Kulturwissenschaftlichen Bibliothek Warburg. Ed. K. Michels
and C. Schoell-Glass. Berlin: Akademie, 2001.
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 245
246 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
Secondary sources
Berggren, L. L’ombra dei grandi: monumenti e politica monumentale a Roma (1870–
1895). Rome: Artemide, 1996.
Canone, E. Bruno Redivivus: momenti della fortuna di Giordano Bruno nel XIX secolo.
Pisa: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 1998.
Forbes, F. D. A. Life of Pius X. London: Washbourne, 1918.
Gatti, H. “Frances Yates’s Hermetic Renaissance in the Documents held in the
Warburg Institute Archive.” Aries 2, no. 2 (2002): 193–210.
———. “The State of Giordano Bruno Studies at the End of the Four-Hundredth
Centenary of the Philosopher’s Death.” Renaissance Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2001): 252–61.
Mann, N. “Denkenergetische Inversion: Aby Warburg and Giordano Bruno.”
Publications of the English Goethe Society 72 (2003): 25–37.
Salvestrini, V. Bibliografia delle opere di Giordano Bruno. 2nd (posthumous) edition,
by L. Firpo. Florence: Sansoni, 1958.
Spampanato, V. Documenti della vita di Giordano Bruno. Florence: Leo S. Olschki,
1933.
Notes
1 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), 83–87. Full text available at:
http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/mnemosyne/Bruno/pdf/1802234462.pdf
2 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1914), unpaginated dedication; Clair,
Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), xiii. Bordighera is a luxury resort on
the Ligurian Coast.
3 Bayle, Dictionnaire, I, 680. See Eugenio Canone’s introduction to Canone, Bruno
Redivivus, xx–xxi.
4 Bartholmèss, Jordano Bruno, II, 3; see also McIntyre, Giordano Bruno, 52.
5 Plumptre, Giordano Bruno; Schefer, Göttliche Komödie in Rom.
6 Scotino, Giordano Bruno: scena drammatica; Holitscher, Giordano Bruno: histo -
risches Drama in 5 Abteilungen; Levi, Gior dano Bruno, o Le lotte del pensiero;
Borngräber, Giordano Bruno: das neue Jahrhundert; Fola Igúrbide, Giordano
Bruno; Kolbenheyer, Heroische Leidenschaften.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 9
the right place to commemorate the philosopher from Nola. For Grün bein,
the statue is an iconographic alarm signal, visualizing a rhetoric of fire, the
language of alchemy and metamorphoses that characterizes Bruno’s think-
ing. Finally, Grünbein brings thinkers and poets together in a virtual con-
versation across time and space: Bruno, Nietzsche, Scho pen hau er, and
Czesław Miłosz.
Anything but virtual were the exchanges we—philosophers, historians, and
literary scholars—had about Giordano Bruno in the congenial and inspiring
atmosphere of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin,
and our discussions and debates sowed many seeds. We are proud to see
how they have matured and grown now into this volume. At the end of this
project, we want to express our gratitude towards several individuals and
institutions for their unflinching support, financial as well as moral and in -
tel lectual: Jürgen Renn and Yehuda Elkana, the Max Planck Insti tute for the
History of Science, the Central European Uni versity, the Cent ral European
University Press, and, last but definitely not least, to Andreas Edel.
Finally, we would like to thank the students who assisted us in the com-
pletion of this volume with untiring effort, Fanny Neumann, Jussuf Spie gel,
Charlotte Wetzel and, especially, Oliver Schumacher, who also translated
Durs Grünbein’s contribution.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
by L. Firpo. Florence: Sansoni, 1958.
Spampanato, V. Documenti della vita di Giordano Bruno. Florence: Leo S. Olschki,
1933.
Notes
1 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), 83–87. Full text available at:
http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/mnemosyne/Bruno/pdf/1802234462.pdf
2 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1914), unpaginated dedication; Clair,
Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), xiii. Bordighera is a luxury resort on
the Ligurian Coast.
3 Bayle, Dictionnaire, I, 680. See Eugenio Canone’s introduction to Canone, Bruno
Redivivus, xx–xxi.
4 Bartholmèss, Jordano Bruno, II, 3; see also McIntyre, Giordano Bruno, 52.
5 Plumptre, Giordano Bruno; Schefer, Göttliche Komödie in Rom.
6 Scotino, Giordano Bruno: scena drammatica; Holitscher, Giordano Bruno: histo -
risches Drama in 5 Abteilungen; Levi, Gior dano Bruno, o Le lotte del pensiero;
Borngräber, Giordano Bruno: das neue Jahrhundert; Fola Igúrbide, Giordano
Bruno; Kolbenheyer, Heroische Leidenschaften.
7 Bartolucci, Giordano Bruno.
8 See, e.g., Levi, Giordano Bruno, 15, 124; Fola Igúrbide, José, Giordano Bruno, 38,
87 (Agony in the Garden). Best is undoubtedly Scotino’s observation: “Da molti il
Bruno è salutato il Cristo della Scienza…” in Scotino, Giordano Bruno, 16.
9 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), 73.
10 Fola Igúrbide, Giordano Bruno, 50sq.
11 Levi, Giordano Bruno, 74, 93.
12 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1914), Warburg copy: “Dopo questa
letterà il Comm. Visconte Clair di nazionalità francese fù excommunicato («excom-
municazione maggiore»).”
13 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925) xi.
14 Spampanato Documenti, 202.
15 Berggren, L’ombra dei grandi, 123.
16 Balan, Di Giordano Bruno, 14.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 246
247
17 Dialoghetti familiari tra un imbianchino e riquadratore di stanze fiorentino ed un sig-
nore romano sopra la vera storia di Giordano Bruno, 10–12, 22.
A Catholic reader of Giordano Bruno in Counter-Reformation Rome
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 229
230 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
ing to object to Bruno as an indexed author, had decided, tacitly but firmly,
to prefer the free development of philosophical inquiry to the preservation
of doctrinal purity, and this was the same decision that Kircher himself had
made in writing his Itinerarium Extaticum in the first place.
As the vicissitudes of the Iter Extaticum demonstrate, the Society of
Jesus had once stood at the forefront of research in natural philosophy; in
the days when Christoph Clavius and Giordano Bruno were neighbors in
Rome (as they were in 1576) and in the early days of Galileo’s career. By
the middle of the seven teenth century, however, the Fathers were begin-
ning to feel the pressures of its religious restrictions. One way to alleviate
these pressures was to ignore them, as happened to some extent at every
stage in the publication of Kircher’s book on cosmology; Dunel’s mention
of collusion was not out of place. Kircher was also known to publish his
work without ever incorporating the Revisores’ suggestions, further proof
that his status within his order was privileged indeed.16
Fiction offered another means of escape from the pressures of hewing
to an orthodox line of thought; by putting his ideas about cosmology into
a dream vision, Kircher could argue, along with his Revisores, that the
visions had nothing to do with factual truth. This was simply a more
extreme version of reasoning ex hypothesi, as Galileo had been urged to do
with Copernicus: discussing a controversial idea by insisting that it bore no
relationship to reality.
