De occulta philosophia — 1510 / 1533 Comparison

Agrippa von Nettesheim · Würzburg draft (W) vs. Cologne edition (K)
← Back to chapter index
Book II — Mathematical Magic — Chapter 14

Of the Numbers Eleven and Twelve

De undenario et duodenario, cum duplici duodenarii scala, cabalistica et orphica
Largely New

Perrone Compagni — Table of Comparison

1533 edition (2:14): new, except for a short passage from W, 2: 28

This chapter, De undenario et duodenario, cum duplici duodenarii scala, cabalistica et orphica (“Of the Numbers Eleven and Twelve”), occupies a significant place in Agrippa's systematic exposition of occult philosophy. In the 1533 Cologne printed edition (De occulta philosophia libri tres, sigla K in Perrone Compagni's critical apparatus), the text represents Agrippa's mature formulation of the ideas it addresses, the product of over two decades of reading, travel, and revision since the composition of the Würzburg draft.

According to Perrone Compagni's table of comparison, this chapter is new in the 1533 edition and has no direct counterpart in the Würzburg manuscript (W = MS M.ch.q.50). The description notes: \u201cexcept for a short passage from W, 2: 28.\u201d Its addition reflects the conceptual enrichment Agrippa undertook between approximately 1510 and the early 1530s, incorporating sources and arguments unavailable or unexplored in the juvenile draft.

The stability of this chapter across the manuscript and printed versions suggests it belongs to the secure core of Agrippa's natural-magical argument as it was constituted by 1510. Such chapters allow scholars to reconstruct the intellectual foundation on which the more elaborate structures of the 1533 edition were built.

Scholarly Perspectives

The number-scale chapters — one of the most distinctive structural features of DOP — present Pythagorean-Neoplatonic number theory in the form of comparative tables linking each number to its correspondences at every level of reality. Lehrich (2003) traces the tradition to Iamblichus's Theology of Arithmetic, noting that for Agrippa as for Iamblichus, numbers are not abstract quantities but ontological principles that structure existence from its highest to its lowest levels. Daniels (1964) emphasises the empiricist dimension: the scales are ultimately maps of observed correspondences.