De occulta philosophia — 1510 / 1533 Comparison

Agrippa von Nettesheim · Würzburg draft (W) vs. Cologne edition (K)
← Back to chapter index
Book III — Ceremonial Magic — Chapter 5

Of the Orders of Evil Spirits and Their Descent

De tribus ducibus religionis qui nos ad veritatis semitam perducunt
Revised & Expanded

Perrone Compagni — Table of Comparison

1533 edition (3:5): W, 3: 28 + two short additions

This chapter, De tribus ducibus religionis qui nos ad veritatis semitam perducunt (“Of the Orders of Evil Spirits and Their Descent”), occupies a significant place in Agrippa's systematic exposition of occult philosophy. In the 1533 Cologne printed edition (De occulta philosophia libri tres, sigla K in Perrone Compagni's critical apparatus), the text represents Agrippa's mature formulation of the ideas it addresses, the product of over two decades of reading, travel, and revision since the composition of the Würzburg draft.

This chapter corresponds to W 3:28 in the Würzburg draft, with shorter additions in the 1533 text. The core argument is preserved from W, but Agrippa refined it with supplementary passages, qualifying or extending particular points.

The extent of revision in this chapter illustrates the dynamic character of Agrippa's rewriting process. Rather than simply updating facts, he appears to have substantially reconfigured the argument. Comparison with the partial edition A — which represents an intermediate stage — may reveal whether the additions were introduced gradually or in a single later revision.

Scholarly Perspectives

The orders of evil spirits mirror the hierarchy of angels, forming the shadow-side of the celestial taxonomy. Lehrich (2003) situates Agrippa's demonology within the tradition of late antique and medieval angelology, noting that the careful classification of demonic orders serves a practical purpose: the magician who understands the hierarchy can navigate it safely, distinguishing licit operations (working with angels) from illicit ones (summoning demons without proper authority). Miles (2008) connects the demonological chapters to his argument about the retraction: the very comprehensiveness of the demonic taxonomy exposes the dangerous knowledge that Agrippa's later apologia attempts to disown.