Kircher also resorted on many occasions to self-contradiction, making a
doc trinally acceptable point in order to argue its opposite in subsequent dis -
cussion. This tactic, interestingly, met with particular scorn from the Revi -
sores, one of the proverbial lapses, like his bragging and his failure to in cor -
porate suggestions, for which the Society’s illustrious author was pre dic tably
accused in every censura—his own complaints about the jealousy of his
peers seem as well-founded as their own complaints about his boasting.17
Visible: 0% - 100%
Here is a table summarizing the Bruno scholars who contributed to Turning Traditions Upside Down or were prominently discussed in the volume:
| Scholar | Focus/Contribution | Notable Ideas | Relevance to Bruno Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henning Hufnagel | Co-editor of the volume; contributed to discussions on Bruno's use of paradox and the satirical aspects of his works, particularly Cabala del cavallo pegaseo. | Explores the genre-blending and paradoxical argumentation in Bruno’s dialogue, emphasizing its role as a critique of traditional epistemology. | Highlights the literary and philosophical strategies in Bruno’s works, framing them as a satire of conventional forms of knowledge. |
| Anne Eusterschulte | Co-editor; examined Neo-Platonic and Epicurean elements in Bruno’s cosmological works. | Analyzes how Bruno synthesizes competing traditions to develop his cosmology of infinity and unity. | Provides a nuanced understanding of Bruno’s metaphysical and cosmological synthesis. |
| Paul Richard Blum | Discusses epistemological reflections in Bruno’s works, especially the Frankfurt Trilogy. | Identifies Bruno’s approach to challenging mental "default positions," urging an epistemic meta-operation to embrace the infinite. | Frames Bruno as a thinker who constantly reconfigures the epistemological foundations of his time. |
| Michele Ciliberto | Investigates Bruno’s use of allegory and metaphor, particularly in his philosophical dialogues. | Explores the tension between Bruno’s poetic style and his systematic philosophical aims. | Demonstrates the importance of literary style in communicating Bruno’s philosophical innovations. |
| Enrico R. A. Giannetto | Explores Bruno’s anticipation of the relativity of time and motion, linking his ideas to modern physics. | Argues that Bruno’s concept of cosmic infinity implies a relativity of time and space, challenging Aristotelian and Newtonian assumptions. | Positions Bruno as a precursor to modern scientific thought, particularly in theoretical physics. |
| Miguel A. Granada | Examines Bruno’s cosmological works, particularly De immenso et innumerabilibus, focusing on planetary systems in an infinite universe. | Emphasizes Bruno’s departure from both geocentrism and heliocentrism, proposing a centerless cosmos. | Reframes Bruno’s contributions to Copernican debates as more radical and transformative. |
| Nuccio Ordine | Analyzes the role of comedy and satire in Bruno’s philosophical works, especially Candelaio. | Explores how Bruno uses humor as a tool for philosophical critique and intellectual liberation. | Highlights the performative and critical dimensions of Bruno’s writings, underscoring their subversive intent. |
| Ingrid Rowland | Focuses on Bruno’s reception during the Counter-Reformation and his influence on later Jesuit thinkers like Athanasius Kircher. | Tracks Bruno’s intellectual legacy despite censorship, showing how his ideas persisted covertly in Jesuit scholarship. | Illuminates the complex afterlife of Bruno’s works within Catholic Europe, even during periods of strict orthodoxy. |
| Arcangelo Rossi | Compares Bruno’s cosmological ideas with those of Copernicus and Galileo, emphasizing their shared break from Aristotelian cosmology. | Highlights the continuities and divergences between Bruno’s infinite universe and the emerging modern scientific paradigm. | Situates Bruno within the broader intellectual movement of early modern science. |
| Alexander Polzin | Created the Giordano Bruno sculpture, discussed in the book’s final chapter. | Uses Bruno’s philosophical themes as inspiration for visual art, depicting him as a vulnerable yet transformative figure. | Demonstrates the enduring cultural and artistic resonance of Bruno’s legacy. |
This table provides an overview of key scholars and their contributions, emphasizing their diverse approaches to Bruno’s works and intellectual legacy. Let me know if you'd like additional elaboration on specific figures or themes!
make a table of any other scholars mentioned
unknownmsearch(["other scholars mentioned in Turning Traditions Upside Down", "secondary scholars discussed", "references to Bruno scholars"])
[Web browsing]
historians in order to discuss the figure of Giordano Bruno as a ‘thinker
through images.’51 Some fragments of his research are still extant, being
“entrusted to a notebook with a black cover, bearing the title of Giordano
Bruno” and consisting of “45 pages of notes and observations written
between the autumn of 1928 and June 1929, during his stay in Rome with
Gertrude Bing.”52 This material, now made available to scholars,53 is of
extreme interest. However, shortly after writing this letter and embarking
on his project, Warburg passed away and could not accomplish this plan.
Even so, his intuition about ‘thinking through images,’ is still at the center
of the research on Bruno’s philosophy and still represents a necessary
touchstone, on a conceptual as well as historiographical level. The interest
in Bruno’s mnemonics, as attested to by the recent publication of his
mnemotechnical works, arises from a belief similar to that of Warburg.
Better still, it aspires to be the confirmation of the intuition that crossed
Warburg’s mind almost a century ago.
Bibliography
Primary sources
Bruno, G. Corpus iconographicum. Le incisioni nelle opere a stampa. Ed. M. Gabriele.
Milan: Adelphi, 2001.
———. Dialoghi filosofici italiani. Ed. M. Ciliberto. Milan: Mondadori, 2000.
———. Dialoghi italiani. Eds. G. Gentile and G. Aquilecchia. Florence: Sansoni, 1958.
———. Jordani Bruni Nolani Opera latine conscripta, 3 vols., 8 parts. Eds. F. Fiorentino,
F. Tocco, H. Vitelli, V. Imbriani and C. M. Tallarigo. Naples/Florence: Morano/Le
Monnier, 1879–91. Reprint Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: From mann, 1961–62.
———. Opere latine. Ed. C. Monti. Turin: Utet, 1980.
———. Opere mnemotecniche, vol. 2. Eds. M. Ciliberto, M. Matteoli, R. Sturlese and
N. Tirinnanzi. Milan: Adelphi, 2009.
Calvino, I. Lezioni americane. Milan: Garzanti, 1988.
Cusano, N. Opere filosofiche. Ed. G. Federici-Vescovini. Turin: Utet, 1972.
Warburg, A. “Giordano Bruno.” Eds. M. Ghelardi and G. Targia. Cassirer Studies 1
(2008): 29–58.
Warburg, A. and E. Cassirer. Il mondo di ieri. Lettere. Ed. M. Ghelardi. Turin: Aragno,
2003.
Secondary sources
Ciliberto, M. “Bruno e l’Apocalisse,” in L’occhio di Atteone. Nuovi studi su Giordano
Bruno, 63–94. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2002.
———. Giordano Bruno. Il teatro della vita. Milan: Mondadori, 2007.
———. Umbra profunda. Studi su Giordano Bruno. Rome: Edizioni di storia e lette -
ratura, 1999.
Valla, Lorenzo 67
Vanini, Lucilio 247n
Vasoli, Cesare 36
Védrine, Hélène 107, 117n, 118n, 136,
145, 147n
265
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 265
Verlaine, Paul 239
Visconti, Ennio Quirino 233n
Viviani, Vittorio 162, 175n
Volkert, Klaus Thomas 32n
Vossler, Karl 243, 247n
Wackenfels, Johann Matthäus Wackher
von 94
Warburg, Aby 9, 36, 57, 58, 61n, 238, 242,
243, 244, 246n, 247n
Wechel, Johann 59n
Weinberg, Bernard 156n
Wersinger, Anne-Gabrielle 156n
Westman, Robert S. 104n
Wicke, Erhard 33n
Wildgen, Wolfgang 117n
Wolfart, Erasmus 200, 201, 216n
Wyclif(fe), John 110, 247n
Yates, Frances A. 9, 36, 136, 147n, 195n,
196n, 238, 244, 247n
Zeller, Eduard 87n
Zetzner, Lazarus 233n
Index Nominum266
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 266
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of Bruno’s
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary
thinking upside down, and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as
the theoretical consequences of his thought, the contributions of this vol-
ume all start from a selected text, an exemplary passage drawn from Bru -
no’s great range of work or from texts close to his person and œuvre. Pre -
senting and elucidating pivotal points of the philosophia nolana, the essays
both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy and
provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual
reflections that will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s
works. They reconstruct Bruno’s deconstruction and rearrangement of
phi lo sophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They
ex plore the topics and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and
point out the variance of his reception up to the present, both inside and
outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and continuing
fascination of Bruno’s work.
The results of the contributor’s investigations are presented in four sec-
tions, according to four main fields of research interest. The first section
entitled Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary: Bruno’s Methods and Thin -
king, examines Bruno’s methodological procedures. The essays show how
the Nolan undermined traditional positions, by a subtle reflexion on epis-
temological principles, logical structures, or metaphysical presuppositions,
to secure evidence for his philosophy of the infinite and its inherent con-
sequences which revolutionized the fields of metaphysics and epistemolo-
gy, physics, cosmology and anthropology. Bruno’s method of appropriat-
ing and concatenating older philosophical concepts appears to be both a
method of critical revision as well as systematic transformation.
Paul Richard Blum opens the volume with an epistemological reflection
on default values, in reference to a passage from Bruno’s Latin poem De
immenso. While default settings are constitutive instruments of every cog-
nitive process—they function as a sort of practical, temporary prejudice—
Blum accentuates Bruno’s request for an epistemic meta-operation. In his
poem, Bruno reminds us to be conscious of the tentativeness of mental de -
fault values in the same way as children are aware of the fact that changing
sights of one and the same object are related to their point of view. If the
in tellect fails to realize the infinity of the universe, it is not the fault of the
visual sense, but of the unconsidered reliance on vision as an epistemic de -
fault value. Bruno advocates a change in the standard principles of thought.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 7
8 Turning Traditions Upside Down
how Bruno adapts the Machiavellian notions of vicissitudo and occasione
and parallels Bruno’s re-evaluation of the sense of touch with Machi a -
velli’s ideas: For both authors, it is hands-on knowledge rather than de -
tached vision that is conducive to true insight and acquisition of power.
Whereas Bruno makes it clear that this re-evaluation involves heavy meta-
physical implications, Machiavelli and Bruno do share common ground
again in their vehement criticism of Christianity as harmful to the commu-
nity.
This section concludes with Henning Hufnagel’s analysis of Bruno’s
shortest dialogue, Cabala del cavallo pegaseo. Hufnagel focuses on the dia-
logue’s twisted structure. Cabala is one of the most disputed of Bruno’s
texts and scholars have made many attempts to fix a positive theoretical
me aning in the dialogue. Hufnagel shows that this is a hopeless fight
because Bruno blends the dialogue with forms of paradoxical epideixis:
Bruno piles up paradoxes until all claims negate and cancel each other.
Hufnagel proposes Cabala should instead be read as a satire of knowledge.
The transmission of alleged knowledge between the interlocutors collapses
continually and Bruno lays bare their modes of argumentation. If anything
is to be learned from Cabala, it is how the literary form of the dialogue can
acquire the value of an argument. Thus, Cabala can be understood as a
reflection on the dialectical possibilities of the dialogue as a genre.
In the fourth section in this volume, Reflections of an Intellectual Burning:
Bruno’s Reception and Literary Afterlife, the horizon widens both themat-
ically and temporally. This section looks at some of the traces Bruno’s life
and work left in other philosophical, or even theological contexts, presents
aspects of his sometimes curious literary afterlife—which extends to
Bertolt Brecht and beyond—and tries to come to terms with the truly last-
ing fascination exerted by the man from Nola.
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann explores the possibilities of picturing me -
ta physics by analysing a copper engraving in Heinrich Khunrath’s Amphi -
theatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. In this image, the Kabbalistic foundation of
all being, both the divine and the creatural, is symbolically depicted. For
Bruno, the externalization of the first cause—which is in itself unknow-
able, because it only reveals itself in its expression—is, at the same time,
the beginning of all spatiality. This idea corresponds materially to the
imaging of the first cause, as it is represented in the Leipzig theosopher
Khunrath’s great work Amphitheatrum Sapientiae Aeternae. He goes beyond
Bruno, however, when he problematizes the question of the symbolism of
the divine externalizations.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 8
Bibliography
Primary sources
Bruno, G. “De immenso et innumerabilibus.” In Jordani Bruni Nolani Opera latine con-
scripta. Vol. I, 2. Ed. F. Fiorentino. Naples: Morano, 1884. Reprint, Stuttgart/Bad
Cannstatt: From mann, 1962.
———. Dialoghi filosofici italiani. Ed. M. Ciliberto. Milan: Mondadori, 2000.
Secondary sources
Gatti, H. Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science. Ithaca NY: Cornell University
Press, 1999.
Michel, P.-H. The Cosmology of Giordano Bruno. Paris: Herrmann, 1973.
Rowland, I. D. “Athanasius Kircher, Giordano Bruno, and the Panspermia of the
Infinite Universe.” In Athanasius Kircher, the Last Man who Knew Everything. Ed.
P. Findlen, 191–206. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Siebert, H. Die große kosmologische Kontroverse: Rekonstruktionsversuche anhand des
Itinerarium exstaticum von Athanasius Kircher SJ (1602–1680). Stuttgart: Franz
Steiner Verlag, 2006.
Sigurdsson, H. Melting the Earth: the History of Ideas on Volcanic Eruptions. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1999.
Notes
1 “Thus the Earth receives life-giving seeds from the Suns’s orb / And by its motion
tempers the seething heat of its rays,” Bruno, Opera latine conscripta I, 2, 283.
2 Raymundi Lullii Opera ea quae ad inventam ab ipso artem universalem, Scientiarum
Artiumque Omnium Brevi compendio, firmaque memoria apprehendendarum, locu-
pletissimaque vel oratione ex tempore pertractandarum pertinent. Ut et in eandem
quorundam interpretum scripti commentarii, Argentorati, sumptibus Haeredum
Lazari Zetzneri, 1617. The book is mostly devoted, then, to Ramon Llull, himself a
suspect author for the drafters of the Index. Bruno’s works appear from pp. 662–786,
and are followed by those of another suspect author, Henricus Cornelius Agrippa, a
Protestant from Strasbourg, 1617, who would suffer greatly in the Thirty Years’ War
(starting in 1618); the city was annexed to Catholic France in 1681.
3 The classroom spaces of the Collegio Romano have belonged to Rome’s first public
high school, the Liceo Ennio Quirino Visconti, since the unification of Italy in 1870.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 5
6 Turning Traditions Upside Down
tional restrictions—which are still binding Kepler, e.g.—and, in doing so,
anticipates the cosmological reforms of the seventeenth-century as repre-
sented by Huygens or Newton.
Wolfgang Neuser presents an alternative interpretation of Bruno’s the-
ory of matter. Against the backdrop of the controversial medieval debates
about atomism concerning the attributes or qualities of atoms, their cor-
puscular or essential substantiality, and the appreciation of them as dis-
tinct particles, Bruno develops an understanding of matter that merges the
Aristotelian concept of substance with atomistic ideas and the Neo-Pla -
tonic concept of matter, according to which matter is filled with spirit.
Bruno differentiates three manifestations of the metaphysical monad, i.e.,
the undivided, infinite unum that systematically underlies everything.
These manifestations are the constituents of matter: spiritus, based on the
neo-Platonic concept of a spiritual virtue inherent in all matter; spatium,
or the structural explication of the indivisible, un-extended point, which
emerges in a process of self-generation; and atomus, the smallest indivisi-
ble or the physical minimum. Spirit, space, and atom are the structural
modes of the expansion of infinite unity. Based on this conceptualisation
of matter, Neuser characterizes Bruno as a Renaissance philosopher who,
at the end of the post-traditional stage in history, anticipates the subject-
based foundation of knowledge, representative for thinkers from the Mo -
dern Age like Descartes, Spinoza or Leibniz.
Enrico Giannetto’s chapter emphasizes no less than the astonishing fact
that Giordano Bruno—notwithstanding the significant differences in theo-
retical premises—presents a theory of relativity of time and motion three
hundred years before Poincaré and Einstein. While his non-mechanistic
conception of nature was an obstacle in recognizing Bruno as a serious sci-
entist, according to Giannetto, Bruno’s importance within the history of
theoretical physics is irrefutable. He argues that the relativity of time is
one consequence of Bruno’s concept of cosmic infinity, also entailing the
relativity of the localisation of planets or stars and of their motion, rota-
tion and orbits within a uniform space. Rejecting the Aristotelian assump-
tion of a primum mobile, Bruno argues for the plurality of incommensu-
rable times due to the infinity of uniform motions within the universe.
Turning the Aristotelian doctrine upside down, Bruno regards (relative)
motion as the measure of time.
Arcangelo Rossi, comparing the cosmological theories of Copernicus,
Bruno, and Galilei, attests a striking correspondence between the Nolan
and the Galilean doctrines. Like Giannetto, Rossi aims at restoring Bru -
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 6
7
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal vii
viii Turning Traditions Upside Down
mankind. This leads us to the reflection and the reception of Bruno’s intel-
lectual fire. Bruno has been received in literature and art as well as in pub-
lic spaces in a way that has been as versatile as the philosopher himself.
The sculpture created by Berlin artist Alexander Polzin, entitled Giordano
Bruno, is the subject of the final chapter of this volume. This artwork was
originally commissioned by the Central European University in Budapest
to celebrate George Soros’s seventieth birthday and copies were erected in
Budapest and Nola. On the occasion of our colloquium, the statue was also
inaugurated at Potsdamer Platz in the center of Berlin. The statue depicts
the vulnerable body of a philosopher who is turning the world upside-down
and attempting to dislodge the borders of the universe—a fitting symbol of
Bruno’s tragedy, a man who dared to reconsider the fundamentals of the
world as they had been passed down throughout the ages and who struggled
to find his place in Europe. Yet, after peregrination across the con tin ent, he
ended up cast as a heretic in all three Christian churches of the occident.
He is now honored in a place, at the centre of modern Eu rope, which also
once served as the stage for the tragedy of a world divided.
We would like to conclude by thanking all the authors who contributed
to this volume. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors, Henning
Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte, for their substantial contributions and
the great work they have achieved. We hope that this volume will help cre-
ate a better understanding of a philosopher whose thinking is more preva-
lent today than any of his contemporaries might have foreseen.
Index Nominum266
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 266
Rethinking
Giordano Bruno’s
Enlightenment
Edited by
Henning Hufnagel and Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Turning Traditions U
pside D
ow
n
Turning Traditions
Upside Down
Edited by
H
enning H
ufnagel
Anne Eusterschulte
Contributors
Paul Richard Blum
Angelika Bönker-Vallon
Michele Ciliberto
Anne Eusterschulte
Enrico R. A. Giannetto
Miguel A. Granada
Durs Grünbein
Henning Hufnagel
Sergius Kodera
Wolfgang Neuser
Nuccio Ordine
Alexander Polzin
François Quiviger
Arcangelo Rossi
Ingrid Rowland
Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann
Giordano Bruno: A non-conformist at the dawn of an epoch, a martyr of modernity, or just a
polemic controvert? Descriptions of this kind fall short of grasping the multifold character of “the
Nolan.” Deconstructing the relationship between God and the outside world gave distinction to
his life—and his refusal to recant when facing the stake somehow set him apart from the world.
Since then, the debate about the Nolan has been dominated by the interest in the comprehensive
oeuvre of the philosopher, and by attempts to make him a protagonist of the freedom of thought.
This volume brings together some of the most eminent researchers to have worked on Giordano
Bruno and his epoch. In order to bring into focus the horizon and the dimensions of his
transformation of traditions, to demonstrate how he turned contemporary thinking upside down,
and to delineate his persuasive strategies, as well as the theoretical consequences of his thought,
the contributions all start from an exemplary passage drawn from Bruno’s great range of work
or from texts close to his person and oeuvre. Presenting and elucidating pivotal points of the
philosophia nolana, the essays both invite readers to become acquainted with Bruno’s philosophy
and provide them with innovative dissections, interpretations and conceptual reflections that
will prepare the way for a revised reading of Bruno’s works. They reconstruct his deconstruction
and rearrangement of philosophical systems, his understanding of nature and the cosmos, his
methods of thinking and writing, his aesthetic and literary categories. They explore the topics
and modi operandi of the great Renaissance thinker and point out the variance of his reception
up to the present, both inside and outside academia, exhibiting the ever-changing relevance and
continuing fascination of Bruno’s work.
Central European University Press
Budapest – New York
Sales and information: ceupress@ceu.hu
Website: http://www.ceupress.com
0536347861559
ISBN 9786155053634
90000 >
C o v e r d e s i g n b y S e b a s t i a n S t a c h o w s k i
———. Opere latine. Ed. C. Monti. Turin: Utet, 1980.
———. Opere mnemotecniche, vol. 2. Eds. M. Ciliberto, M. Matteoli, R. Sturlese and
N. Tirinnanzi. Milan: Adelphi, 2009.
Calvino, I. Lezioni americane. Milan: Garzanti, 1988.
Cusano, N. Opere filosofiche. Ed. G. Federici-Vescovini. Turin: Utet, 1972.
Warburg, A. “Giordano Bruno.” Eds. M. Ghelardi and G. Targia. Cassirer Studies 1
(2008): 29–58.
Warburg, A. and E. Cassirer. Il mondo di ieri. Lettere. Ed. M. Ghelardi. Turin: Aragno,
2003.
Secondary sources
Ciliberto, M. “Bruno e l’Apocalisse,” in L’occhio di Atteone. Nuovi studi su Giordano
Bruno, 63–94. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2002.
———. Giordano Bruno. Il teatro della vita. Milan: Mondadori, 2007.
———. Umbra profunda. Studi su Giordano Bruno. Rome: Edizioni di storia e lette -
ratura, 1999.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 58
59
Ciliberto, M. and N. Tirinnanzi, eds. Il dialogo recitato. Per una nuova edizione del
Bruno volgare. Florence: Olschki, 2002.
Firpo, L. Il processo di Giordano Bruno. Ed. D. Quaglioni. Rome: Salerno, 1993.
Garin, E. “Le elezioni e il problema dell’astrologia,” in L’età nuova. Ricerche di storia
della cultura dal XII al XVI secolo, 423–47. Naples: Morano, 1969.
Mann, N. “Denkenergetische Inversion: Aby Warburg and Giordano Bruno.” English
Goethe Society 72 (2003): 25–37.
Rossi, P. Un altro presente. Saggi sulla storia della filosofia. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1999.
Tirinnanzi, N. “Temi apocalittici nel Sigillus sigillorum di Giordano Bruno.” Rinas ci -
mento 48 (2008): 335–49.
Tocco, F. Le opere latine di Giordano Bruno esposte e confrontate con le italiane.
Florence: Le Monnier, 1889.
Notes
* English translation by Olivia Catanorchi.
1 “Why, I say, do so few understand and apprehend the internal power? […] He, who
nology: Cassirer Studies 1 (2008): 16–58.
———. Tagebuch der Kulturwissenschaftlichen Bibliothek Warburg. Ed. K. Michels
and C. Schoell-Glass. Berlin: Akademie, 2001.
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 245
246 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
Secondary sources
Berggren, L. L’ombra dei grandi: monumenti e politica monumentale a Roma (1870–
1895). Rome: Artemide, 1996.
Canone, E. Bruno Redivivus: momenti della fortuna di Giordano Bruno nel XIX secolo.
Pisa: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 1998.
Forbes, F. D. A. Life of Pius X. London: Washbourne, 1918.
Gatti, H. “Frances Yates’s Hermetic Renaissance in the Documents held in the
Warburg Institute Archive.” Aries 2, no. 2 (2002): 193–210.
———. “The State of Giordano Bruno Studies at the End of the Four-Hundredth
Centenary of the Philosopher’s Death.” Renaissance Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2001): 252–61.
Mann, N. “Denkenergetische Inversion: Aby Warburg and Giordano Bruno.”
Publications of the English Goethe Society 72 (2003): 25–37.
Salvestrini, V. Bibliografia delle opere di Giordano Bruno. 2nd (posthumous) edition,
by L. Firpo. Florence: Sansoni, 1958.
Spampanato, V. Documenti della vita di Giordano Bruno. Florence: Leo S. Olschki,
1933.
Notes
1 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), 83–87. Full text available at:
http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/mnemosyne/Bruno/pdf/1802234462.pdf
2 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1914), unpaginated dedication; Clair,
Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), xiii. Bordighera is a luxury resort on
the Ligurian Coast.
3 Bayle, Dictionnaire, I, 680. See Eugenio Canone’s introduction to Canone, Bruno
Redivivus, xx–xxi.
4 Bartholmèss, Jordano Bruno, II, 3; see also McIntyre, Giordano Bruno, 52.
5 Plumptre, Giordano Bruno; Schefer, Göttliche Komödie in Rom.
6 Scotino, Giordano Bruno: scena drammatica; Holitscher, Giordano Bruno: histo -
risches Drama in 5 Abteilungen; Levi, Gior dano Bruno, o Le lotte del pensiero;
Borngräber, Giordano Bruno: das neue Jahrhundert; Fola Igúrbide, Giordano
Bruno; Kolbenheyer, Heroische Leidenschaften.
Berlin and Budapest, September 2012
Jürgen Renn
Director of the Max Planck Institute
for the History of Science, Berlin
Yehuda Elkana (1934–2012)
Former Rector and President of
Central European University, Budapest
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal viii
Introduction
Turning traditions upside down—this metaphor seems to be a good start-
ing point for rethinking Giordano Bruno’s philosophy and his provocative
aspirations in the world of letters. It certainly would have been to Bruno’s
liking; someone who, in his writings, often presented himself as a Mercu ri -
an, larger-than-life figure who has come to put things straight: the No lan,
enlightening his contemporaries about the misleading paths of traditional
doctrines and opening minds for the discovery of true philosophy.
Born in 1548 near the town of Nola in the Kingdom of Naples, Gior -
dano Bruno is known today as an exceptional, yet ambivalent figure with-
in the history of ideas. As a great scholar, celebrated for his comprehen-
sive erudition, famous for his emphatic defence of philosophical inquiry
against religious doctrine and his rigid attacks against reputed authorities,
he caused an intellectual stir wherever he went. Sometimes his interventi -
ons were received with great éclat; more often, however, they created aca -
de mic scandal. Bruno impressed the French King Henri III who made him
one of his “lecteurs royaux”; three years later, he had to leave Paris in
tumultuous circumstances after a disputation had grown out of control. In
the meantime, Bruno had upset the intellectual scene in Elizabethan
England with his six Italian dialogues. Moving between different frontiers,
confessional beliefs, philosophical schools, academic parties and institu-
tional interests, Bruno—who did not mince matters—came under attack
from many sides.
Bruno argued relentlessly for a replacement of the philosophical koiné
of his time, the Scholastic Aristotelian philosophy that presented a view of
man and cosmos, which Bruno had been dissatisfied with since his time in a
Dominican convent in Naples. For his project of philosophical reform, Bruno
draws on a large variety of sources: on Platonic, pre-Socratic, Py tha gorean,
and Hermetic ideas, on thinkers such as Plotinus, Averroes, Nicholas of
Cusa, Raimundus Lullus and Ficino. He builds on the metho do logy, flour-
ishing during the Renaissance, of mnemotechnics. And he uses all these
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 1
2 Turning Traditions Upside Down
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 3
4 Turning Traditions Upside Down
This mental operation leads to facing up to a radically altered view of the
world, resulting in the discovery of the philosophy of the infinite.
Covering Bruno’s so-called Frankfurt Trilogy, Angelika Bönker-Vallon
analyses Bruno’s intention to demonstrate the systematic interrelation
bet ween metaphysical, mathematical and physical thought. In these three
Latin poems, Bruno delineates a universal concept of science which
embraces all branches of scientific knowledge. Within this tripartite ency-
clopaedia, De triplici minimo et mensura is of the utmost significance, as
Bönker-Vallon points out, because in this work Bruno tries to conceptual-
ize a mathematical theory for measuring the infinite cosmos or, in a com-
prehensive sense, to create a theoretical substructure of the encyclopaedic
sciences. Based on the concept of a threefold minimum—i.e., God as the
monad of monads, the mathematical point and the physical atom—Bruno
demonstrates the metaphysical implications and qualities of point and
atom as primary functional minima, redefined as first and elementary spa-
tial structures comprising the coincidental relationship of maximum and
minimum, essential for conceiving the relationship between the infinite
space and its fundamental entities. The interconnection of metaphysical,
mathematical and physical minima provides accessibility to the systematic
nature of Bruno’s threefold theory of the infinite, which based on the idea
of a universal measure, allows for the development of the idea of univer-
sal science.
Introduction
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 9
the right place to commemorate the philosopher from Nola. For Grün bein,
the statue is an iconographic alarm signal, visualizing a rhetoric of fire, the
language of alchemy and metamorphoses that characterizes Bruno’s think-
ing. Finally, Grünbein brings thinkers and poets together in a virtual con-
versation across time and space: Bruno, Nietzsche, Scho pen hau er, and
Czesław Miłosz.
Anything but virtual were the exchanges we—philosophers, historians, and
literary scholars—had about Giordano Bruno in the congenial and inspiring
atmosphere of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin,
and our discussions and debates sowed many seeds. We are proud to see
how they have matured and grown now into this volume. At the end of this
project, we want to express our gratitude towards several individuals and
institutions for their unflinching support, financial as well as moral and in -
tel lectual: Jürgen Renn and Yehuda Elkana, the Max Planck Insti tute for the
History of Science, the Central European Uni versity, the Cent ral European
University Press, and, last but definitely not least, to Andreas Edel.
Finally, we would like to thank the students who assisted us in the com-
pletion of this volume with untiring effort, Fanny Neumann, Jussuf Spie gel,
Charlotte Wetzel and, especially, Oliver Schumacher, who also translated
Durs Grünbein’s contribution.
Freiburg and Berlin, September 2012
Henning Hufnagel,
Anne Eusterschulte
Turning Traditions Upside Down10
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 10
PART 1
Epistemic Practices of a Revolutionary:
Bruno’s Methods and Thinking
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 11
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:07 Oldal 12
PAUL RICHARD BLUM
Giordano Bruno’s Changing of
Default Positions
Ut Peripateticorum similiumque philosophantum sensus a principiis pe -
rinde se habeat atque puerorum: quos eodem instituendos ordine sus ci pi -
mus, quo nos optima mater erudiit natura.
Senart, 1914.
———. Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant de la philosophie. Paris: Imprimerie
nationale, 1925.
Fola Igúrbide, J. Giordano Bruno: drama en cinco actos divididos en quince cuadros.
Barcelona: Estab. tip. de F. Costa, 1912.
Holitscher, P. Giordano Bruno: historisches Drama in 5 Abteilungen. Stuttgart: Süd -
deutsches Verlags-Institut, 1898.
Kolbenheyer, E. G. Heroische Leidenschaften: die Tragödie des Giordano Bruno in drei
Teilen. Munich: Georg Müller, 1929.
Levi, D. Giordano Bruno, o, Le lotte del pensiero: dramma in cinque atti. Rome: Edo ardo
Perino, 1889.
Manzoni, R. La mente di Giordano Bruno. Locarno: Tipografia Mariotta, 1889.
McIntyre, J. L. Giordano Bruno. London, New York: Macmillan, 1903.
Plumptre, C. E. Giordano Bruno: A Tale of the Sixteenth Century. London: Chapman &
Hall, 1884.
Schefer, L. Göttliche Komödie in Rom. Milan: Società editrice Sonzogno, 1904.
Scotino, F. Giordano Bruno: scena drammatica. Naples: Stabilimento tipografico Rai -
mondi, 1870.
Warburg, A. “Giordano Bruno.” Ed. M. Ghelardi and M. Targia. Philosophy and Ico -
nology: Cassirer Studies 1 (2008): 16–58.
———. Tagebuch der Kulturwissenschaftlichen Bibliothek Warburg. Ed. K. Michels
and C. Schoell-Glass. Berlin: Akademie, 2001.
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 245
246 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
Secondary sources
Berggren, L. L’ombra dei grandi: monumenti e politica monumentale a Roma (1870–
1895). Rome: Artemide, 1996.
Canone, E. Bruno Redivivus: momenti della fortuna di Giordano Bruno nel XIX secolo.
Pisa: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 1998.
Forbes, F. D. A. Life of Pius X. London: Washbourne, 1918.
Gatti, H. “Frances Yates’s Hermetic Renaissance in the Documents held in the
Warburg Institute Archive.” Aries 2, no. 2 (2002): 193–210.
———. “The State of Giordano Bruno Studies at the End of the Four-Hundredth
Centenary of the Philosopher’s Death.” Renaissance Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2001): 252–61.
Mann, N. “Denkenergetische Inversion: Aby Warburg and Giordano Bruno.”
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 239
240 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
versally adopted this heroic conception which culminated in his tragic
death as a martyr of free-thought. Among the examples collected by
Salvestrini and now present in the Warburg Library are two novels,5 six
plays,6 and two musical dramas composed between the 1870s and 1920s.7
Although Bruno had, in these years, become an anticlerical rather than
a Catholic hero, his fictional representations included numerous Christo -
logical allusions,8 ranging from the scene of betrayal which authors attri -
bute to various Judas-like figures—Mocenigo or an old friend or a disciple
jealous of his fiancée’s affection for the philosopher—to his last moments.
Sometimes the words of Christ are placed in Bruno’s mouth. Bruno’s pan-
theism, a recurring theme of nineteenth-century scholarship—ex pres sed
through a hymn to nature in Clair’s drama—also features prominently.
Bruno’s martyrdom began in the inquisition jails. Like most authors,
Clair assumed that Bruno was tortured. Interrogated by the Pope, Bruno
points out that nine years of torture have not weakened his faith and that
he even prefers death to the dignity of the cardinal’s position.9 Other
plays, such as that of José Fola Igúrbide, feature entire scenes taking place
in the Inquisitional torture chamber.10 Scheffer’s novel also alludes to tor-
ture, but best of all is Davide Levi, who quoted passages from the Furori
Eroici to describe Bruno’s state of mind during torture sessions.11
In this context, and to anyone remotely familiar with the image of
Bruno in Risorgimento Italy, the first edition of Charles Clair’s drama be -
gins with a singular piece of earnest wishful thinking. It is a letter to Pope
Pius X, dated July 13, 1913, written from a luxury hotel near Lugano
(Stella d’Italia, San Mamette), in which the author apologizes for delays in
sending him his text. Clair writes that it is a question of Truth, a question
of rehabilitating a man so calumniated by the sixteenth century. The letter
appears in the first edition in French and Italian versions. In the second
edition, it features only in French.
239
Charles Clair published his Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant de la
philosophie twice. The first edition is the princeps of 1914. The copy of the
second edition, kept in the Warburg Library and dated 1925, is a num-
bered copy—No. 297—printed for Virgilio Salvestrini and signed and ded-
icated by the author. The second edition also contains a preface by Paul
Fort (1872–1960). Paul Fort was a friend of the author—at least, since
1914—as suggested by a copy of his Nocturnes (1914) which recently sur-
faced on the market. It bears a dedication to Clair. Paul Fort was also one
of the most important poets of his time, as well the founder and director of
the review Vers et Prose, which published such luminaries as Rimbaud,
Verlaine, Mallarmé, Lautréamont, and Guillaume Apollinaire. His avant-
propos to Clair’s Giordano Bruno thus stands out as a strong and eloquent
endorsement from a respected and charismatic figure of French Letters.
Hardly anything is known of Charles Clair outside the evidence pro-
vided by these two editions. He is absent from the Dictionnaire de Bio -
graphi es Françaises and all musical and literary bibliographies I have con-
sulted. His Giordano Bruno is the only work he ever published. No score
accompanies the text, and no evidence has yet surfaced to confirm whether
his musical drama was ever performed. Library catalogues sometimes con-
fuse our author with a Jesuit priest who lived between 1835 and 1899, and
who wrote on religion and religious art—an unlikely candidate for the
authorship of a musical drama on Giordano Bruno. Our Charles Clair held
the Ancient-Régime title of Comm. Visconte, with which he signed the let-
ter to the Pope accompanying his text. There he refers to the favors his
family has received from Pope Pius X and alludes to a telegram he had
already sent from Bordighera in 1912, announcing the imminent comple-
tion of the text.2
Divided in four acts, each act subdivided into tableaux, Clair’s musical
focuses on the early and final years of Bruno’s wandering life from Naples
(Act I), to Venice (Acts II & III) and Rome (Act IV). Unlike most histori -
cal fictions, the first edition includes notes with references to a bibliography
of eight monographs on Bruno by Bartholmèss, Kuhlenbeck, McIntyre,
Frith, Berti, Gentile, Brunnofer, and Mariano. The subtitle of the musical,
Le Chevalier errant de la philosophie, originates from Pierre Bayle’s ob ser -
vation that Bruno engaged in philosophical jousting wherever he trav-
elled.3 With Bartholmèss (1847), however, the image of Bruno as a wan-
dering knight alluded not only to his travels, but also to his powerful
imagination and to the chivalrous values of courage and audacity which he
practiced throughout his life and writings—a portrait somehow reminis-
cent of Cervantes’ Don Quixote.4 Those who wrote fiction on Bruno uni-
From Paris to Rome, Hamburg and London
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 239
240 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
by L. Firpo. Florence: Sansoni, 1958.
Spampanato, V. Documenti della vita di Giordano Bruno. Florence: Leo S. Olschki,
1933.
Notes
1 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), 83–87. Full text available at:
http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/mnemosyne/Bruno/pdf/1802234462.pdf
2 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1914), unpaginated dedication; Clair,
Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), xiii. Bordighera is a luxury resort on
the Ligurian Coast.
3 Bayle, Dictionnaire, I, 680. See Eugenio Canone’s introduction to Canone, Bruno
Redivivus, xx–xxi.
4 Bartholmèss, Jordano Bruno, II, 3; see also McIntyre, Giordano Bruno, 52.
5 Plumptre, Giordano Bruno; Schefer, Göttliche Komödie in Rom.
6 Scotino, Giordano Bruno: scena drammatica; Holitscher, Giordano Bruno: histo -
risches Drama in 5 Abteilungen; Levi, Gior dano Bruno, o Le lotte del pensiero;
Borngräber, Giordano Bruno: das neue Jahrhundert; Fola Igúrbide, Giordano
Bruno; Kolbenheyer, Heroische Leidenschaften.
7 Bartolucci, Giordano Bruno.
8 See, e.g., Levi, Giordano Bruno, 15, 124; Fola Igúrbide, José, Giordano Bruno, 38,
87 (Agony in the Garden). Best is undoubtedly Scotino’s observation: “Da molti il
Bruno è salutato il Cristo della Scienza…” in Scotino, Giordano Bruno, 16.
9 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925), 73.
10 Fola Igúrbide, Giordano Bruno, 50sq.
11 Levi, Giordano Bruno, 74, 93.
12 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1914), Warburg copy: “Dopo questa
letterà il Comm. Visconte Clair di nazionalità francese fù excommunicato («excom-
municazione maggiore»).”
13 Clair, Giordano Bruno ou le Chevalier errant (1925) xi.
14 Spampanato Documenti, 202.
15 Berggren, L’ombra dei grandi, 123.
16 Balan, Di Giordano Bruno, 14.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 246
247
17 Dialoghetti familiari tra un imbianchino e riquadratore di stanze fiorentino ed un sig-
nore romano sopra la vera storia di Giordano Bruno, 10–12, 22.
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:08 Oldal 173
174 Forms of Non-Conformity
when I thought he had forgotten the incident, he repaid me worse than the ass did
the lion; but I don’t want the matter to rest there.” Bruno, Candle-bearer, 100.
2 For an account of Bruno’s early years, see for instance Ciliberto, Giordano Bruno
or, more recently, Rowland, Giordano Bruno. For a concise recent summary of
research on Bruno, see Saiber, Geometry, 9–12. For a summary and analysis of the
Candelaio, see Moliterno, “Introduction,” in Bruno, Candle-bearer, 9–49; and Kodera,
“Einleitung zum Candelaio,” VII–LV.
3 Most notably perhaps is Pietro Aretino’s Cortigiana. (See also note 6 below.)
4 Ordine, Soglia, 45; cf. also Ciliberto, Bruno, 25.
5 On Bruno’s art of memory, see Sturlese, “Per un’interpretazione”; Clucas, “De
imaginum”; and Clucas, “Simulacra.”
6 With the possible exception of Aretino’s Cortigiana. Messer Maco, a painter from
Venice, was actually a friend of Aretino’s. Boccaccio’s Decameron (VII, 3 and 6; IX,
3 and 5) recounts delightful stories about the beffe that were played to Calandrino,
a simpleton and painter, by Bruno and Buffalmaco, two clever Florentine artists and
historical figures.
7 As stated by the title page.
8 This is a plot of ancient Indian origins which was well known in Italy at least since
the Decameron, cf. Doninger, The Bedtrick, 30 and passim. This trick also figures in
Bibbiena’s Calandria. Kodera, “Einleitung zum Candelaio,” XXXII–XXXVI, argues
that this scene can be read as an enactment of Bruno’s doctrine of shadows and a
parody of the Platonic myth of the cave. See also Kodera, “Un fallo.”
9 Bruno frequently fails to name authors with whom he has an intellectual affinity.
Granada, Universo infinito, 179 (with many references) has shown that when Bruno
mentions authors such as Ficino, Nicholas of Cusa, or Copernicus, then this is often
indicative of both a dependence and an intellectual rupture with the author in ques-
tion. The entire chapter of Granada’s book (169–96) is a valuable introduction to the
relationship between Bruno and Machiavelli. See also Ordine, “Teatro e conoscen-
za,” 532sq. On the presence of Machiavelli in Bruno’s Cabala, see Kodera, “Ein -
leitung zur Cabala,” LXXXVIIIsqq.
10 “Notwithstanding that what I enjoyed tonight had not been given to me by the gods
or nature and had been denied to me by Fortune, judgement made me recognise the
opportunity, diligence made me grab it by the hair, and perseverance allowed me to
hold it fast” (V, 19; Bruno, Candle-bearer, 177, modi fied).
Kircher’s Itinerarium Extaticum accepted most of these premises in one
form or another; the research by his contemporary Evangelista Torricelli
had gone far toward proving the existence of an atmosphere, and he him-
self was no less convinced than his angel Cosmiel that Earth and heaven
were made of the same basic stuff. Schott bolsters Kircher’s contentions
about the Moon’s atmosphere by naming some of the modern natural
philosophers who agree with him:
The question, then, is: Does the Moon have an atmosphere, just as
our Earth has one of its own? For many more recent scholars, after
the discovery of the telescope, have identified a layer surrounding
[the Moon] of air or a denser sort of aether, like Kepler, Maestlin,
Galileo, Longomontanus, Giordano Bruno, David Fabricius, Anto nio
Maria de Rheita, Mario Bettini, Langrenius, Wendelin, Johannes
Bapt ista Cysatus, and Scheiner; our Author [that is, Kircher] cited
these last two in his Preface, and agreed with them.15
Bruno, then, is set comfortably, if somewhat anachronistically, among a
group of modern astronomers (he died before the invention of the tele-
scope). He may not appear explicitly as the Giordano Bruno who pro-
claimed the infinite size of the universe, but no one who read the heretic’s
opinions on the lunar atmosphere could do so without also taking in his
larger ideas, ideas relevant, moreover, to the Iter Extaticum’s later discus-
sions of the size of the universe and panspermia rerum. In effect, both
Schott, by mentioning Bruno explicitly, and his Jesuit readers, by forbear-
A Catholic reader of Giordano Bruno in Counter-Reformation Rome
HUFNAGEL.nyomdai.imprimált.:... 2.4.2013 14:09 Oldal 229
230 Reflections of an Intellectual Burning
ing to object to Bruno as an indexed author, had decided, tacitly but firmly,
to prefer the free development of philosophical inquiry to the preservation
of doctrinal purity, and this was the same decision that Kircher himself had
made in writing his Itinerarium Extaticum in the first place.
Visible: 0% - 100%
Here is a table of additional scholars mentioned in Turning Traditions Upside Down, focusing on their contributions and relevance to the study of Giordano Bruno:
| Scholar | Focus/Contribution | Notable Ideas | Relevance to Bruno Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aby Warburg | Investigated Bruno’s philosophy of mnemonics and "thinking through images." | Suggested that Bruno’s use of imagery reflects deeper cognitive and philosophical operations tied to Renaissance thought. | Warburg’s reflections remain central to understanding Bruno’s approach to memory and symbolism【57:0†source】. |
| Frances Yates | Positioned Bruno as a key figure in Renaissance Hermeticism. | Emphasized the influence of Hermetic texts on Bruno’s cosmology and mnemonics. | Inspired modern Bruno scholarship, though her interpretation has been critically reassessed【57:1†source】. |
| Cesare Vasoli | Analyzed Bruno’s reception in the context of Renaissance philosophy and Neo-Platonism. | Highlighted the blending of ancient and contemporary ideas in Bruno’s works. | Provided foundational insights into the philosophical currents influencing Bruno【57:1†source】. |
| Hélène Védrine | Explored Bruno’s metaphysical and epistemological contributions. | Focused on Bruno’s methods of synthesis and his critique of Aristotelian thought. | Her work deepens understanding of Bruno’s philosophical challenges to tradition【57:1†source】. |
| Eduard Zeller | Examined Bruno’s position within the history of Western philosophy. | Provided critical analysis of Bruno’s integration of metaphysical monism with emerging scientific thought. | Zeller’s interpretations highlight Bruno’s role as a transitional figure between Renaissance and modern philosophy【57:1†source】. |
| Paul Richard Blum | Discussed Bruno’s epistemology, particularly his critique of cognitive "default positions." | Identified Bruno’s demand for a meta-awareness of cognitive assumptions, central to his philosophy of infinity. | Frames Bruno as an early advocate for epistemic flexibility and intellectual openness【57:12†source】. |
| Angelika Bönker-Vallon | Explored the Frankfurt Trilogy, focusing on Bruno’s integration of metaphysics, mathematics, and physical thought. | Highlighted Bruno’s development of a "universal measure" as a theoretical foundation for understanding the infinite. | Positioned Bruno’s De triplici minimo et mensura as a cornerstone of his cosmological and mathematical theories【57:12†source】. |
| Ingrid Rowland | Investigated Bruno’s reception during the Counter-Reformation, particularly among Jesuits. | Examined how Bruno’s ideas influenced and were selectively adopted by figures like Athanasius Kircher. | Sheds light on Bruno’s enduring, albeit contentious, influence within Catholic intellectual traditions【57:19†source】. |
| Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann | Explored metaphysical symbolism in Bruno’s works and its connections to early modern theosophy. | Highlighted the integration of Hermetic and Kabbalistic elements in Bruno’s metaphysical framework. | Demonstrates the diverse influences shaping Bruno’s cosmological and metaphysical ideas【57:4†source】. |
This table covers additional scholars who are either contributors to the book or are critically discussed for their influence on Bruno studies. Let me know if you’d like details on specific aspects!